What is torture? 
---
illegal ... says 3 jews and 6 catholics on the USSC.

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:36:24 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
> Have you ever read the international conventions that ban torture?
> Does it make a difference how they define torture?
>
> I don't have the document in this computer, but I recall that it
> includes things as trivial as "insulting the captive or his race,
> nationality, or his relatives". Or any treatment that causes "fear or
> anxiety or embarrassment". In other words, almost anything can be
> defined as torture, depending upon how the captive "feels about
> his/her treatment". Is that what most people visualize when someone
> says "torture"? Probably not, but that is what happens when anti-West
> activists are allowed to use corrupt language and imagery to conflate
> all forms of interviews and interrogation with real torture.
>
> Why is there no rational or objective definition of torture? And why
> are the good guys held to impossible standards while nobody does
> anything about truly evil people who engage in the most extreme forms
> of torture including publicly distributed beheadings?
>
> U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson wrote that "The Constitution
> is not a suicide pact", but apparently the UN and Western Civilization
> have decided that they will invent and enforce a Western suicide pact
> in the name of cultural diversity, even if it destroys us
>
> Let me propose a more rational and objective definition of torture
> during the conduct of an interview or interrogation:
> 1. Torture is generally that which inflicts permanent, severe, or
> long-term physical damage or death;
> 2. Torture can also be a process that inflicts excruciating pain for
> an instant, or moderate pain for a long period (minor pain does not
> count);
> 3. Torture can also be a process that is known from past experience
> is LIKELY or guaranteed to create severe long-term psychological
> damage (i.e. craziness);
> 4. Torture is not something that is transitory or automatically
> resolved in a short time, whether mental or physical;
> 5. Torture is not anything that is routinely used in the training of
> our soldiers without lasting injury (which includes waterboarding,
> sleep deprivation, reduced food and water for a few days, exposure to
> cold, exposure to tear gas, etc);
> 6. Torture is not anything that experimenters would be willing do
> more than once (Peter Hitchens, a non-military civilian, voluntarily
> asked to be waterboarded and when he was not suffering enough after it
> was over, asked to be waterboarded again; whereas many military
> personnel have undergone many forms of low-level "torture" over and
> over.)
>
> How does this apply to the U.S.? We should, as many other countries
> have signed various international agreements, sign a treaty only if we
> can include a codicil or reservation that states we will only agree to
> the treaty jurisdiction if our reasonable definition is used to
> control our actions. We will also comply with all the reasonable
> terms of the treaties even if we don't sign the treaty. Naturally,
> the other side will simply ignore even the most important principles
> of all treaties whenever it suits them.
>
> It is long past time for us to stop rubber-stamping any ludicrous
> treaty or conditions just so we can "look good". We should negotiate
> the treaties or agreements so that they "do good". This is best
> achieved by educating the entire world during the treaty-writing
> process, rather than waiting until we are being prosecuted or
> handicapped by absurd provisions that should have been removed from
> the original drafts by opposition and negotiations.
>
> ---
> Randy
>
>
> __._,_.___
>  ------------------------------
> Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> ------------------------------
>  
>
>  Visit Your Group 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbm42ZWRtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTgyMjQxNTg->
>  
>    
>    
>  [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlM2ZsOW9sBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxODIyNDE1OA-->
>  
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • 
> Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use 
> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>  
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to