*Obama’s Bailout for Communist Dictators*

Posted By *Daniel Greenfield* On December 18, 2014

The Soviet Union did not have to fall. If Carter had won a second term and
Mondale had succeeded him, the Communist dictatorship might have received
the outside help it needed to survive.

And we would still be living under the shadow of the Cold War.

Carter couldn’t save the Soviet Union, but he did his best to save Castro
<http://townhall.com/columnists/humbertofontova/2011/04/02/jimmy_carter_charms_the_castro_brothers_in_havana/page/full>,
visiting Fidel and Raul in Cuba where the second worst president in
American history described his meeting with Castro as a greeting among “old
friends”.

Raul Castro called Carter “the best of all U.S. presidents.”

Obama’s dirty deal with Raul will make the worst president in American
history, Castro’s new best friend.

Carter couldn’t save Castro, but Obama did. This was not a prisoner
exchange. This was a Communist bailout.

Obama boasted that he would increase the flow of money to Cuba from
businesses, from bank accounts and from trade. When he said, “We’re
significantly increasing the amount of money that can be sent to Cuba”,
that was his real mission statement.

The Castro regime is on its last legs. Its sponsors in Moscow and Caracas
are going bankrupt due to failing energy prices. The last hope of the
Butcher of Havana was a bailout from Washington D.C.

And that’s exactly what Obama gave him.

Obama has protected the Castros from regime change as if Communist
dictators are an endangered species.

>From the beginning, Obama put his foreign policy at the disposal of Havana
when he backed Honduran leftist thug Manuel Zelaya’s attempt to shred its
Constitution over the protests of the country’s Congress and Supreme Court.
And its military, which refused to obey his illegal orders.

Obama’s support for an elected dictator in Honduras should have warned
Americans that their newly elected leader viewed men like Zelaya favorably
and constitutions and the separation of powers between the branches of
government unfavorably. It also showcased his agenda for Latin America.

His embrace of Raul Castro brings that agenda out into the open even if he
still insists in wrapping it in dishonest claims about “freedom” and
“openness” while bailing out a Communist dictatorship.

Obama began his Castro speech with a lie, declaring, “The United States of
America is changing its relationship with the people of Cuba.”

The Cuban people have no relationship with the United States because they
have no free elections and no say in how they are governed. The only Cubans
who have a relationship with the United States fled here on rafts.

Obama did not make his dirty deal with the Cuban people. He made it in a
marathon phone call with the Cuban dictator.

When Obama claims that his deal with Raul Castro represents a new
relationship with the people of Cuba, he is endorsing a Communist
dictatorship as the legitimate representative of the Cuban people.

This is a retroactive endorsement of the Castro regime and its entire
history of mass murder and political terror. Obama is not trying to “open
up” Cuba as he claimed. He likes Cuba just the way it is; Communist and
closed.

Obama did not consult the Cuban people, just as he did not consult the
American people. He disregarded the embargo, Congress, the Constitution and
the freedom of the Cuban people.

His dictatorial disregard of the embargo, which can only be eliminated by
Congress, in order to support a dictatorship, is a disturbing reminder that
the road he is walking down leads to a miserable tyranny.

Cuban-American senators from both parties have been unanimous in condemning
the move. These senators are the closest thing to Cuban elected officials.
But Obama disregarded Senator Menendez, a man of his own party, Senator
Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz.

Instead Obama chose to stand with Raul Castro and his Communist
dictatorship.

Obama tried to whitewash his crime by exploiting Alan Gross, a USAID
contractor who was imprisoned and abused by the Castro regime, as if the
release of an American hostage justified helping the men holding him
hostage stay in power. And the media, which was reprinting Castro’s
propaganda claiming that Gross’ imprisonment was justified, is busy now
pretending that it cares about his release.

He had similarly tried to whitewash his Taliban amnesty by using Bergdahl
and his parents as cover. If a deal is struck with Iran, the release of
Robert Levinson, Saeed Abedini or Amir Hekmati will almost certainly be
used to divert attention from the fact that their own government has
collaborated with the thugs and terrorists who took them hostage.

Even though Obama criticized European countries for paying financial
ransoms to ISIS, his own ransom paid to the Castros is worth countless
billions. And the blood money pouring out of American banks into the Castro
regime will encourage other dictatorships to take Americans hostage as
leverage for obtaining concessions from the United States. Americans abroad
will suffer for Obama’s dirty deal.

No European country recognized ISIS in exchange for the release of
hostages. Only Obama was willing to go that far with Cuba, not only opening
diplomatic and economic relations, but promising to remove the Communist
dictatorship from the list of state sponsors of terror despite the fact
that the last State Department review found that Cuba continued to support
the leftist narco-terrorists of FARC.

FARC had taken its own American hostages who were starved and beaten,
tortured and abused.

Now Obama has given in to the demand of a state
<http://freebeacon.com/national-security/cuba-demands-removal-from-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism/>
sponsor of terror to be removed from the list of state sponsors of
terrorism in exchange for releasing a hostage.

Obama has sent a message to Iran that the best way to secure a deal is by
wrapping it in an American hostage. He has told ISIS that we do negotiate
with terrorists. And he has once again demonstrated that his vaunted “smart
power” is nothing more than appeasement wrapped in excuses and lies.

But Obama did not act to help Alan Gross. He did not even act because he
genuinely thought that diplomatic relations would open up Cuba. In his
speech, Obama used the claim commonly put forward by Castro apologists that
the very fact that the Castros were still in power proved that sanctions
had failed. Yet the lack of sanctions against Cuba by the rest of the world
certainly did not usher in the new spirit of openness that Obama is
promising. Rewarding dictators with cash never frees a nation.

This was not about saving Alan Gross. It was about saving Raul Castro.

Obama and Castro are both weakened leaders of the left. Like the Castros,
Obama has lost international influence and his own people have turned on
him. The only thing he has left is unilateral rule.

If Obama saw something of his own hopes and aspirations to engage in a
populist transformation of the United States in Manuel Zelaya or Hugo
Chavez, his horizons have narrowed down to those of Raul Castro. His
ability to remake the world has vanished and the American people are
revolting against his collectivization efforts. They want open health care
markets, free speech and honest government.

Obama can no longer remake the Middle East, he certainly can’t bring the
Soviet Union back from the dead, but he could still bail out Raul Castro
and maintain Communist rule in Cuba.

No matter how often Obama claims to be “on the right side of history”, the
Castros are a living reminder that to be on the left is to be on the wrong
side of history.

Obama did not want to see the “Berlin Wall” fall in Havana on his watch.
After watching his own grip on the United States collapse, he did not want
to see the left fail again.

We can never know how history might have been different if Carter had
gotten a second term or if Mondale had replaced Reagan. But Obama’s deal
with Castro reminds us that the end of the USSR was not inevitable. It
happened because we stood up against the tyrants in the Kremlin and their
useful idiots in the White House.

A good man like Reagan could make a difference by bringing down the USSR. A
bad man like Obama can make a difference by keeping Cuba Communist.

*Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: **Click here*
<http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=david+horowitz&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&qid=1316459840&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&sort=daterank>
*.*

*Subscribe*
<http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&id=c761755bdf>*
to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, and **LIKE*
<https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang>* it on **Facebook.*
<https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang>
------------------------------

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: *http://www.frontpagemag.com
<http://www.frontpagemag.com>*

URL to article:
*http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamas-bailout-for-communist-dictators/
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obamas-bailout-for-communist-dictators/>*




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbjg3MzlqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTg5MTQ0Nzk->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNHB2MWEwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxODkxNDQ3OQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to