http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/ken-blackwell/surrender-cuba-why-didn-t-we-think


Surrender to Cuba? Why Didn’t We Think Of That?

*December 19, 2014 - 10:51 AM *
------------------------------





*By Ken Blackwell <http://www.cnsnews.com/source/ken-blackwell> & Bob
Morrison <http://www.cnsnews.com/source/bob-morrison>*

[image: Obama US Cuba] <http://www.cnsnews.com/image/obama-us-cuba>

President Barack Obama speaks in the Cabinet Room of the White House in
Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2014, to announce the U.S. will end its
outdated approach to Cuba that has failed to advance U.S. interests. (AP
Photo/Doug Mills, Pool)

“Obama gives the Castro regime in Cuba an undeserved bailout.” Was that a
headline from Ronald Reagan’s favorite conservative weekly, *Human Events? *Or,
perhaps a stiff rejoinder from the up-to-the-minute reporting of the *Weekly
Standard? *

No!. That’s the headline on an editorial in—can you believe?—the*
Washington Post!*
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-obama-administration-extends-the-castro-regime-in-cuba-a-bailout-it-doesnt-deserve/2014/12/17/a25a15d4-860c-11e4-9534-f79a23c40e6c_story.html>
It
gets better. The *Post *flays President Obama’s rationale for lifting the
embargo on Cuba (the incoming GOP Congress will have something to say about
this) and it dissects the President’s White House statement.

The administration’s policy is so bad that even the Washington Post has
been forced to go to the ramparts in defense of truth and good policy.

At first blush, it looks like another surprising initiative from this
amazing Presidency. Consider: We have had Presidents of both parties
maintaining a policy of unusual consistency toward the captive island
nation of Cuba for more than half a century. Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford,
Reagan, Bush and Bush for the Republicans. But there was little difference
when the Oval Office was occupied by Democrats JFK, LBJ, Jimmy Carter and
Bill Clinton.

It’s most curious that with that bi-partisan consensus of *ten U.S.
Presidents, *it never occurred to any of them: Why not just surrender to
Cuba? Why not simply run up the white flag?

That is what this policy is. As the *Post *editorial lays out the case,
every one of the President’s arguments *for *this American retreat is
refuted by the facts and by history.

No wonder the Obama administration hastened to get Tony Blinken confirmed
<http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/17/politics/blinken-senate-confirmation/> in a
Lame Duck Democratic Senate. The members of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee must have had just such a Cuban overture in mind when they
quizzed the President’s pick for No. 2 at the State Department. No hint of
this in-the-works capitulation escaped as Blinken was waved through.

>From now on, we’d like to see *every *nominee for a top spot at State or
Defense asked if he or she has read *The Black Book of Communism.
<http://www.amazon.com/Black-Book-Communism-Crimes-Repression/dp/0674076087/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1418925910&sr=1-1&keywords=black+book+of+communism>
*Pages 647-665 of this volume records in dreadful detail the record of mass
murder, terror, and repression of the Castro regime.

We’ve heard of a “war on women.” Would the Obama administration care to
read what a distinguished woman—even a longtime friend of Fidel Castro, Dr.
Martha Frayde—experienced in one of his prisons?

*My cell was six meters by five. There were twenty-two of us sleeping there
in bunk beds of two or three layers. The basins we had to wash in were
filthy, sometimes it was impossible to wash at all. [Unable to empty the
toilets] a layer of excrement formed, invading our cells.. We managed to
sweep away some of [it] with the pressure hoses, but there still wasn’t
enough water, and we had to live with this vile layer for another few days.*

This is the regime that Mr. Obama is now rewarding.

Do we care about freedom? The press it totally controlled. Religion? “In
Cuba, religious activity was only lawful if explicitly authorized by the
state.” This brief statement is from the State Department’s 2013 report on
International Religious Freedom. Does this White House, does this State
Department even read what it publishes?

On that last point, perhaps it’s not so surprising after all. President
Obama’s administration is the first in U.S. history to try to coerce
Americans and their religious institutions into subsidizing the killing of
unborn children. It is also the first in U.S. history to tell the Supreme
Court that it and not the churches themselves is capable of deciding who is
and is not an ordained minister in the denominations [see *Hosanna Tabor v.
EEOC*]. Fortunately for us, the Supreme Court slapped down Mr. Obama’s
contention—by a vote of 9-0!

Thinking of this latest diplomatic blunder, we have to recall Ron Radosh’s
poignant and mordantly funny story in his book, *Commies: A Journey through
the Old Left, the New Left, and the Leftover Left. *Young Radosh, then a
Communist Party member, went to Cuba with a group of American
psychiatrists. These Marxists were given a tour of one of Castro’s mental
hospitals.

The American “Commies” soon raced back onto their tour bus—horrified. They
had just witnessed an entire ward of Cuban mental patients—all of them had
been subjected to lobotomies. This barbarous practice had been condemned
for decades in the United States and most civilized countries.

Trying to quiet the uproar, the Communist Party guide for the bus tour
reassured his charges. “Don’t’ worry. It’s OK. Those are *Socialist *
lobotomies!”

So let’s not worry. It seems the Obama administration’s Cuba policy makers,
too, have all had Socialist lobotomies.

Ken Blackwell, former Secretary of State in Ohio, is the Senior Fellow for
Family Empowerment at the Family Research Council. He serves on the board
of directors of the Club for Growth and the National Taxpayers Union.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcDExODlkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTkwMjg3NDk->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDM1MXVjBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxOTAyODc0OQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to