http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/01/the_lefts_base_motive_vengeance.html



January 2, 2015
The Left's Base Motive: Vengeance

By J.R. Dunn <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/jr_dunn/>

American leftism has gotten an awful lot of mileage by monopolizing the
moral high ground. It is the sole force in American that favors the poor.
The sole enemy of racism. The sole comforter of rape victims.  The sole
protector of defenseless Muslims. The sole guardian of the environment, and
so on ad nauseum.

It all falls apart eventually -- with friends like the left, nobody needs
enemies. But often overlooked is that fact that it’s bogus from the start.
Any prolonged glance at the left reveals it to be an ideology of power, its
major tool violence, its goal revenge.

Leftism has always been about revenge. The works of Marx are filled with
fantasies of retribution and judgment. Their tone reeks of resentment and
paranoia, with blame cast for even the most trivial. "The bourgeoisie,”
Marx once declared in a letter to Engels, “will remember my carbuncles
until their dying day.” That’s leftism in a nutshell.

The Paris communards of 1870, the first instance of an actual leftist
government-in-being, immediately began shooting bourgeois on taking power,
giving full rein to the European hatred for the middle class that is all
but incomprehensible to Americans. That practice has been repeated by every
hard left government that has ever taken power -- the USSR, communist
China, Castroite Cuba, Pol Pot’s Kampuchea, down to minor examples such as
Bela Kun’s Hungarian “Regime of Light” (1919), which reintroduced the Roman
practice of decimation.

This unvarying tendency toward atrocity suggests that all these regimes had
something in common, and it’s not that they all suffered from boils. It’s
the lust for vengeance -- revenge for slights and crimes either real or
imaginary,  that can be found in every leftist from Nechaev to Bill Ayers.
No less than Barack Obama spilled that when, his back apparently against
the wall in 2012, he began ranting about “voting for revenge
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2012/11/03/obama-romney-revenge-ohio-election-2012/1679161/>
”.

This was displayed clearly enough this past holiday season.

First in the wave of bogus rape stories, brought up not to assure
prosecution or to curtail such crimes, but solely as ideological weapons
for use by feminists.

American leftism has always been about magnifying trivial complaints to
serve as excuses for revolutionary action. The U.S. has never had a feudal
system, nor a proletariat, nor any other conceivable reason for revolution.
(German Marxist Werner Sombart
<http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkuscholarworks.ku.edu%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F1808%2F4891%2FMARSV6N2BR4.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1%26isAllowed%3Dy&ei=cfWiVJjTHcWeggShnIKIBw&usg=AFQjCNGQ3i-Md6kRDVQ84lBkgYe6bHjMIQ>
pointed out in 1903 that the American masses already possessed what the
left was promising them. His comrades badgered him mercilessly for this
insight.) Instead we see trivia blown up to apocalyptic proportions -- and
nowhere less than in feminism. Betty Friedan hated the suburbs. Gloria
Steinem served as a Playboy bunny and never got over the humiliation. They
therefore set out to upend Western civilization by inflating these slights
while millions of other women fastened on atrocities such as “the male
gaze,” having doors opened for them, “manspreading
<https://www.yahoo.com/health/is-manspreading-a-medical-necessity-106551544862.html>,”
and attempted pickups -- or lack of the same.

The one actual atrocity available was rape, which feminists have utilized
as heavy artillery -- “all men are rapists”, “all sex is rape”, and the
like. The latest barrage came from Tawana Dunham and *Rolling Stone’s*
“Jackie.”

Dunham, the East Coast sophisticate’s 300-lb. “It” girl, claimed in a
memoir that she had been raped by an infamous Republican while at college,
while “Jackie” regaled *Rolling Stone* with a tale of gang rape at the
hands of the always-reliable frat house.

Suffice to say not a single detail of either story help up. A “Barry” did
attend Oberlin, and he was a power in local campus conservative politics,
but he lacked a handlebar mustache and he’d never met Dunham. The
fraternity in “Jackie’s” yarn threw no party the night in question, nor did
she show any signs of suffering such an ordeal.

One of the grotesque aspects of this scandal is that nobody in the legacy
media so much as alluded to the Brawley and Duke hoaxes, which in many ways
were identical to these accounts. In the Brawley case a black teenage girl,
afraid to return home after a late night out, claimed to have been raped by
a gang of whites under degrading circumstances. A gullible media hooted the
story to the skies, egged on by the “Rev.” Al Sharpton. In the Duke case,
the entire lacrosse team was publicly indicted for the mass rape of a
stripper brought in to entertain a stag party.

Both these stories began to collapse almost immediately, but proponents
insisted it didn’t matter -- white men had raped black women innumerable
times before, so collective guilt demanded that someone be persecuted. As
for Duke, lacrosse was an upper-class WASP sport, and the team deserved to
be punished for that alone.

Dunham and “Jackie” would do well to contemplate the fates of the accusers
in these hoaxes. Although Brawley’s champion Al Sharpton used the incident
as his next step in clawing his way to the heights (if that’s the word) of
MSNBC, Brawley herself today lives
<http://nypost.com/2012/12/23/25-years-after-her-rape-claims-sparked-a-firestorm-tawana-brawley-avoids-the-spotlight/>
pseudonymously in Northern Virginia owing millions in legal fines. The Duke
athlete’s accuser, Crystal Mangum, is serving hard time
<http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/11/22/3396116/jury-in-mangum-murder-trial-continue.html>
for the murder of a paramour.

Both Dunham and “Jackie” were looking for revenge for something -- all that
we know is that it wasn’t rape.

Even more serious -- for the nation as a whole as well as those directly
involved -- is current racial unrest triggered by blatant attempts to
manipulate racial tensions through the actions and rhetoric of Barack Obama
and Eric Holder et al. Long-term efforts to decriminalize the actions of
black lawbreakers, beginning with the Trayvon Martin incident and
progressing to the Ferguson shooting, have dovetailed with several standard
episodes of police incompetence in Cleveland and Staten Island to create as
fraught a racial atmosphere as at any time since the late 60s. (So much for
the “post-racial” president.) This culminated in the assassination of two
police officers in Brooklyn by an unstable career criminal, Ismaaiyl
Brinsley, who had boasted on his Facebook page that he was out to avenge
the Brown shooting by “giving wings to pigs.” (With the customary
competence of the urban gangster, Brinsley shot not white officers but
Wenjian Liu, an Asian, and Rafeal Ramos, a Hispanic.)

Here is a case where the leftist yearning for vengeance was reified by a
maniac -- a not at all uncommon occurrence. Their rhetoric and posturing
brought their fantasies and desires for vengeance to life before their eyes
-- though certainly not in a way that they would have approved of, seeing
as there can be little opportunity to exploit it. Whatever else he was,
Brinsley is in no way a revolutionary hero.

The left’s entanglement with vengeance is easily understood -- it has
nothing else. Their messiah has failed to lead them into Eden -- his
policies, both domestic and foreign, have failed catastrophically one after
another, leaving him nothing to show for six years as president and a
nightmare gauntlet for the remainder of his term. His response -- and the
response of the left as a whole -- amounts to little more than disjointed
and incoherent actions. In the past six years, every last hope and dream of
the left has been exposed -- there is nothing left.

So what does the left have but vengeance? It got them this far -- it will
have to maintain them through the rest of Obama’s tenure, and beyond.

So it follows that we will see more of it over the coming two years.  It
could be argued, in fact, that a number of Obama’s recent actions amount to
revenge. His immigration “reform” was punishment for a nation not worthy of
him. His “opening” to Cuba acts as a punishment of Hispanics for letting
him down in the midterms.

“Revenge is a dish best eaten cold”; “When seeking vengeance, be sure to
dig two graves”. All the adages concerning revenge are cautionary. It’s
something to be avoided, to left to fate or karma or the hands of the
Almighty. This is not something to be overlooked, if the condition of
Tawana Brawley and Crystal Mangum are any indication.

But the left will overlook it. They despise ancient wisdom and they don’t
have an Almighty. That being the case, we should prepare for a parade of
Trayvons and “Jackies”, Lenas, and Ismaaiyls.


__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZnRobzNwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjAyMTEyNDE->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlM20ydTZqBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyMDIxMTI0MQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to