http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/01/one_sided_multiculturalism.html



January 24, 2015
One-Sided Multiculturalism: A Byproduct of the Left's Love Affair with Islam

By Owen McCormack <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/owen_mccormack/>

As coverage of the recent bloodshed in Paris got underway, it became
glaringly evident that a predictable narrative was being re-established
amongst the far-left media outlets of *The New York Times*, MSNBC, and
CNN.  True to form, they examined this act of Islamic terrorism from a
number of different vantage points – disenfranchised youth, the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict, and U.S. intervention in the Middle East –
quick to remind their audience that Islam is a “religion of peace” and that
these acts do not represent the sentiment of most law-abiding Muslims

This is certainly a fair and valid point; however, it has been proven time
and time again to lack intellectual substance when one considers the range
of terror attacks throughout the international community that have
specifically targeted civilians.

   - 1993 World Trade Center bombing (6 killed) – New York, New York
   - 2001 World Trade Center, Pentagon (2,996) – New York, New York
   - 2002 nightclub bombing (202) – Bali, Indonesia
   - 2004 train bombings (191) – Madrid, Spain
   - 2005 train bombings (52) – London, England
   - 2006 train bombings (209) – Mumbai, India
   - 2008 multiple shooting/bombing attacks (164) – Mumbai, India
   - 2013 shopping mall attack (67) – Nairobi, Kenya
   - 2015 village razed (2,000) – Baga, Nigeria
   - 2015 Charlie Hedbo attack (17) – Paris, France

The numbers are sobering.  Each attack illustrates a pattern of violence
that has become consistent over the past two decades.  So how did we get to
a point in which President Obama referred to the carnage in Paris as
“senseless violence”?  Perhaps he could have gone a step farther and simply
referred to the murders as “workplace violence” – which is how he described
to the 2009 massacre at Fort Hood.  His words are misleading and exemplify
a peculiar social narrative within Western society that makes a calculated
effort to tiptoe around Islamic fascism.  If and when one makes an inquiry
regarding Islam and the pattern of violence that has come to define the
religion, the term “Islamaphobia” is used to denigrate the inquiring mind.
Why is there such a reluctance to speak openly and honestly about the
second largest religion in the world?

As the Muslim population continues to grow, particularly within Europe,
such a dialogue needs to be established.  Unfortunately, it will not come
easily, as evidenced by Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent comments
that he will be referring to the Islamic State as its Arabic acronym *Daesh*:
“Daesh claims to be fighting for Islam but its actions are an insult to
Islam.”  The French foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, further exemplified
the Orwellian nature of this play on words when he stated, “I do not
recommend using the term Islamic State because it blurs the lines between
Islam, Muslims, and Islamists.”  Therein lies the problem – the true nature
of this conflict doesn’t fit into the left’s neatly constructed worldview.
Despite the fact that the Islamic State, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula,
and al-Nusra Front are incredibly explicit regarding the religious nature
of their ideology.

According to a recent study conducted by the Pew Research Center, a
significant percentage of Muslims responded favorably when asked if
“suicide bombings can be justified against civilian targets in order to
defend Islam from its enemies[.]”  Unquestionably, there are varying
cultural/geographic perspectives on the matter; yet research indicates that
a significant percentage of Muslims within the Palestinian territories
(46%), Lebanon (29%), and Egypt (24%) share a considerably favorable view
of this crime.  Moreover, international intelligence agencies, including
the Central Intelligence Agency, estimate the percentage of radicalized
Muslims throughout the international community to be anywhere from 15% to
25%.  This is a staggering number, considering that approximately 1.6
billion people identify themselves as Muslim.

For an open and honest dialogue to occur within the West, specifically
within Europe, one must come to terms with the geopolitical atmosphere of
today.  Secularization is a remnant of the French Revolution and has come
to define modern European culture.  A considerable number of Europeans have
shunned the Judeo-Christian values of their past in favor of a
hyper-liberalized, secular mindset.  The problem that has emerged in recent
decades is that their current worldview does not coincide with the influx
of Muslim immigrants from across the Middle East and North Africa that are
making their way into Europe.  Their very existence is defined by religion
and a hyper-conservative worldview.  In essence, Europeans without a clear
identity are attempting to absorb immigrants with a distinct identity.
Within such a fragmented social framework, conflict is inevitable.

This fragmented social framework is epitomized by the left’s tendency to
denigrate the value of religion, particularly Christianity.  Incidentally,
distinctions are made, and many vociferously defend Islam – a religion that
stands in direct opposition to the values that define the liberal
democracies of the West?  It should be noted that homosexual men are
beheaded within Saudi Arabia on a regular basis.  And it’s rather hard to
believe that the left would remain silent, as they currently are regarding
this matter, if roles were reversed and Pope Francis oversaw the beheadings
of homosexuals in Vatican City in an attempt to defend the purity of
Catholicism.

This social framework becomes even more muddled when we factor in the
growing influence of Wahhabism – the absolute and puritanical branch of
Islam that Saudi Arabia is exporting to the world.  The Islamic State,
al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and al-Nusra Front adhere to this
extreme ideological branch of Islam.  Wahhabis do not place value on the
basic tenets of liberal democracy and adhere to a rigid worldview based on
violent jihad and the fulfillment of a caliphate.  A non-believer is simply
a hurdle to be overcome if they are to achieve their goal of establishing
Islam as the pure and universal religion it is meant to be.

The rise of the Islamic State, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and
al-Nusra Front exemplifies the severity of the threat now facing Western
society.  Ghastly acts of terrorism have become the norm, and apologists
have run amuck.  Consequently, the “silent majority” can no longer remain
marginalized and afraid to denounce these social ills.  Political
correctness must be viewed for what it is – a relic of the past.  It is now
a contributing factor to the atmosphere that has emboldened these terror
organizations.  Perhaps there is some validity to the left’s argument that
the jihadists waging war on Western society are simply a “few bad apples.”
 Nevertheless, it is this violent, radicalized mentality driving the agenda
within the Muslim community.  Societal norms need to shift, and a
re-enlightenment must occur within Western society – one in which we
acknowledge the clear and imminent threat that militant Islam presents.  It
is a threat that shows no sign of retreat – and by all indications will
intensify throughout the international community.

*Owen McCormack is a teacher within the New York City Department of
Education.  He holds a Master of Arts degree in history from the City
College of New York and a Master of Science degree in special education
from the College of Staten Island.  He enjoys analyzing the complexities of
today’s social and political issues through a religious/historical prism.
His writing has been featured in TRUTH-OUT.org & Disinformation.com. *


__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcWVldHRhBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjIxMzg5MjA->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYmo3ajUwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyMjEzODkyMA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to