how could it possibly be a religious war ? --- because zionists in America say so.
On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 3:25:13 PM UTC-6, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > > But the official government position is that the middle eastern gentlemen > that need jobs are not Islamic at all. Since they are not Islamic just how > could it possibly be a religious war ? I nor Keith nor anyone we know are > "Zionists nor neocons" yet are in favor of having our tax dollars used to > eradicate the plague. > > > On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 3:19:02 PM UTC-6, plainolamerican wrote: > > you're right ... I have no tolerance for warmongers and those who would > use American tax dollars and weapons on a silly religious war conducted by > neocons and zionists. > > On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 6:18:54 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Plain Ol' wrote: > > fuck you and you're warmongering, you lousy pos. > that you side with genocidal land thieving zionists says tons about your > character. > > > And there you have it. > > The "Kinder, Gentler, More Enlightened, More Tolerant Anti-American > Pro-Islamic Left Of Center" response........ > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:29 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > wrote: > > fuck you and you're warmongering, you lousy pos. > that you side with genocidal land thieving zionists says tons about your > character. > > you want to shed some blood? > bring your favorite weapons, will, body bag, and shitload of your fellow > zionist warmongering IDF pussies ... I'll leave the lights on for ya! > > On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 2:31:55 AM UTC-6, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > > Gee, Plain ol, > > Ever been outside your front door ? Have you ever fought for any cause ? > Do you not believe that freedom to express yourself regardless of faith, > sexual identity, gender or national origin or or or.... Do you not believe > that the strong have a duty to help the weak ? Do you not believe that > there are certain things worth fighting for that transcend the mundane life > of a cloister ? > > Just what is there that you value.... by the standards you have set here > many times for yourself and others you wouldn't lift a finger if the female > members of your own family were being raped in front of you. You claim that > there is no cause worthy of intervention. > > Frankly I am sickened by your gutless and never ending denials that life > and the basic freedoms that every person should have are not worth pursuing > especially if it were to upset your misguided hatred of all things > different from you as you sit in your bubble. > > I could care less that a Jew is a Jew or a Muslim is a Muslim or a > Christian is a Christian... I care a great deal and would definitely shed > my and others blood to see that they all act civilly and with regard for > one another while taking it to them in the extreme when their actions leave > no choice. I don't care if opposing sides kill one another I do care when > innocents are caught in the middle of said conflict, verbal or weaponized. > > It is you that reduces everything to either race, religion, or some other > forms of absolute bigotry that you commonly profess as a reason to stick > your head your ass. > > I truly feel sorry that you have no convictions or principles that you > find compelling. I also pity you. > > On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 10:04:33 AM UTC-6, plainolamerican wrote: > > That's it? That's all you can find to fault? > --- > no that was just half of his first sentence ... the rest is bunk. > > That "The Old Warmonger" chooses to address this terroristic entity as > "The Islamic State" which is the name that they chose for themselves, and > equally true is his premise that President Obama and the Obama > Administration refuse to acknowledge the correlation between Islam and > IS/ISIS/ISIL. > --- > he also doesn't acknowledge the correlation between zionism and their > terrorism in israel. > > So, in a nutshell, you don't like this man telling the truth to the > American public? > --- > I don't like this man because he supports US involvement in zionism's war > with the muzzies. > > I get it Plain Ol'..... > --- > and I get that you would fight unnecessary wars and sacrifice American > interests for israel. > what I don't get is why. > is it because of your religious beliefs? because you can garner work from > the warmongering? because you're on AIPAC's payroll? fear of islam? > please try to explain as I don't want to dislike you because you're > willing to sacrifice American interests for israel. > > On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 9:25:05 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote: > > That's it? That's all you can find to fault? > > That "The Old Warmonger" chooses to address this terroristic entity as > "The Islamic State" which is the name that they chose for themselves, and > equally true is his premise that President Obama and the Obama > Administration refuse to acknowledge the correlation between Islam and > IS/ISIS/ISIL. > > So, in a nutshell, you don't like this man telling the truth to the > American public? > > I get it Plain Ol'..... > > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:19 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > wrote: > > what part of "the "old warmonger's premise is it that you disagree with? > *---* > *let's start with his first sentence ...President Obama’s adamant refusal > to link the barbaric atrocities committed by the Islamic State* > > *isis is not an islamic state ... they are a terrorist organization that > does not represent islam.* > > > *Obama also does not 'link' israel's genocide and land theft to zionism.* > On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 8:54:12 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, what part of "the "old warmonger's premise is it > that you disagree with? > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > wrote: > > YOU BE THE JUDGE > --- > ignore the old warmonger and he'll go away. > > On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 4:28:39 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > *========================================================================* > > *PLEASE PASS FAR AND WIDE. THANK YOU!* > > *========================================================================* > > *[image: cid:2009C01B0A1D4FBDA08D51B1C23E3A7E@dell]* > > *===============================* > > *FREEDOM!* > *===============================* > > *Dennis B, Haney - Lt Col, USAF (Ret)* > > *Wild Weasel #1023* > > *[email protected]* > > *(C) 443-545-4921* > > > *SOS Operations CoordinatorSpecial Operations > Speakswww.SpecialOperationsSpeaks.com > <http://www.SpecialOperationsSpeaks.com>* > > *===============================* > > *[image: cid:AAFC3AC4832B4877807A13C27B9A8D87@dell]* > > *====================================* > > *REMEMBER THE BENGHAZI FOUR* > *====================================* > > > > > > [image: > http://www.aim.org/wp-content/themes/liberal-media-bias/images/aim-logo.gif] > <http://www.aim.org/> > > > > · *Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi* > <http://www.aim.org/benghazi/> > > > America—You be the Judge > > Retired Adm. James A. Lyons — March 2, 2015 > > [image: > http://www.aim.org/wp-content/themes/liberal-media-bias/timthumb.php?src=http://www.aim.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/obamarouhani-1024x683.jpg&w=580&zc=1] > > > > *President Obama’s adamant refusal to link the barbaric atrocities > committed by the Islamic State and affiliated al-Qaeda militias to Islam is > an insult to the intelligence of all thinking Americans. His insistence > that these atrocities are the result of “violent extremism,” not associated > with Islam, lessens his already diminished credibility. The Quran and > Islamic Law (Shariah) prove him wrong since there are 109 verses in the > Quran that can be considered to sanction violence. Furthermore, chapter 2, > verse 106 (on abrogation) makes it clear that the later violent verses take > precedence over the earlier, less violent ones.* > > > > *In February, President Obama hosted a White House Summit on countering > “violent extremism.” As it turned out, it was essentially a public > relations media event that had nothing substantive to offer in terms of > countering the Islamic State’s barbaric acts of terrorism. Instead, it was > more of a leftist, progressive agenda sympathetic to “Islamic sensibilities > and grievances.” It cited lack of education and job opportunities as part > of the root cause that enables IS to attract young Muslims. Mindboggling, > particularly when Christians, women, and children are having their heads > chopped off and are being buried alive.* > > > > *If it were to have been a serious summit, you would have expected the > Director of the FBI and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to be > full participants. However, they were not invited. Instead, the Muslim > Brotherhood (MB) and its front organizations were full participants, > including the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic > Society of North America (ISNA), both unindicted co-conspirators for > funding terrorism from the 2008 Dallas, Texas Holy Land Foundation Trial. > Another MB front organization, the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), > was also represented.* > > > > *The question must be asked: how can the Obama administration continue to > embrace the Muslim Brotherhood when its declared creed, verified by the > FBI, is to destroy the United States from within by our own “miserable > hands,” and replace our Constitution with Islamic “Seventh Century” Shariah > Law?* > > > > *The MB today, with its deep penetration of all our national security and > intelligence agencies, has now been institutionalized. With its carte > blanche entry into the White House, it has, in effect, become a defacto > cabinet member. All Americans should understand that there is no difference > between the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, and the Muslim Brotherhood. Their > objectives are all the same, it’s only the methods they use to achieve it > that may be different. It is a totalitarian ideology bent on world > domination (same as Communism), with Islam the dominant religion and > Shariah the law.* > > > > *The policies of the Obama administration in countering the Islamic > jihadists of IS are clearly confusing to our allies. To understand > President Obama’s strategy, everything this administration does must be > viewed through the prism of his stated objective: to “fundamentally > transform America.” This strategy is clear. It is anti-US and > anti-Western—but pro-Islam, pro-Iran and pro-Muslim Brotherhood. With his > Marxist background, it can be assumed that Obama does not view American > power and influence as a force for good in the world. Otherwise, why would > he want to fundamentally transform America? Therefore, anything that > undercuts US military power and influence is viewed as being “objectively > progressive.” President Obama’s refusal to provide legitimate defensive > weapons to Ukraine falls under this category. The net result is the > emasculation of NATO.* > > > > *The “leading from behind” strategy announced at the start of the Libyan > war, and the unilateral disarmament of our military forces, also fall under > this category. A defining moment in the Libyan war was when the Obama > administration switched sides in the global war on terror > <http://www.aim.org/benghazi/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/CCB-Interim-Report-4-22-2014.pdf> > and > provided weapons and material support to al-Qaeda and MB-controlled > militias. Furthermore, as we now know, the Libyan war was unnecessary since > Muammar Gadhafi was prepared to abdicate.* > > > > *The Middle East today is a disaster area with failed states in Libya, > Iraq, Syria, and now Yemen. What’s astonishing is that we are now a de > facto partner with the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, Iran. By > so doing, we are enhancing the expansion of Iran’s hegemony throughout the > Middle East at the expense of our long term allies—Egypt, Jordan, Israel > and Saudi Arabia.* > > > > *The Obama administration’s precipitous withdrawal from Iraq gave Iran a > clear signal that we would not contest their influence over Iraq. It was a > foolish, or worse, attempt to obtain a nuclear weapons agreement with the > evil Ayatollah Khamenei regime. Today, Iran is already a nuclear threshold > state that has sufficient enriched uranium to make 8 to 12 nuclear weapons > within a few months. Furthermore, a reliable source has informed me that > Iran secretly bought four nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Muslim > Republic of Kazakhstan in 1992. They were said to have been transferred to > Iran and stored in the Lavizan military site near Tehran.* > > > > *More recently, it was reported by Jerome Corsi of WorldNetDaily, on 26 > February, 2015, that Iran is operating another secret advanced, uranium > underground enrichment site northeast of Tehran that was previously unknown > to the International Atomic Energy Agency.* > > > > *With thousands of American lives lost due to Iran’s more than 35 years of > aggression against the United States, it is inconceivable that any American > administration would agree to enter into such a critical agreement, like > the one currently being negotiated with such an evil regime.* > > > > *When you consider all of the above, as well as the Obama administration’s > abuse of power and the many scandals including Benghazi, the IRS, Operation > Fast and Furious, Obamacare, and the immigration fiasco, any other > administration would be brought up on charges of threatening the security > of the United States. America, it’s up to you to influence your > representatives to hold President Obama accountable.* > > > *About the author -* > Retired Adm. James A. Lyons* was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific > Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations. Lyons > is a member of the Citizens' Commission on Benghazi.* > > *======================================================================== > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php>* > *==================================================================* > > *http://www.aim.org/aim-column/america-you-be-the-judge/ > <http://www.aim.org/aim-column/america-you-be-the-judge/>* > > *======================================================================== > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php>**Special > Operations Speaks (SOS), the Special Operations leader in the effort to > uncover the truth about Benghazi, applauds Speaker of the House Boehner for > establishing the House Select Committee on Benghazi. > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php>* > > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php> > > *It has taken over two years to arrive at this point. The right man for > the job of leading the Select Committee, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), has been > given the go-ahead. SOS will support Rep. Gowdy’s search for the truth > about Benghazi in any way that we can. > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php>* > > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php> > > *Much is owed the men who sacrificed their all at Benghazi. This > is especially the case concerning uncovering the truth in getting to the > answers to the critical questions of > <http://t.ymlp291.net/ujsyjakauyubqaaaymaiamjqwb/click.php>* > > ... -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
