Israel, the United States and all perceived enemies of Islam --- correction: zionists and neocons are enemies of islam. it's way past to time to remove them from America's government by any means necessary.
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 2:08:30 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/03/obamas_shariacompliant_truce_with_iran.html > > > > March 10, 2015 > Obama's Sharia-compliant Truce With Iran > > By Nonie Darwish <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/nonie_darwish/> > > It is interesting to see President Obama trying to make a nuclear deal > with Iran because Iran, an Islamic theocracy, must make a deal that is > Sharia compliant. The Obama administration has to know and must feel a need > to work with Iran’s Sharia requirements but is not making the predicament > clear to the American people who are unaware of it. This is why: > > Islamic law places jihad as not only a duty of every Muslim, but more > importantly as the duty of every Muslim head of state. Permanent peace > agreements with non-Muslim countries are forbidden since peace with the > enemies of Islam is not a value, but in fact discouraged and would be > treason if pursued for the purpose of peace. The relationship between > Muslims and non-Muslims, as dictated by Sharia, must remain a hostile one > unless non-Muslims abide by and live under Sharia. True peace with > non-Muslims is forbidden and the only thing allowed is truces that must > never exceed 10 years. > > The Sharia manual of Islamic law *Reliance of the Traveller* > <http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.islamicbulletin.org%2Ffree_downloads%2Fresources%2Freliance2_complete.pdf&ei=ier9VKqOLYadgwTskoOQDg&usg=AFQjCNGHu8bTqzDceu-JiUAQ4XxqoZ8r6A>, > > page 604-605, clearly states that only a truce, defined as cessation of > violence, is “permissible but not obligatory.” In the Arabic original text, > the word peace was never used to describe a truce, but in the English > translation a truce is said to mean “a peace treaty with those hostile to > Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period.” It is > also important to note that the Arabic text call the people against whom > Muslims are fighting as “Ahl El Harb > <http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Dar_al-Harb>” meaning people of war, or those > who live in land of war (non-Muslim land) but in the English translation > they are described as “those hostile to Islam.” > > According to sharia “only the caliph (Muslim head of state) may effect a > truce, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence because it entails the > nonperformance of jihad.” Again here Sharia emphasizes the gravity and > illegitimacy of ending violence and stopping jihad with Islam’s perceived > enemies and the importance of never allowing peace to penetrate the Islamic > state relationship with non-Muslim groups or nations. > > Sharia clearly discourages truces unless it is beneficial for Islam, > “There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere > preservation of the status quo,” it is said in English, but in Arabic it > says “Truces should never be made just to end fighting.” Then it continues > quoting from the Quran a verse on peace and its conditions: “So do not be > fainthearted and call for peace, when you are the upper most.” Meaning that > when Muslims are strong and have the upper hand they must not seek a truce > or peace. > > According to Sharia (*Traveller*, page 987) it is an enormity sin, > punishable by death, for “a Muslim to flee from combat (jihad) against > unbelievers” because of fear of getting killed, unless one is falling back > to regroup regain strength and reinforcement. Truces in that sense should > never be done for the sake of peace or to escape jihad. > > A truce must be justified for a reason such as Muslim weakness because of > lack of numbers or material, or in the hope of an enemy (non-Muslims) > becoming Muslim. *Traveller*'s page 605 states that “If Muslims are weak, > a truce may be made for ten years if necessary… It is not permissible to > stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does > not exceed ten years.” > > It is clear that Iran’s wish to make a deal with the U.S. regarding its > nuclear program is because of its feeling of weakness both internally from > the economic standpoint and externally with the West and the many Sunni > Arab enemies. For Obama the deal will show his critics that he has done > something to stop Iran’s nuclear program, while in reality he is only > kicking the can down to the next administration. > > Benjamin Netanyahu and critics of Obama’s deal with Iran are right. Iran > is following Sharia to the letter; it recognizes that it is now weak and > desperately needs a 10-year Islamic fake peace, called a truce, to regroup, > regain, and rebuild its military and economic strength while continuing > its secret activities. After the lifting of the sanctions, Iran’s economy > will improve and its control over its citizens will be strengthened, ending > any hope for an uprising. In a few years Iran will regain its legitimacy > among the nations of the world and will build an image of moderation only > to start a new round of terror against Israel and the U.S. who should not > be shocked this time by a Shiite style 9/11 after being kept in the dark > for 10 years and shielded from the sharia proof plan. > > The West must recognize that incrementalism has worked very well > historically for both Shiite and Sunni Islam for over 1400 years, and 10 > years is the sharia requirement. Iran does not have to noticeably violate > the sharia-compliant truce with Obama since the deal has a sunset clause > removing all restrictions and sanctions on Iran to develop its nuclear > program after 10 years. > > Even if Iran gets as far as 10-years compliance, it is guaranteed they > will attack in earnest with complete terror and devastation because they > would have obeyed Islamic law’s objective of annihilation of non-Muslim > enemies, both Israel, the United States and all perceived enemies of Islam > in their land, the land of war. > > *Nonie Darwish, author **The Devil We Don’t Know and founder of Former > Muslims United.* > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcWg0ZDY3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjYwMDk5OTQ-> > > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYXNnNWdzBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyNjAwOTk5NA--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
