There's no doubt, at least in my mind, that Hil Clinton's Presser the other day was typical of hers and her Husband's consistent lying and ability (in their minds) of "Weathering the Storm". Clinton at a minimum was caught in more than a handful of lies!
What's unfortunate, is that I believe they may in fact be right. I don't see a lot of consequences becoming HIl Clinton. On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/03/hillary_and_state_department_intelligence.html > > > > March 12, 2015 > Hillary and State Department intelligence > > By Jonathan Keiler > <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/jonathan_keiler/> > > How likely is it that all of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails were free of > classified material? Not very. Though it’s not widely known, the State > Department has a Bureau of Intelligence and Research that is as much a part > of the intelligence community as the CIA or DIA and works in the same > highly restricted, security-conscious environment. All those CIA agents > with State Department cover have to get it somewhere, and diplomats have > always been important pieces in the collection and evaluation of > intelligence, some of it very highly classified. > > I worked for State’s BIR right after I graduated from college in the early > 1980s as a low-level intelligence clerk. Everybody had a top-secret > clearance, and security in that part of the building was maintained at an > extremely high level. Among the analysts I worked with, one of the most > sought after professional accomplishments was to get a bit of one’s > work-product into the secretary’s morning summary, which was a compilation > of important international developments and analysis of immediate > interest. Some of that summary, pretty much on a daily basis, originated > in the BIR, and most everything that came out of the BIR was classified at > some level. I’m sure something similar still goes on there, though instead > of literally cutting and pasting the summary together, it’s done > electronically. > > There would not be much point in the secretary getting this information if > he/she had no intention of using it. But to use it, you have to reference > it in some way, whether speaking, sending an old-fashioned letter, or, more > commonly in the last twenty years, via e-mail. Referencing classified > information, even if you are not actually sharing the document from which > the information originated, may still be a breach of security protocols. > Many documents are classified for sources and methods, not necessarily the > information contained therein. But citing that information in an unsecure > manner, which might then become available to foreign intelligence, could > indicate to a foreign government that they have a security breach, which > can endanger sources and methods. Or in some cases, the substantive > information itself is sensitive and classified accordingly. > > It’s pretty hard to believe that in all her years at State, Hillary > Clinton never referenced classified material in her thousands of e-mails. > Nobody would believe that of the director of the CIA. And the State BIR is > part of the same intelligence community, and was an important part of > Hillary’s domain. Sure, many if not most of her e-mails probably dealt > with the drudgery of running a large bureaucracy – what new carpeting to > put on the 7th floor, staffing the cafeteria, and so on. But nobody > becomes secretary of state to do that. The hot policy stuff, a good bit of > which is classified, is what’s interesting. It’s what Hillary wrote about > in her e-mails. It’s probably what she deleted. > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOTBuZjdwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjYxODQzMzc-> > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYmVoY2Q0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyNjE4NDMzNw--> > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe > <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms > of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
