*Hillary Clinton's Nixon moment*

*image: http://jewishworldreview.com/cols2/pruden.new.jpg
<http://jewishworldreview.com/cols2/pruden.new.jpg>*



*By Wesley Pruden *

*Published March 10, 2015*

image: http://media.cagle.com/89/2015/03/04/160924_600.jpg?ref=relatedBox

[image: Hillary Clinton's Nixon moment]

That ominous noise in the rafters above the heads of Bubba and the missus
is the creaking of a roof trying not to collapse. The weight of the years
is just about more than the roof can stand.

Hillary's emails, which last week were an irritant, have become an
annoyance that threatens to become a problem that could become catastrophe.
Her allies on Capitol Hill and her friends in the media haven't bailed, not
yet, but suddenly the allies have a case of the nerves, like a man in the
theater who gets a whiff of what he thinks may be smoke and starts looking
to locate the exits.

The Washington Post wonders whether her experience, until now a major
selling point, might actually be a liability. Anyone with her experience
should have recognized the warning signs. London's Financial Times, looking
this way from across the sea, finds evidence of "Clinton fatigue." The New
York Times reports more in sorrow than anger (though there's a hint of
that, too) that the bright days for the inevitable president have darkened
considerably.

There's speculation in Congress that she could face criminal charges for
the curious management of her emails. The White House concedes, with more
rue than repentance, that President Obama corresponded with her through her
suspect email account, the account she used to conduct official business so
her messages wouldn't be vulnerable to official inquiries.

Many a young man has been counseled to "wrong no man and write to no
woman," and now, in the age of equality, it turns out that such a warning
should be for the ladies, too.

The wise men and women surrounding Hillary, who have hidden her in a dark
place since the story broke first in The New York Times more than a week
ago, are divided now about whether this is the right time for her to come
out of hiding to answer questions.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein tells her to "step up" and "come forward." Bloomberg
News, citing "three sources with knowledge of her team's plan," says
Hillary adopted "the time-tested Clinton approach" to say as little as
possible, feed the media a little meat (mostly gristle), and lie and wait
for the inevitable new news cycle. "It just makes sense to settle in for a
little bit," says one of Bloomberg's three sources, "people have very short
memories."

But hunkering down to let the storm subside, only works if there's nothing
else coming. With the Clintons, there's always something coming.

Hunkering down was the point of Hillary releasing 55,000 pages of emails
last week, but the gesture was transparent and no one was fooled. Everyone
knew she wouldn't have let fly with 55,000 emails unless she knew there was
nothing fatally incriminating in them. Proving there's nothing to hide only
works if there's nothing to hide. So far the strategy — "move along now,
there's nothing here to see" — has clearly not worked.

Some of her friends are trying to help, but may be making things worse.
"The energy in this story is enormously defused by committing to release
emails in some form or fashion," Chris Lehane, who managed the Clinton
White House response to Whitewater and "the bimbo eruptions" that led to
Monica Lewinsky, insists the Whitewater and Monica allegations, and the
surrounding circus, were "far more serious."

Paul Begala, a veteran of dealing with the fibs and stretchers in the
Clinton White House, reaches to measure the velocity and intensity of the
current allegations with metaphors from the outhouse. "Voters do not give
[doo-doo] about what email Hillary used," he tells CNN News. "They do not
even give a [burst of flatulence]."

No doubt true, but what worries the Democrats on the Hill is not the size
of the email story now, but the size of what is likely more to come.

Everybody understands sex and money. Bubba discovered money only recently,
and under the tutelage of the missus. Back home in Arkansas, if he had
enough money in his pocket for a Big Mac, a bucket of fries and a compliant
lady with big hair, that was enough.

Hillary, however, is about money. Bubba defends the Clinton Foundation, the
legal name for Bubba, Hillary and Chelsea, for taking big money from
foreign governments with reputations for treating women like a clutch of
soiled Kleenex. Neither Bubba nor Hillary say they like what those
countries do but they do like the color of their money. If those
governments expect special consideration from Hillary as president merely
for sending her a few millions now, what difference, at this point, does it
make? The rafters creak.


Read more at
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/pruden031015.php3#HQ7ZcgYqilLQz8KQ.99




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYWhpNmZpBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjY2MjAzMjQ->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbmhlb2g3BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyNjYyMDMyNA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to