"You can look at my deeds. Because over the last three years, as president of the United States, I have kept my commitments to the state of Israel. At every crucial juncture - at every fork in the road - we have been there for Israel. Every single time.
Four years ago, I stood before you and said that, “Israel’s security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable.” That belief has guided my actions as president. The fact is my administration’s commitment to Israel’s security has been unprecedented. Our military and intelligence cooperation has never been closer. Our joint exercises and training have never been more robust. Despite a tough budget environment, our security assistance has increased every single year. We are investing in new capabilities. We’re providing Israel with more advanced technology - the types of products and systems that only go to our closest friends and allies. And make no mistake: We will do what it takes to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge - because Israel must always have the ability to defend itself, by itself, against any threat." - Obama to the warmongering zionists and neocons at AIPAC. On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:24:48 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > *The Question of Obama’s Allegiances* > > Posted By *David Meir-Levi* On March 20, 2015 > > Since before his first term, our President’s words and deeds regarding the > Middle East, Jihad, and the Israel-Arab conflict have been confusing. > > At first some thought him an incompetent amateur > <http://edwardklein.com/the-amateur/>, especially regarding his > heavy-handed “reset” of America’s relationship with the Muslim world and > with Russia. But many of our presidents have made errors at the onset and > then later matured into office. > > Then he seemed to be merely a self-absorbed ego-centric narcissist > <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/charles-krauthammer-barack-obama-narcissist-110975.html>, > > especially regarding his proclivity for golf vacations during crises. But > most of our presidents seem to have been able to separate their personal > predilections from their role as leader of the free world. > > Then some opined that he was blinded by political correctness > <http://cnsnews.com/commentary/dr-richard-land/obama-administration-deluded-and-blinded-political-correctness>, > > especially regarding his *ex-cathedra*pronouncements about not implying > any connection between Islam and terrorism. But many seemed to think that > his concern for the well-being of our Muslim-American citizens, and for the > otherwise globally besmirched reputation of supposedly peace-loving Islam, > was an appropriate and necessary position in order to uphold American > values of tolerance and protection for minorities. > > Then he appeared to be simply ignorant > <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-giuliani-obama-refusal-to-recognize-radical-islam-horribly-ignorant-20150219-embeddedvideo.html> > of > the historical realities of Islam’s commitment to global jihad > <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/22/obama-lives-in-ignorance-of-islamic-threat/> > “…until there is no worship > <http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/013-forced-conversion.htm> except > for Allah,” or perhaps too easily swayed by the gaggle of advisors who > surround him. But here one must stop and ask the obvious question: How > ignorant about Islam could he be, having himself grown up as a Muslim in a > majority-Muslim country? > > And one must also note that it was he who selected those advisors. > > Nearly a dozen of his appointees to important and even critical government > posts are people with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood > <http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/02/07/the-muslim-brotherhood-comes-to-the-white-house/>. > > In addition there is Huma Abedin > <http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/030615-742440-huma-abedin-hillary-clinton-private-emails.htm>, > > a very close confidant to Hillary Clinton, and her connections > <http://www.americadeathwatch.com/islamism-influence-in-white-house.php> to > the Muslim Brotherhood are well documented. And then there is Valerie > Jarrett, “Obama’s Rasputin” > <http://www.westernjournalism.com/heres-reason-valerie-jarrett-scared-benjamin-netanyahu/#hTTrZ5QvfJLP0Vbw.97> > (who > is neither Iranian nor Muslim > <http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/v/Valerie-Jarrett-is-a-Muslim-and-Controls-the-White-House.htm#.VPryPjh0z4g>, > > but seems to hold unconscionable sway > <http://conservativetribune.com/valerie-jarrett-iran/> over the Obama > White House and may be the real brains behind Obama’s current policy toward > Iran). How deeply have they penetrated, what secrets do they know, how > badly has our country’s security been compromised? > > And he appointed them <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vZg_DJtc0w>. No > “guilt by association” here. > > The confusion regarding our President’s lax and accommodating attitude and > policy toward individuals, terrorist organizations and governments that are > unequivocally aligned with our nation’s enemies, some of which have > declared war on us, can be dispelled if we analyze his behavior over the > last two years. > > During the “Arab Spring” he promptly abandoned Hosni Mubarak, a long-time > American ally. Then he supported Mohammed Morsi who became President of > Egypt in 2012, even though Morsi represented the Muslim Brotherhood, which > supports Hamas and other Arab anti-American and anti-Israel terror > organizations, and which has as its eternal mission the subjugation of all > non-Muslim nations and peoples to Islam, via jihad. He then did his best to > undermine Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi, who took over from Morsi in a wildly > popular coup, even though el-Sisi quickly proved himself the enemy of the > Brotherhood and of the Al-Qaeda and of the ISIS forces that had ensconced > themselves in the Sinai Peninsula. > > He retreated repeatedly from his “red lines” in Syria, resulting in the > death of hundreds of thousands of Syrian civilians and facilitating the > extension of Iranian hegemony from Iraq to Syria and the Mediterranean Sea, > thus bringing into Iran’s cross-hairs the countries of North Africa, > Israel, Turkey, Eastern Europe and even the eastern flank of Western Europe. > > As quickly as he abandoned Mubarak in Egypt, he abandoned the Yemeni > government to a Houthi victory. The Houthi are supported by Iran, whose > victory in Yemen means the extension of Iranian control to both sides of > the Persian Gulf, the waterway through which half of the world’s oil flows. > > In July, 2014, during Israel’s defensive operation against Hamas, Obama > telephoned Netanyahu to announce that he wanted an unconditional > “humanitarian” cease-fire > <http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Our-world-Israel-Hamas-and-Obamas-foreign-policy-369338> > that > would lead to a permanent one. The terms of such a cease-fire would include > opening Gaza’s borders with Egypt and Israel and ending Israel’s maritime > blockade of the Gaza coast. Such terms would allow Hamas to quickly rebuild > its arsenal, starting with $47 million dollars of US financial support, > purchase more missiles from North Korea, and import more building materials > to reconstruct its tunnels. In short, Obama sided openly, intentionally, > willfully, and forcefully with Hamas, against Israel, and against America’s > long-time Sunni Arab allies – Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United > Arab Emirates. Such an agreement means that Hamas wins big-time; and > Israel, America’s ally, loses. > > This past February, our President openly supported Qatar > <http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5269/terrorism-supporters-obama> despite > Qatar’s long history of supporting Hamas with arms and money, hosting > al-Jazeera, and recently supplying arms to ISIS terrorists in Libya. But John > Kerry said > <http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2015/02/24/Iran-contributed-to-collapse-of-Yemen-govt-Kerry.html> > that > he was aware of Qatar’s history, so Obama must also be aware, and chooses > to support Qatar anyway. That is a choice in favor of America’s enemies. > > And our President has made a similar choice in his prolonged negotiations > with Iran, even as the Ayatollahs crossed one after another of Obama’s “red > lines” and announced repeatedly > <http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13931217001220> their > intention to develop their nuclear capacities and their missile delivery > system. Rather than preventing Iran’s quest for deployable nuclear arms, > Obama has facilitated <https://m.youtube.com/watch?sns=fb&v=E0hUtumtQpA> > it. > > And now he is further facilitating Iran’s ascension to regional hegemony > <http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/05/iran-nuclear-bush-obama/> and > nuclear power by ignoring Iran’s backing of the Assad regime, Hezbollah, > and the growing number of Iranian generals and military experts who are > operating > in the Golan Heights > <http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/2/20/israel-on-edge-as-hezbollah-iran-move-on-golan-heights.html> > along > the border with Israel. That is another choice in favors our allies’ enemy. > > Finally, his recently proposed strategy to combat global Jihad’s threat to > Western Civilization offers the last and perhaps most important insight > into what Obama is really doing. A full-jihadist-employment program > <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2957350/State-Department-says-win-war-against-ISIS-killing-Obama-administration-avoids-mention-Christian-beheading-victims-religion-launches-new-hashtag-diplomacy-effort.html> > that > will bring “Hope and Change” to the world’s worst psychopathic murderers, > even as they extend their hegemony over Libya which they promise will be > their launching pad for their invasion of the rest of Western Europe, is > not his “..lamest attempt at some sort of strategy.” It is not his “entry > into the twilight zone > <http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/03/09/jobs-for-jihadists-mr-obama-poverty-doesnt-create-terrorism-ideology-does/>.” > > Rather it is an overt statement of his true ideology, an ideology of which > he gave only an obscure hint in a speech last year in which he warned us > all that America must be careful to always be “…on the right side of > history…” when it comes to our dealings with the Muslim world; but in Muslim > parlance the right side of history is Allah’s side. > <http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/there-is-no-modern-islam/> > > His is an ideology that requires that he whitewash the most horrific > manifestations > <http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/joseph-klein/obama-whitewashes-iranian-terrorism/?utm_source=FrontPage+Magazine&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1bd65a5bd5-Mailchimp_FrontPageMag&utm_term=0_57e32c1dad-1bd65a5bd5-156506517> > of > Islamofascism, explain them away, excuse, or deny their very existence in > order to direct our attention away from the dire existential threat that > they pose. But whitewashing evil is complicity with evil, and complicity > with evil is evil. How can our Commander-in-Chief, the leader of the > Western World, the single most powerful person on the planet, collude so > openly with those who are working so furiously to obliterate us? > > He cannot be so naïve > <http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5391/france-iran-talks> or so ignorant > that he does not know that ISIS is indeed an Islamic terrorist > organization, that Islamic terrorism arises not from unemployment but from > Islamic ideology, and that an Iran armed with nuclear warheads and a > 2,500-kilometer missile delivery system poses a threat to the entire world: > a threat that has already begun to spark a nuclear arms race in the Middle > East which could end in “mutually assured destruction,” the threat of which > reined in the world’s nuclear powers during the Cold War but seems > irrelevant to the Armageddon mentality of the Ayatollahs. And if he is > neither naïve nor ignorant about the dangers to our country and to the > world that his policy toward Islamic fascism has helped to create, then why > does he support those who pose that threat? > > Caroline Glick came the closest to connecting the dots to their terrifying > but undeniable conclusion when she opined that Obama may be acting out of > anti-Semitism, or perhaps even out of sympathy > <http://carolineglick.com/mainstreaming-jew-hatred-in-america/> for > Islamic fascism. But “acting out of sympathy” does not quite connect us to > that final dot. Sympathy alone is inadequate to explain his facilitating, > enabling, obfuscating, whitewashing, and congenially interacting with > Islamofascist extremists. There can be only one explanation for his > otherwise unexplainable series of decisions and statements that have > supported or even facilitated Islamic fascism’s expansion. > > What other explanation can there be other than that he wants the Jihadists > to win? > > What other explanation can there be but that he actually wants Iran to > achieve nuclear capacity, to surround Sunni Islam in the Fertile Crescent, > to reign as a supreme regional hegemon, armed with atomic weapons, > controlling the Straits of Hormuz, and equipped to fulfill the jihadist > dream of obliterating Israel and annihilating another 6,000,000 Jews? > > What other explanation can there be but that he does not merely sympathize > with Islamic fascism, but that he is at one with the ideologically driven > psychotic murderers who seek to destroy all of western civilization and > replace it with the 7th century barbarism that they call “true Islam”? > > What other explanation can there be but that our president is fighting on > the side of our enemies, and that he is, therefore, committing treason? > > *Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: **Click here* > <http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=david+horowitz&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&qid=1316459840&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&sort=daterank> > *.* > > *Subscribe* <https://www.youtube.com/user/TheFMPMG/featured>* to > Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, on **YouTube* > <https://www.youtube.com/user/TheFMPMG/featured>* and **LIKE* > <https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang>* it on **Facebook.* > <https://www.facebook.com/glazovgang> > ------------------------------ > > Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: *http://www.frontpagemag.com > <http://www.frontpagemag.com>* > > URL to article: > *http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/david-meir-levi/the-question-of-obamas-allegiances/ > > <http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/david-meir-levi/the-question-of-obamas-allegiances/>* > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmb2dua2F0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjcxMzgyMDU-> > > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcnBuYmpmBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyNzEzODIwNQ--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
