*Ed Schroeder’s Military Intelligence Report: A Former Top Adviser
Destroyed Obama’s Iraq Policy in One Sentence*
<https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/ed-schroeders-military-intelligence-report-a-former-top-adviser-destroyed-obamas-iraq-policy-in-one-sentence/>

by ******
<https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/author/lhmscadet/>

[image: A former top adviser destroyed Obama's Iraq policy in one sentence]

*Emma Sky, second from left, accompanying Gen. Ray Odierno, center, on a
visit to a local market in Khalis, Iraq, in January 2009."If only Obama had
paid attention to Iraq ... But his only interest in Iraq was in ending the
war." —Emma Sky, former aide to the top US commander in Iraq*

Emma Sky is no warmonger. She is a British, Oxford-educated political
analyst who served as a humanitarian worker in the Middle East for a decade
before helping the US rebuild Iraq.

And her new book, "*The Unraveling: High Hopes and Missed Opportunities in
Iraq*
<http://www.amazon.com/The-Unraveling-Hopes-Missed-Opportunities/dp/161039593X>,"
is not kind to the Obama administration's handling of Iraq.

>From 2007 to 2010, Sky was the political adviser to US Gen. Ray Odierno
when he served as deputy American commander in Iraq and then the US-led
mission's top commander. During Sky's time with Odierno, violence in the
country plummeted after a US troop surge and crucial Sunni tribal
cooperation stabilized the country.

Odierno "wanted US engagement with Iraq to continue for years to come, but
led by US civilians, not the military," Sky wrote, according to a book
excerpt *published in Politico*
<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/04/obama-iraq-116708.html#.VS2Sh5TF8QI>.
"He believed that, in order to train Iraqi security forces and provide the
psychological support needed to maintain a level of stability, 20,000 or so
US troops needed to stay in Iraq beyond 2011."

The Obama administration, however, eventually *went along with the plan*
<http://www.businessinsider.com/the-back-room-deal-that-explains-the-chaos-in-iraq-2014-6>
backed by Qassem Suleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's
Quds Force. That plan called for no US troops beyond 2011 and relied on the
continued support of the authoritarian Iran-backed regime of Nouri
al-Maliki, then Iraq's prime minister.

"Iran's goal was to ensure that Iraq was not integrated into the Arab
world, instead becoming a close ally of Iran," Sky wrote. "Maliki would be
able to achieve this because all the neighboring Sunni countries hated him."

Obama *called*
<http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/14/barack-obama-iraq-war-success>
the removal of the last US troops from Iraq in December 2011 a "historic"
moment, adding that the country they were leaving behind was "an
extraordinary achievement."

Given the state of war-torn Iraq today, history has been unkind to that
assessment.

)ISIS areas of operating control as of April 2015.Ali Khedery, the longest
continuously serving US official during the Iraq war (2003 to 2009), *has
said*
<http://www.businessinsider.com/worst-case-scenario-in-the-middle-east-2014-8>
America's continued support of Maliki in December 2010 made it so that
"Iraq's path toward civil war was really inevitable."

That's because Maliki's new lease on life led him to steer Baghdad "toward
a very pro-Iranian and sectarian agenda, which inevitably disillusioned and
disenfranchised Sunni Arabs for a second time."

The rise and resilience of the Islamic State, also called ISIS or ISIL,
which rampaged across northern Iraq from neighboring Syria last summer, is
partly a manifestation of this *Sunni discontent*
<http://www.businessinsider.com/why-some-secular-sunnis-support-isis-2015-3>
.

At this point, the militant group is "fundamentally a form of Sunni-power
political projection," *as explained by Michael Weiss*
<http://www.ipinst.org/2015/04/weiss-understanding-the-rise-of-isis#8>,
coauthor of "*ISIS: Inside the Terror Army*
<http://www.amazon.com/ISIS-Inside-Terror-Michael-Weiss/dp/1941393578>."

In 2010, however, those in charge of the administration's policy — namely,
ambassador Christopher Hill and Vice President Joe Biden — saw the
trajectory of US policy differently.

Sky described a visit to Iraq from Biden at the end of August 2010:

"Biden had been persuaded by the arguments that there was no one but Maliki
who could be prime minister and that he would sign a new security agreement
with the United States," Sky wrote in the Politico excerpt, noting later
that the security agreement was never signed.

"The Obama administration wanted to see an Iraqi government in place before
the US midterm elections in November," Sky said. "Biden believed the
quickest way to form a government was to keep Maliki as prime minister and
to cajole other Iraqis into accepting this."

Despite the best efforts of Sky and her colleagues, she could not convince
the administration otherwise.

"Biden was a nice man, but he simply had the wrong instincts on Iraq," Sky
writes, according to a *snippet published in The Wall Street Journal*
<http://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-the-unraveling-by-emma-sky-1428967690>.
"If only Obama had paid attention to Iraq ... But his only interest in Iraq
was in ending the war."

Tim Arango, the Baghdad bureau chief for The New York Times, *told Reddit
in September*
<http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2fu159/im_tim_arango_baghdad_bureau_chief_for_the_new/?sort=confidence>
that "after 2011 the administration basically ignored the country. And when
officials spoke about what was happening there they were often ignorant of
the reality."

For the region, the administration's choices seem to signal an accusation
that would become part of Obama's foreign-policy legacy.

"In the Arabic media, there was confusion as to why the United States and
Iran should both choose Maliki as prime minister, and this fueled
conspiracy theories about a secret deal between those two countries," Sky
noted.

***** <https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/author/lhmscadet/>*
| April 15, 2015 at 10:11 am | Categories: *Uncategorized*
<https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/?cat=1> | URL:
*http://wp.me/p2gQDJ-1j4* <http://wp.me/p2gQDJ-1j4>

Comment
<https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/ed-schroeders-military-intelligence-report-a-former-top-adviser-destroyed-obamas-iraq-policy-in-one-sentence/#respond>

   *See all comments*
<https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/ed-schroeders-military-intelligence-report-a-former-top-adviser-destroyed-obamas-iraq-policy-in-one-sentence/#comments>



*Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
*https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/ed-schroeders-military-intelligence-report-a-former-top-adviser-destroyed-obamas-iraq-policy-in-one-sentence/*
<https://militarywritersassociation.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/ed-schroeders-military-intelligence-report-a-former-top-adviser-destroyed-obamas-iraq-policy-in-one-sentence/>





Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com>



__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMnI3cWh0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjkxMTA5Mjc->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaTc4dGtlBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyOTExMDkyNw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to