http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903480904576512250915629460
Why Software Is Eating The World

By Marc Andreessen

August 20, 2011

This week, Hewlett-Packard (where I am on the board) announced that it is
exploring jettisoning its struggling PC business in favor of investing more
heavily in software, where it sees better potential for growth. Meanwhile,
Google plans to buy up the cellphone handset maker Motorola Mobility. Both
moves surprised the tech world. But both moves are also in line with a
trend I've observed, one that makes me optimistic about the future growth
of the American and world economies, despite the recent turmoil in the
stock market.

In short, software is eating the world.

More than 10 years after the peak of the 1990s dot-com bubble, a dozen or
so new Internet companies like Facebook and Twitter are sparking
controversy in Silicon Valley, due to their rapidly growing private market
valuations, and even the occasional successful IPO. With scars from the
heyday of Webvan and Pets.com still fresh in the investor psyche, people
are asking, "Isn't this just a dangerous new bubble?"

I, along with others, have been arguing the other side of the case. (I am
co-founder and general partner of venture capital firm Andreessen-Horowitz,
which has invested in Facebook, Groupon, Skype, Twitter, Zynga, and
Foursquare, among others. I am also personally an investor in LinkedIn.) We
believe that many of the prominent new Internet companies are building
real, high-growth, high-margin, highly defensible businesses.

Today's stock market actually hates technology, as shown by all-time low
price/earnings ratios for major public technology companies. Apple, for
example, has a P/E ratio of around 15.2—about the same as the broader stock
market, despite Apple's immense profitability and dominant market position
(Apple in the last couple weeks became the biggest company in America,
judged by market capitalization, surpassing Exxon Mobil). And, perhaps most
telling, you can't have a bubble when people are constantly screaming
"Bubble!"

But too much of the debate is still around financial valuation, as opposed
to the underlying intrinsic value of the best of Silicon Valley's new
companies. My own theory is that we are in the middle of a dramatic and
broad technological and economic shift in which software companies are
poised to take over large swathes of the economy.

More and more major businesses and industries are being run on software and
delivered as online services—from movies to agriculture to national
defense. Many of the winners are Silicon Valley-style entrepreneurial
technology companies that are invading and overturning established industry
structures. Over the next 10 years, I expect many more industries to be
disrupted by software, with new world-beating Silicon Valley companies
doing the disruption in more cases than not.

Why is this happening now?

Six decades into the computer revolution, four decades since the invention
of the microprocessor, and two decades into the rise of the modern
Internet, all of the technology required to transform industries through
software finally works and can be widely delivered at global scale.

Over two billion people now use the broadband Internet, up from perhaps 50
million a decade ago, when I was at Netscape, the company I co-founded. In
the next 10 years, I expect at least five billion people worldwide to own
smartphones, giving every individual with such a phone instant access to
the full power of the Internet, every moment of every day.

On the back end, software programming tools and Internet-based services
make it easy to launch new global software-powered start-ups in many
industries—without the need to invest in new infrastructure and train new
employees. In 2000, when my partner Ben Horowitz was CEO of the first cloud
computing company, Loudcloud, the cost of a customer running a basic
Internet application was approximately $150,000 a month. Running that same
application today in Amazon's cloud costs about $1,500 a month.

With lower start-up costs and a vastly expanded market for online services,
the result is a global economy that for the first time will be fully
digitally wired—the dream of every cyber-visionary of the early 1990s,
finally delivered, a full generation later.

Perhaps the single most dramatic example of this phenomenon of software
eating a traditional business is the suicide of Borders and corresponding
rise of Amazon. In 2001, Borders agreed to hand over its online business to
Amazon under the theory that online book sales were non-strategic and
unimportant.

Oops.

Today, the world's largest bookseller, Amazon, is a software company—its
core capability is its amazing software engine for selling virtually
everything online, no retail stores necessary. On top of that, while
Borders was thrashing in the throes of impending bankruptcy, Amazon
rearranged its web site to promote its Kindle digital books over physical
books for the first time. Now even the books themselves are software.

Today's largest video service by number of subscribers is a software
company: Netflix. How Netflix eviscerated Blockbuster is an old story, but
now other traditional entertainment providers are facing the same threat.
Comcast, Time Warner and others are responding by transforming themselves
into software companies with efforts such as TV Everywhere, which liberates
content from the physical cable and connects it to smartphones and tablets.

Today's dominant music companies are software companies, too: Apple's
iTunes, Spotify and Pandora. Traditional record labels increasingly exist
only to provide those software companies with content. Industry revenue
from digital channels totaled $4.6 billion in 2010, growing to 29% of total
revenue from 2% in 2004.

Today's fastest growing entertainment companies are videogame makers—again,
software—with the industry growing to $60 billion from $30 billion five
years ago. And the fastest growing major videogame company is Zynga (maker
of games including FarmVille), which delivers its games entirely online.
Zynga's first-quarter revenues grew to $235 million this year, more than
double revenues from a year earlier. Rovio, maker of Angry Birds, is
expected to clear $100 million in revenue this year (the company was nearly
bankrupt when it debuted the popular game on the iPhone in late 2009).
Meanwhile, traditional videogame powerhouses like Electronic Arts and
Nintendo have seen revenues stagnate and fall.

The best new movie production company in many decades, Pixar, was a
software company. Disney—Disney!—had to buy Pixar, a software company, to
remain relevant in animated movies.

Photography, of course, was eaten by software long ago. It's virtually
impossible to buy a mobile phone that doesn't include a software-powered
camera, and photos are uploaded automatically to the Internet for permanent
archiving and global sharing. Companies like Shutterfly, Snapfish and
Flickr have stepped into Kodak's place.

Today's largest direct marketing platform is a software company—Google. Now
it's been joined by Groupon, Living Social, Foursquare and others, which
are using software to eat the retail marketing industry. Groupon generated
over $700 million in revenue in 2010, after being in business for only two
years.

Today's fastest growing telecom company is Skype, a software company that
was just bought by Microsoft for $8.5 billion. CenturyLink, the third
largest telecom company in the U.S., with a $20 billion market cap, had 15
million access lines at the end of June 30—declining at an annual rate of
about 7%. Excluding the revenue from its Qwest acquisition, CenturyLink's
revenue from these legacy services declined by more than 11%. Meanwhile,
the two biggest telecom companies, AT&T and Verizon, have survived by
transforming themselves into software companies, partnering with Apple and
other smartphone makers.

LinkedIn is today's fastest growing recruiting company. For the first time
ever, on LinkedIn, employees can maintain their own resumes for recruiters
to search in real time—giving LinkedIn the opportunity to eat the lucrative
$400 billion recruiting industry.

Software is also eating much of the value chain of industries that are
widely viewed as primarily existing in the physical world. In today's cars,
software runs the engines, controls safety features, entertains passengers,
guides drivers to destinations and connects each car to mobile, satellite
and GPS networks. The days when a car aficionado could repair his or her
own car are long past, due primarily to the high software content. The
trend toward hybrid and electric vehicles will only accelerate the software
shift—electric cars are completely computer controlled. And the creation of
software-powered driverless cars is already under way at Google and the
major car companies.

Today's leading real-world retailer, Wal-Mart, uses software to power its
logistics and distribution capabilities, which it has used to crush its
competition. Likewise for FedEx, which is best thought of as a software
network that happens to have trucks, planes and distribution hubs attached.
And the success or failure of airlines today and in the future hinges on
their ability to price tickets and optimize routes and yields
correctly—with software.

Oil and gas companies were early innovators in supercomputing and data
visualization and analysis, which are crucial to today's oil and gas
exploration efforts. Agriculture is increasingly powered by software as
well, including satellite analysis of soils linked to per-acre seed
selection software algorithms.

The financial services industry has been visibly transformed by software
over the last 30 years. Practically every financial transaction, from
someone buying a cup of coffee to someone trading a trillion dollars of
credit default derivatives, is done in software. And many of the leading
innovators in financial services are software companies, such as Square,
which allows anyone to accept credit card payments with a mobile phone, and
PayPal, which generated more than $1 billion in revenue in the second
quarter of this year, up 31% over the previous year.

Health care and education, in my view, are next up for fundamental
software-based transformation. My venture capital firm is backing
aggressive start-ups in both of these gigantic and critical industries. We
believe both of these industries, which historically have been highly
resistant to entrepreneurial change, are primed for tipping by great new
software-centric entrepreneurs.

Even national defense is increasingly software-based. The modern combat
soldier is embedded in a web of software that provides intelligence,
communications, logistics and weapons guidance. Software-powered drones
launch airstrikes without putting human pilots at risk. Intelligence
agencies do large-scale data mining with software to uncover and track
potential terrorist plots.

Companies in every industry need to assume that a software revolution is
coming. This includes even industries that are software-based today. Great
incumbent software companies like Oracle and Microsoft are increasingly
threatened with irrelevance by new software offerings like Salesforce.com
and Android (especially in a world where Google owns a major handset maker).

In some industries, particularly those with a heavy real-world component
such as oil and gas, the software revolution is primarily an opportunity
for incumbents. But in many industries, new software ideas will result in
the rise of new Silicon Valley-style start-ups that invade existing
industries with impunity. Over the next 10 years, the battles between
incumbents and software-powered insurgents will be epic. Joseph Schumpeter,
the economist who coined the term "creative destruction," would be proud.

And while people watching the values of their 401(k)s bounce up and down
the last few weeks might doubt it, this is a profoundly positive story for
the American economy, in particular. It's not an accident that many of the
biggest recent technology companies—including Google, Amazon, eBay and
more—are American companies. Our combination of great research
universities, a pro-risk business culture, deep pools of innovation-seeking
equity capital and reliable business and contract law is unprecedented and
unparalleled in the world.

Still, we face several challenges.

First of all, every new company today is being built in the face of massive
economic headwinds, making the challenge far greater than it was in the
relatively benign '90s. The good news about building a company during times
like this is that the companies that do succeed are going to be extremely
strong and resilient. And when the economy finally stabilizes, look out—the
best of the new companies will grow even faster.

Secondly, many people in the U.S. and around the world lack the education
and skills required to participate in the great new companies coming out of
the software revolution. This is a tragedy since every company I work with
is absolutely starved for talent. Qualified software engineers, managers,
marketers and salespeople in Silicon Valley can rack up dozens of
high-paying, high-upside job offers any time they want, while national
unemployment and underemployment is sky high. This problem is even worse
than it looks because many workers in existing industries will be stranded
on the wrong side of software-based disruption and may never be able to
work in their fields again. There's no way through this problem other than
education, and we have a long way to go.

Finally, the new companies need to prove their worth. They need to build
strong cultures, delight their customers, establish their own competitive
advantages and, yes, justify their rising valuations. No one should expect
building a new high-growth, software-powered company in an established
industry to be easy. It's brutally difficult.

I'm privileged to work with some of the best of the new breed of software
companies, and I can tell you they're really good at what they do. If they
perform to my and others' expectations, they are going to be highly
valuable cornerstone companies in the global economy, eating markets far
larger than the technology industry has historically been able to pursue.

Instead of constantly questioning their valuations, let's seek to
understand how the new generation of technology companies are doing what
they do, what the broader consequences are for businesses and the economy
and what we can collectively do to expand the number of innovative new
software companies created in the U.S. and around the world.

That's the big opportunity. I know where I'm putting my money.

—Mr. Andreessen is co-founder and general partner of the venture capital
firm Andreessen-Horowitz. He also co-founded Netscape, one of the first
browser companies.



------------------------------
  [image: Avast logo] <http://www.avast.com/>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com



__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcGxsZHNmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0Mjk2NDQ4Njc->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcDB1ajU5BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyOTY0NDg2Nw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to