*Why Republicans Can’t Debate Obama*

Posted By *Daniel Greenfield* On April 22, 2015

[image: Description: obama-vs-gop]
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/obama-vs-gop.jpg>[1]The
Republican Party is a party that does not know what it stands for. It has a
voter base, but no identity, and it is facing an ideological war while
lacking an ideology to guide its counterattack.

Democrats and Republicans both form progressive parties. The GOP doesn’t
publicly embrace this identity, instead paying lip service to small
government and individualism, but Democrats have been hitting most of the
same notes ever since the backlash from the New Deal and the Great Society
went critical. Even Obama says many of the same things when he needs to.

Internally both parties embrace the progressive essentials of a large
centralized government that coordinates with major corporations and
non-profits to manage society, making the expert supreme over the
individual, the university over the village and the study over common sense
in an endless cycle of reform, not of government, but of social
institutions and human behavior.

The difference is that the Democrats are a progressive party with a
left-wing ideology and Republicans are a progressive party without the
left-wing ideology.

The political difference is significant, but the policy difference is
insignificant because the mechanisms of progressive governance, the
unionized bureaucrat, who defines what government does, and the expert
adviser, whose studies and committees define what government should be
doing, are mostly of the left, especially when the policies in question
relate to social issues.

Progressive governance is built around the university. Its form of
government embeds the prejudices and hobbyhorses of academia into the realm
of policy. The tilt of universities toward the left has made progressive
governance a vehicle for implementing left-wing ideology.

The Democratic and Republican parties are both in denial about the
implications of this reality. The Republicans just happen to be more in
denial about it because while there are few demographic differences between
party leaders, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren all used to
be Republicans, there are major cultural differences between the bases of
both parties.

The Democrats merged the elements of their old urban political machines
with the big reform agendas of the activists who fought against them. Their
party reconciles the big city political machines and muckrakers in one big
Socialist tent with corruption and totalitarianism for all.

The Republican base unites social conservatives, national defense hawks, a
post-immigrant urban and suburban middle class and rural farmers, into an
opposition to the pace of change, the loss of their way of life and the
power of government to interfere with their lives.

But they are wedded to a progressive party that disagrees with their
reasons for allying with it.

The Republican Party has failed to stop Obama because it is unable to
articulate what he has done wrong besides violating the processes and
procedures of government. Its establishment is unable to convincingly
debate him because they agree with his premises while challenging his
processes.

Amnesty is a typical example. A Republican leadership that supports amnesty
has denounced Obama’s amnesty not for its impact on Americans, but for its
procedural illegality. And Obama taunted them with the populist argument
that he was doing what they were too gridlocked to do.

By arguing process, Republicans become locked in to a defensive argument
about their authority while Obama postures as a populist cutting through
the red tape and “getting things done”. Americans agree on process, but are
unenthusiastic about it. Process doesn’t impact their lives. Policy does.
And Republicans can’t argue against policies that they substantively agree
with.

Republicans were unable to convincingly win the argument on everything from
government bailouts to Benghazi because they agreed with too many of the
policy premises that led to them. Instead of discussing the roots of the
financial crisis or the roots of the Libyan War, Republicans tried to
pounce on end stage corruption and dishonesty. That might have been an
effective tactic in a different media environment, but it’s hard to blow up
a scandal when the media is your enemy and you can’t credibly differentiate
yourself on the underlying issues.

Genuine populism requires root cause critiques. You can’t simply pounce on
local misbehavior, like the lies about Benghazi, while letting the real
problem, supporting Islamic terrorists, fall by the wayside. Populism
doesn’t limit itself to a situational scandal. It challenges the entire
system.

To challenge Obama and Hillary, Republicans have to stop clinging to the
same progressive premises. They have to be willing to take on the ideology
and the policy, not just the bad outcomes. Otherwise they’re no different
than the Democrats who supported the Iraq War, only to turn on it for
political advantage.

Republican politicians drip fed talking points by experts are unable to
mount big picture arguments. After talking to some of the right experts and
industry lobbyists, they can call for reform, but they don’t understand the
issue in any depth outside their talking points. Their proposals
progressively restructure government without dealing with the real problem.

That’s why you will hear them rattle off the same clunkers about pinning a
green card to every immigrant with a degree or how we need to talk more
about fighting radical Islam. What they can’t do is discuss whether there
actually is a shortage of American workers with degrees or what the actual
difference between radical Islam and Islam might be because these are areas
where they largely agree with the premises of their supposed opponents.

It’s hard to argue with a position whose premise you agree with. Once you
accept the premise, then the differences become cosmetic. They become ways
of signaling cultural differences, such as a free market orientation or
muscular rhetoric, without offering anything useful to voters, or
addressing the underlying problems with the policies that the other side is
pursuing.

Republican politicians excel at signaling opposition without producing it,
exhausting the patience of their base and the opposition. Unable to argue
policy, they instead debate process, allowing Obama to take the lead and do
what many of them want done anyway.

If the Republican Party is to deserve victory, it will have to differ from
the Democratic Party in more than the character of its stale rhetoric. It
will have to become a populist party that challenges the progressive policy
machine and rejects its displacement of individual rights, a party that
stands for the democracy of the individual, not the oligarchy of the social
collective.

We already have a progressive populist party. If the Republican Party wants
to be a populist party, rather than a grudging opposition of the sensible
big business progressives, its populism must reject the progressive state.
That will mean dramatically overturning a century’s worth of bad solutions,
standing up to central government and tearing out the bureaucracy by the
root.

The Republican Party will have to stop standing for systems and start
standing for people again.

*Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: **Click here*
<http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=david+horowitz&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&qid=1316459840&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&sort=daterank>
[2]*. *

*LIKE* <https://www.facebook.com/frontpagemag?fref=ts> [3]*
Frontpagemag.com on Facebook and **Subscribe*
<http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&id=c761755bdf>
[4]* to **Jamie Glazov Productions*
<http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&id=c761755bdf>
[4]*.*
------------------------------

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: *http://www.frontpagemag.com
<http://www.frontpagemag.com>*

URL to article:
*http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/why-republicans-cant-debate-obama/
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/why-republicans-cant-debate-obama/>*

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: 
*http://www.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/obama-vs-gop.jpg
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/obama-vs-gop.jpg>*

[2] *Click here*:
*http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=david+horowitz&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&qid=1316459840&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&sort=daterank
<http://www.amazon.com/s/ref%3dnb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=david+horowitz&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&ajr=0#/ref=sr_st?keywords=david+horowitz&qid=1316459840&rh=n:133140011%2ck:david+horowitz&sort=daterank>*

[3] *LIKE*: *https://www.facebook.com/frontpagemag?fref=ts
<https://www.facebook.com/frontpagemag?fref=ts>*

[4] *Subscribe*:
*http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&id=c761755bdf
<http://horowitzfreedomcenter.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=caa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d&id=c761755bdf>*




------------------------------
  [image: Avast logo] <http://www.avast.com/>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com



__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbW9tajUwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0Mjk3Mjc0Mzc->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbHVuanM2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyOTcyNzQzNw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to