20committee posted: "In the  two years since the Edward Snowden saga went 
public, a handful of  people who actually understand the Western signals 
intelligence system  have tried to explain the many ways that the Snowden 
Operation has  smeared NSA and its partners with salacious "      
             
New  post on The XX Committee 
              (http://20committee.com/author/20committee/)   
_Snowden  is a Fraud_ 
(http://20committee.com/2015/06/12/snowden-is-a-fraud/) 
by _20committee_ (http://20committee.com/author/20committee/)    
 
In  the two years since the Edward Snowden saga went  public, a handful of 
people who actually  understand the Western signals intelligence  system 
have tried to explain the many ways that  _the  Snowden Operation_ 
(http://20committee.com/2014/05/31/the-xx-committee-snowden-reader/)  has 
smeared NSA 
and its  partners with salacious charges of criminality  and abuse. I've been 
one of the public faces of  what may be called the Snowden Truth movement,  
and finally there are signs that reality may be  intruding on this debate. 
No  American ally was rocked harder by Snowden's  allegations than Germany, 
which has endured a  bout of _hysteria  _ 
(http://20committee.com/2013/10/27/nsa-germany-and-handygate-a-reality-check/) 
over charges that NSA was 
listening in on  senior German officials, including Chancellor  Angela Merkel. 
Although these stories included a  good deal of _bunkum  _ 
(http://20committee.com/2013/10/28/update-merkels-real-cellphone-is-secure/) 
from the start, 
they caused a firestorm in  Germany, particularly the alleged spying on  
Merkel, which was termed Handygate by the  media. 
In  response, Germany charged Federal prosecutors  with looking into the 
matter and, they if  determined there was sufficient evidence, to  press 
charges against NSA for breaking stringent  German privacy laws. The 
investigation, led by  Harald Range, Germany's attorney general, has  been slow 
and 
diligent, examining all possible  evidence about NSA spying on Germany. Here  
Snowden's purloined information would play a key  role. 
However,  the matter has become politically fraught. In  the first place, 
senior German security  officials were _circumspect_ 
(http://20committee.com/2014/07/29/german-counterintelligence-and-the-american-threat/)
   about the 
case, since Berlin is heavily  dependent on NSA for intelligence on vital  
matters like terrorism. Worse, follow-on Snowden  revelations showed that the 
BND, German's  foreign intelligence service, and NSA are close  partners, 
and the BND has itself been spying on  EU neighbor states that are friendly 
to Germany  such as _Austria_ (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32596510) 
,  _Belgium,  and the Netherlands_ 
(http://www.thelocal.de/20150530/belgium-netherlands-probe-german-spy-claims) . 
To  top it off, last month's major hack of the  Bundestag, Germany's 
parliament, turns out to  have been the work of _Russians_ 
(http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-accused-of-hacking-german-bundestag-2015-6)
 ,  apparently 
state-sponsored. In reality, the  major spy threats to Germany are not NSA, 
but  Russians and Chinese, as I've been saying for  some time -- and, to be 
fair, _so  have German security officials_ 
(http://20committee.com/2014/08/11/berlin-nsa-is-not-spying-on-german-industry/)
 , though they  got drowned out 
in the public hysteria over  Snowden. 
And  now we learn that Range's prosecutors are  dropping their year-long 
Handygate inquiry, for  want of hard evidence. Federal prosecutors in  
Karlsruhe aren't saying much, beyond that they  simply don't have evidence of 
spying that would  stand up in court. Back in December, Attorney  General Range 
offered a warning about the  dubious nature of much of the "evidence" against 
 NSA: 
The document presented in public  as proof of an actual tapping of the 
mobile  phone is not an authentic surveillance order by  the NSA. It does not 
come from the NSA database.  There is no proof at the moment which could lead  
to charges that Chancellor Merkel's phone  connection data was collected or 
her calls  tapped. 
Got  that? That's the polite, legalistic way of  saying the Snowden claims 
are backed by faked  NSA documents, as has been clear for some time  to 
anybody who understands counterintelligence  and the SIGINT system. This should 
surprise no  one, since using fake or doctored Western  intelligence 
documents to embarrass democracies  is_  a venerable tradition for Russian  
intelligence_ 
(http://20committee.com/2014/10/01/diamonds-and-disinformation-are-forever/)  
-- the proper espionage term is  _Active  Measures_ 
(http://20committee.com/2014/07/08/active-measures-havana-style/)  -- and since 
Snowden's 
been in  Moscow for the last two years and shows no signs  of going anywhere 
else anytime soon, two and two  can be added together here. 
To  make matters worse for Snowden's fans, a _report  _ 
(http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/abgehoertes-merkel-handy-generalbundesanwalt-stellt-e
rmittlungen-ein-a-1038458.html) about the Handygate inquiry being dropped 
in  the magazine Der Spiegel, which has  been a key player in the Snowden 
Operation,  includes the painful truth. While some have  clamored to get 
Snowden out of Moscow to testify  before prosecutors, Berlin understood how  
politically tricky that would be. Moreover,  prosecutors determined that Ed 
simply didn't  have much to say. 
As  a prosecutor explained, Snowden  provided "no evidence that he has  his 
own knowledge" (keine Hinweise  dafür, dass er über eigene Kenntnisse  
verfügt). In other words, Ed doesn't  actually know what he's talking about. 
This is  not news to anybody who understands how NSA and  the Allied SIGINT 
system actually  work. 
Snowden  was an IT guy, not a SIGINT analyst, and in his  final position he 
was working as a contracted  infrastructure analyst for NSA's Information  
Assurance arm, i.e. the Agency's defensive side,  which protects classified 
U.S. communications  networks. Snowden was never a SIGINTer, working  on the 
intelligence collection side of the  house, and he doesn't seem to 
understand how  that complex system, built over decades,  actually functions. 
This  is why Snowden has made so many odd,  contradictory, and even 
outlandish statements  over the past couple years about SIGINT, which  have 
caused 
those who actually understand how  NSA works scratch their heads ... Ed 
doesn't  know any better. 
It's  been obvious for some time to insiders that, for  reasons we still 
don't fully understand, Snowden  decided to steal something like 1.7 million  
classified documents from NSA servers through  internal hacks. About 
_900,000_ 
(https://news.vice.com/article/exclusive-inside-washingtons-quest-to-bring-down-edward-snowden)
   of those documents came from the Pentagon and  have 
nothing to do with intelligence  matters. 
There's  no way Snowden could have read more than a tiny  fraction of what 
he stole, nobody has that much  time, and it's clear now that Ed, an IT guy 
and  a thief, who was never any sort of "spy" as he  portrays himself, would 
not have understood all  those NSA documents he made off with anyway. 
Snowden's  been living under the protection of Putin's  Federal Security 
Service now for two years,  functioning as a pawn of Russian intelligence.  
When his secret relationship with the Kremlin  started remains _an  open 
question_ 
(http://20committee.com/2014/05/31/when-did-snowden-go-over-to-the-russians/) , 
but that he has one now can  only be denied by the foolish (witness 
the _weak  lies_ 
(http://20committee.com/2015/01/12/snowden-and-russian-intelligence-an-update/) 
 told by his supporters about Ed's FSB  ties), since 
when you defect, you wind up in the  care of that country's security service. 
That's  how it works in America, and I don't hear  anybody seriously 
suggesting that Putin's  Kremlin is more liberal in these matters than  the FBI 
or 
CIA. 
In  light of these revelations from Germany, it's  worth pondering whether 
Ed was always just a  pawn, a talking head, for others with agendas to  harm 
Western security. As we're now in the_  Cold War 2.0_ 
(http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/03/new-cold-war-russia-104954.html#.VXrQsUbyvYA)
  
with Russia that I warned you  about after Putin's theft of Crimea, this seems 
 like a more than academic question. 
For  two years now, I've been trying to inform the  public about what's 
really going on behind the  Snowden Operation, using my understanding of how  
the _SpyWar_ 
(http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/snowden-the-us-russian-spywar-8668)   
actually functions, and I've gotten a lot of  grief for it 
from Ed's hardcore fans. News out  of Germany can't help my point out that, 
well  ... _I  told you so_ (http://20committee.com/2015/05/28/i-told-you-so/) . 


_20committee_ (http://20committee.com/author/20committee/)   | June 12, 
2015 at 08:38 | Categories: _Counterintelligence_ 
(http://20committee.com/?cat=1354826) ,  _Espionage_ 
(http://20committee.com/?cat=88698) ,  _USG_ 
(http://20committee.com/?cat=1126077)   | URL: http://wp.me/p2zHUk-Dx  
_Unsubscribe_ 
(https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=bb0ebee032395803a4567d7f66c9ed1c&[email protected]&b=0ad-je~~TisaLRWWW8_BLW_j?RvaejPbFG,]EPJ?em|
M+-6gE6)   to no longer receive posts from The XX  Committee.
Change your email settings at _Manage  Subscriptions_ 
(https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=bb0ebee032395803a4567d7f66c9ed1c&[email protected])
 .  
Trouble  clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your  browser: 
http://20committee.com/2015/06/12/snowden-is-a-fraud/     
_Thanks for flying with  WordPress.com_ (http://wordpress.com/)   



-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to