​

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 10:17 AM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> *"In 1776, few imagined or looked to a future of central banks, massive
> national standing armies, or a federal legal system that regulated the
> daily lives of Americans down to the most minute details. In fact, had the
> typical Revolutionary War soldier been told that such a future awaited his
> country, he would have likely gone home immediately, as such a future would
> likely appear even worse to him than staying subject to the British Crown’s
> benign neglect." *July 4, 2015
>
> *Five Laws to Repeal on Independence Day *Ryan McMaken
>
> Unfortunately, Independence Day has become a day for many to celebrate the
> United States government. The actual historical event behind the day,
> however ­ the adoption of the Declaration of Independence ­ was an illegal
> act of political defiance that led to secession and the overthrow of an
> entire system of mercantilist government in North America.
>
> Moreover, it is quite anachronistic to connect the modern unified
> nation-state known as “the United States” to this event, nor does it make
> sense to invoke anything having to do with the Constitution of 1787.
>
> Indeed, as Jeffrey Rogers Hummel has pointed out
> <http://www.la-articles.org.uk/FL-5-4-3.pdf>, the Constitution we now
> labor under represents a counter-revolution against the Spirit of 1776. The
> Spirit of *1787*, in contrast, was about taking what the Declaration of
> Independence repeatedly refers to in the plural as “free and independent
> states” and hammering them into one unified state.
>
> Fortunately, the Federalists ­ the now benighted and so-called “founding
> fathers” ­ partially failed and were beaten back by the anti-Federalists
> who demanded a Bill of Rights ­ the only *laissez-faire* portion of the
> Constitution ­ which temporarily crippled the centralizing efforts of the
> Federalists.
>
> But just as the Constitution itself is contrary to what is celebrated on
> Independence Day, we can also look to several Acts of Congress since 1787
> that have perhaps done some of the most damage in undoing what the
> revolutionaries had intended.
>
>
>
> *The Judiciary Act of 1789 *Unknown to many, the entire federal court
> system outside the Supreme Court stems from this one law adopted during the
> first session of Congress. At the time, there was fierce opposition from
> many in the United States who recognized that a federal system of courts
> would allow for the extension of federal law into the allegedly independent
> states themselves. The act created the office of the Attorney General and
> the appellate system of courts which today allows the Supreme Court to
> exercise appellate jurisdiction over pretty much every aspect of life
> inside the United States. Without these courts, the Supreme Court would be
> limited to its few areas of original jurisdiction. Thus, without the
> federal court system, there would be no courts through which to regulate
> things such as drug prohibition, marriage, abortion, wages, and the whole
> panoply of the modern federal regulatory state.
>
>
>
> *The Louisiana Purchase Treaty *Thomas Jefferson announced the signing of
> the Louisiana Purchase Treaty on July 4, 1803. Jefferson considered the
> Purchase to be a great victory for his un-ironically named “ Empire of
> Liberty
> <https://www.lewrockwell.com/2006/11/ryan-mcmaken/the-unfortunate-history-of-american-nationalism/>”
> scheme in which the United States would spread “liberty” by force across
> North America.
>
> The Louisiana Purchase would have far reaching effects on the entire
> nature of the American confederation and on constitutional law. Direct
> Congressional control over lands in the west had always been a dream of
> nationalists and centralizers, and the Louisiana Purchase gave the US
> government access to vast new resources beyond the control of any state.
> Defense of these federal lands necessitated an expansion of a federal
> military force, and required a much larger apparatus of federal law to
> administer the lands.
>
> Moreover, these new federal lands created the impression for many that the
> states were created out of federal lands, instead of federal powers being
> granted to the central government by states. The later claim by
> anti-secessionists that the federal government created the states, and not
> vice versa, owes much to the Louisiana Purchase, and to this day, the
> federal government directly controls and owns over 50 percent of the land
> in most Western states.
>
>
>
> *The Militia Act of 1903 *Prior to the adoption of the Militia Act, the
> law was ambiguous about how the federal government could seize control of
> state militias for use in the federal government’s wars. Some states
> resisted use of their troops in the invasion of Canada during the War of
> 1812, for example, and federal politicians faced the onerous task of
> convincing state governments to offer up state militias for national
> military service.
>
> Political realities meant that state governments were often more than
> happy to oblige of course, but there nevertheless remained the risk that
> the states could offer real and meaningful resistance to unpopular wars by
> withholding military support. Naturally, this was very inconvenient for the
> federal government, so in the name of repelling foreign bogeymen and
> enhancing “efficiency,” the armed forces of the United States were unified,
> allowing presidents to seize control of state militias whenever they liked.
> Today, the militias have been replaced by the adjuncts of the federal
> military known as the “National Guard.”
>
>
>
> *The Revenue Act of 1913 *In 1913, the US Constitution was amended to
> allow Congress to levy personal income taxes. The amendment does not
> mandate an income tax, however, so later that year, Congress passed
> enabling legislation creating the income tax we know today. Since then,
> federal budgets have ballooned, tax burdens have swelled, and it is now
> simply accepted that the federal government should be able to examine every
> aspect of your financial life to make sure you’re paying “what you owe.”
> Financial privacy is now only a distant memory.
>
>
>
> *The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 *While the United States had had central
> banks before, the Federal Reserve, created in 1913, is by far the most
> enduring and most powerful. Over the years, the Fed has become a behemoth
> that does everything from regulating the financial system to monetizing the
> debt to creating never-ending liquidity for its friends on Wall Street who
> ­ thanks to the Fed ­ never have to face the consequences of their bad
> investment decisions. In other words, the Fed is a mercantilist’s and crony
> capitalist’s dream institution, allowing the wealthy and powerful to
> constantly and silently extract wealth from the powerless many who hold US
> dollars and are subject to the whims of the too-big-to-fail financial
> system.
>
>
>
> *What Are We Celebrating? *In 1776, few imagined or looked to a future of
> central banks, massive national standing armies, or a federal legal system
> that regulated the daily lives of Americans down to the most minute
> details. In fact, had the typical Revolutionary War soldier been told that
> such a future awaited his country, he would have likely gone home
> immediately, as such a future would likely appear even worse to him than
> staying subject to the British Crown’s benign neglect.
>
> Yet, in spite of all of this, nothing can change the fact that America’s
> national holiday is founded on an act of treason and secession, and that
> the Declaration of Independence was born out of a generation of smugglers
> and “criminals” who refused to take orders from a far-more-powerful and
> well-armed government. It’s a reality that may yet prove inconvenient for
> our government and many others in the future.
>
>
>  https://mises.org/library/five-laws-repeal-independence-day
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to