Not only that, but apparently a LOT of our fellow Americans think we should *gasp* LEAVE the U.N. Even going so far as to say we never should have joined it. Can you imagine!
By Jim Kouri for National Law Enforcement Examiner, at www.examiner.com/article/lawmaker-blasts-obama-administration-s-signing-of-u-n-gun-control-law --J. Lawmaker blasts Obama administration's signing of U.N. gun control law October 14, 2013 2:49 PM MST The U.N. General Assembly overwhelmingly approved the first international treaty regulating the multibillion-dollar global arms trade Tuesday, capping a more than decade-long campaign to keep weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists,... on.aol.com In a letter he released in the middle of the government shutdown controversy on Thursday, http://www.moran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/second-amendment1, R-Kan., reminded Americans of a U.N. power grab when he blasted the Obama administration's signing of the United Nations <http://www.examiner.com/topic/united-nations> Arms Trade Treaty <http://www.examiner.com/topic/arms-trade-treaty> (ATT), according to gun rights expert John Snyder, who serves on the advisory board of the National Association of Chiefs of Police <http://www.nacoponline.org>. [image: The United Nations building in New York City is known by many as the Beast on the East River.] UNHRC Sen. Moran's letter <http://www.gunowners.org/president.htm> addressed President Barack Obama directly and he is inviting other members of the U.S. Senate to join him in his fight against global gun control as co-signers to his letter, Snyder noted. Sen. Moran noted in his biting letter: *"The treaty was adopted by a procedure which violates a red line laid down by your own administration. In October 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the U.S. supported the negotiations of the treaty only by 'the rule of consensus decision-making.' But in April 2013, after the treaty failed to achieve consensus, it was adopted by majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly. We fear that this capitulation has done great damage to the diplomatic credibility of the United States." * The Moran letter outlines four more reasons for condemning the Obama administration's signing of the ATT and urges the president *"to notify the treaty depository that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is therefore not bound by its obligations. As members of the Senate, we pledge to oppose the ratification of this treaty <http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/15820-house-votes-unanimously-to-ban-funding-for-un-gun-grab>, and we give notice that we do not regard the U.S. as bound to uphold its object and purpose." * But Snyder <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRW_3LiyMdM&feature=player_embedded>goes even further in his criticism. "... the underlying problem really is United States membership in the United Nations itself," he said. Snyder <http://www.GunRightsPolicies.org> noted that since the UN ATT was signed by Secretary of State John Kerry, it could be ratified at any time by a future Senate. "It's an ongoing, continuing threat to Americans' gun rights. To have hope of obviating this threat, we should work to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US," said Snyder, a former editor for Shotgun News and National Rifle Association publications. . Snyder also said, "The National Rifle Association was right on in blasting the Obama administration for signing the UN Arms Trade Treaty, as Secretary of State John Kerry <http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/un-treaties/324479-kerry-signs-arms-trade-treaty-opposed-by-senate-and-nra> recently did. The real problem, though, the underlying problem, is American membership in the United Nations." "This has been the opinion of many Americans since the founding of the UN. This act by the Obama administration underscores part of the explanation for this reasoning. It shows why we should dump the United Nations organization," Snyder said. "ATT undermines our national sovereignty and individual gun rights. The treaty refers specifically to small arms. This means the 300 million rifles, shotguns and handguns owned by 100 million Americans," Snyder argues. "Gun-grabbing interests <http://www.examiner.com/article/new-york-s-mayor-sued-for-documents-regarding-gun-control-activities> for years have been pushing for ways to undermine the individual Second Amendment civil right of law-abiding American citizens to keep and bear arms. They generally have butted their heads against the brick wall of domestic American opposition to various anti-gun legislative schemes. They even have seen Americans strengthen public policy in support of some pro-gun measures, like the right to carry concealed firearms and so-called 'stand your ground laws,'" he said. "Obama most likely cannot induce the Senate to ratify ATT <http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/38742>. More than a sufficient number of Senators to defeat ratification are on record opposing ratification. However, anti-gun forces may think they can promote additional domestic gun controls because of some legal interpretations that activity commensurate with the objective of a treaty may and should be pursued pending ratification," Snyder predicts. Snyder warned that, "An Obama attempt to implement the treaty will draw down upon his administration the active opposition of millions of Americans." Sen. Bob Corker <http://www.corker.senate.gov/>, R-Tenn., the Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated, "The ATT raises significant legislative and constitutional questions <http://www.orangepower.com/threads/un-arms-treaty.174559/>. Any act to implement this treaty, provisionally or otherwise, before the Congress provides its advice and consent would be inconsistent with the United States Constitution, law, and practice." Snyder adds, "The real problem is United States membership in the United Nations organization." __._,_.___ ------------------------------ Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> ------------------------------ Visit Your Group <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdm9wcGt1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MzYxOTIxNjQ-> [image: Yahoo! Groups] <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNmp2NDJqBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQzNjE5MjE2NA--> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> __,_._,___ -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
