Of course, patriotic, peace-loving, secular Muslims are an oxymoron.
Muslims do not have the luxury of cherry-picking which parts of the Koran
to support and follow.  In Islam it is all or nothing.  After all, it is
Allah’s literal word we’re talking about ignoring…doing so make the
“secular Muslim” an apostate, i.e. not a Muslim at all.



B




Candy Crush, Highway Safety and Islam <http://www.citizenwarrior.com/>

[image: Link to Citizen Warrior] <http://www.citizenwarrior.com/>
------------------------------

Posted: 25 Sep 2015 04:40 PM PDT

<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RrBWsAR9rZs/VgXV6ZDao6I/AAAAAAAAFRc/GlqSRc7Y5bc/s1600/candy-crush-islam.png>*The
following was written by Chase Beckett
<http://jurisprudenceinquiry.blogspot.com/2015/09/candy-crush-highway-safety-and-islam.html>:*

My wife craves enjoys playing the computer game *Candy Crush*
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candy_Crush_Saga>. The game designers
repeatedly thwart her achieving a “higher level” and add insult to injury
by building a mandatory 20-minute “wait” period before she continues her
“quest” to achieve “Candy Queendom.” I was envious the game had more
control than I did. I wondered if there was an app I could install on her
phone for the purposes of a 20-minute timeout that would apply to dealing
with me but so far no such app exists.

Stay with me, I’m getting to the connection with Islam.

After several months I noticed that the “mandatory” breaks were occurring
less often and assumed she was finally achieving Candy Crush Paradise. When
I inquired she proudly said, “Nope, I just move the date/time on my iPad
settings up; I fool the game and play on as if nothing is wrong.”

Wow! I was very proud of my non-IT spouse jury-rigging her iPad to
accomplish her end goal. I asked what I thought would be innocuous
question, “Do you think by changing the date on the iPad you are cheating?”
She replied in a superior manner, “Of course not, don’t be silly. I’m not
going to let a game-manufacturer determine when I wish to play this
game...are you serious?” Actually, yes and no.

Continuing my shallow defense of Candy Crush I told her that when she
downloaded the game she agreed to the standard “terms and conditions”
agreement. Didn’t she feel obligated to abide by these rules? I was
immediately given the “stink-eye’ every husband fears, fully understanding
any further cross-examination would result in some other form of “candy
crush” and it wouldn’t be on a computer.

While most US peace-loving, patriotic Muslims are respectful toward
non-Muslims, the reality is a significant number voice violent sentiments
and see nothing wrong for the enforcement of Shariah law over US law (*here*
<https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/>
 and *here* <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7TAAw3oQvg> for US Muslims,
worldwide surveys *here*
<http://pamelageller.com/2015/03/pew-poll-analysis-a-billion-muslims-want-sharia-law.html/>….1+
billion). While the majority of respondents were peaceful in the US survey
(not the case worldwide), *the peaceful Muslim is irrelevant*
<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2010/10/why-peaceful-majority-is-irrelevant.html>,
just as the “safe driver” on the road is irrelevant to me when I’m driving.

It is the drunk driver, the distracted driver, the sleep deprived driver
that is relevant. They threaten my life or those of my family. *Criticism
of the drunk driver or the texting soccer mom is never countered with “most
drivers are safe and aren’t a threat” argument. *Yet with Islamic violence
against Muslims and non-Muslims this is the standard argument. Passage of
laws against drunk driving or banning cell phone usage is acceptable yet
the weapon of political correctness is used to thwart the mere mention of
lawful and reasonable actions against those elements of Islam that threaten
non-Muslims and other law-abiding Muslims.

A patriotic, friendly, secular Muslim may abide by society’s “terms and
conditions” but at a time of their choosing using the logic of
Islam/Muhammad’s laws of *abrogation*
<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/09/definition-of-abrogation.html> and
*taqiyya*
<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/taqiyya-religious-deception.html>, a
“peace-loving” Muslim may “reset the game,” ignore the “terms and
conditions” of Western values and apply *Shariah law*
<http://www.inquiryintoislam.com/2015/02/sharia-law.html>. This Islamic
lens of the “ends justifies the means” is incomprehensible to Western
leaders who fail to understand *Islam’s basic tenets*
<http://www.inquiryintoislam.com/2010/07/why-is-islam-so-successful.html>.

No wonder the acts of a formerly peaceful Muslim who suddenly commits
horrific acts of violence while shouting “*Allah Akbar*
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/01/the-real-meaning-of-allahu-akbar>” is
written off as being “radicalized.” The underpinnings of political Islam
which fully justify the violent actions are left unsaid and substituted
with politically correct terms like "lone wolf," "extreme Islam," or
"violent extremism."

Being able to reset the rules, laws and acceptable behavior (under Shariah)
is a game changer (no pun intended). Why do more Muslims not speak out
about this? The price is too high and besides, why attempt to explain away
violent behavior as being non-Islamic when there are enough non-Muslim
apologists who do it for them?

Getting behind the wheel and determining which of the drivers on the road
is unfit to drive parallels the dilemma non-Muslims and even Muslims face
when determining which Muslim is likely to be the next terrorist. Who can
tell when a peaceful Muslim will “reset their clock” and decide to follow *the
path Muhammad did while in Medina*
<http://www.inquiryintoislam.com/2015/06/muhammad-and-genocide-of-jews.html>?
Fortunately the majority don’t follow that path but *how many of us will
turn off our car’s airbags or not fasten their seatbelt because there are
no threats on the next trip? *

When our political and military leaders show the courage to speak honestly
about *the root causes of Islamic terrorism*
<http://www.inquiryintoislam.com/2015/06/the-founder-of-islams-crimes-against.html>,
true peace-loving Muslims and non-Muslims will find hope for the future and
a way out of the violence attributed to *political Islam*
<http://www.politicalislam.com/about/>.

*The above was also posted on Inquiry Into Islam here
<http://www.inquiryintoislam.com/2015/09/candy-crush-highway-safety-and-islam.html>.*





Email delivery powered by Google






__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNTR1ZnFpBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NDMyNzMyNzA->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaTRlaW5rBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ0MzI3MzI3MA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to