chief executive last week vetoed the new Defense Authorization Act. That enactment pays the salaries of our troops and buys the bullets, beans and black oil they use to fight ISIS and al Qaeda --- great news! ISIS and AQ are being killed by other muzzies and russians ... no US intervention needed.
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 1:49:07 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/when-you-cant-fix-stupid?f=must_reads > > > When you can’t fix stupid > > by COLONEL KENNETH ALLARD (US ARMY, RET.) > <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/detail/colonel-kenneth-allard-us-army-ret> > > October 28, 2015 > > [image: Description: > http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20131004_obama_stunned_stupid_eyesclosed_LARGEjpg.jpg] > > Proving he has learned nothing, our chief executive last week vetoed the > new Defense Authorization Act. That enactment pays the salaries of our > troops and buys the bullets, beans and black oil they use to fight ISIS and > al Qaeda. Unschooled and unskilled in defense matters, President Obama is a > Grimm fairy tale of what happens when a community organizer in chief is > horribly miscast as the commander in chief. > > For one thing, Mr. Obama is not the sort of leader who plays nicely with > others, like the bipartisan House and Senate majorities that passed the > legislation. His lack of strategic vision is highlighted by the bill he > just vetoed, which provides precisely the same $621 billion he originally > requested. At just over 3 percent of gross domestic product, that is the > lowest percentage of defense spending since the end of the Cold War, which > - as you may have heard - is back again. If Mr. Obama considers it prudent > to spend only three cents out of every dollar on our defenses, is he really > fit to command at all? For that matter, if his budgetary judgments are left > unchallenged by "we the people," then does this nation really deserve the > freedom we customarily take for granted? > > It is far from clear whether we can even survive the remaining 15 months > of an administration that ignores our increasingly outgunned and at-risk > military establishment in favor of yet more social spending. As Sen. John > McCain and Rep. Mac Thornberry recently pointed out in The Wall Street > Journal, the real issue is about more butter and even fewer guns: "The > president is holding the military hostage to increase funding for > Washington bureaucracies like the Environmental Protection Agency and the > Internal Revenue Service." They also argue that fiscal impasse has become > an entrenched part of the American political culture, with sequestration > cutting "$1 trillion over ten years with no military rationale whatsoever." > > This is wretched public policy, of course, even during the best of times, > but flat-out suicidal with our foreign policy collapsing and our enemies on > the march. > > If your name happens to be Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Ali Khamenei or Kim > Jong-un, what new judgments might you reach when debating whether to > confront the once-vaunted American defense establishment? Would you still > stand in awe of the traditional global superpower or would you, to adopt > Chinese strategic parlance, discount American power as "a declining > hegemon," a paper tiger whose limelight has come and gone? > > Would you be deterred by our high-tech weaponry or write it off as > hopelessly hamstrung and hidebound against swarms of fanatical, elusive, > low-tech challengers? Why not simply fix bayonets and press forward, > persuaded by the inevitable hotheads that "we can take these guys"? When > fiscal incompetence hardens into tradition, the only remaining questions > are whether our defenses burn down or crumble at the first determined > challenge. > > Recent history contains abundant warnings about what can happen next, > especially when ordinary decisions suddenly have life-or-death > consequences. Egypt had been our strategic partner since the 1970s, when > Henry Kissinger made nice with Anwar Sadat, adroitly snatched them out of > the Soviet orbit and ushered in 40 years of peace between Egypt and Israel. > But Barack Obama had barely taken office when he changed all that, > embracing the Arab Spring and eventually backing the election of Muslim > Brotherhood leader Mohammed Morsi. By 2013, Mr. Morsi's regime had > deteriorated into an Islamist dictatorship. > > I was in Cairo shortly after 30 million Egyptians took to the streets and > sparked a military overthrow of Mr. Morsi's government. Over and over, > ordinary Egyptians asked me, "What has happened to our friendship with the > United States when Barack Obama occupies the Oval Office and supports our > Muslim Brotherhood enemies? Doesn't he know that these people are > terrorists and your enemies too?" Naturally, the Obama White House took > offense and, for a time, suspended all U.S. military aid. Today Egypt's > newfound friend and closest ally is Vladimir Putin. Having built the > pyramids, the Egyptians are the first to understand that you can't fix > stupid. > > The only thing you can do with stupid is change it, along with the > seductive mindset that you can avoid its life-changing consequences. If you > doubt that, then check out "I Remember Mama," George Stevens' classic movie > of a poor Norwegian immigrant family. It celebrates what were once > considered basic American values: love of family, hard work, respect and > frugality. So why did Stevens produce his Oscar-winning film in 1948, when > Americans were just beginning their postwar recovery? Maybe because he > realized that Mama and her family values had forged the character of the > Greatest Generation - and victory in World War II. > > > > Read more: Family Security Matters > <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/when-you-cant-fix-stupid?f=must_reads#ixzz3psPJlQ68> > > http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/when-you-cant-fix-stupid?f=must_reads#ixzz3psPJlQ68 > > Under Creative Commons License: Attribution > <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0> > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNGJqM3FmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NDYwNDY3MDI-> > > > - New Members > > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnOHY0Zmo3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDQ2MDQ2NzAy> > > 1 > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJldG5mMzkxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ0NjA0NjcwMg--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
