On Veterans Day, Who Should Thank Whom?
---
we should thank those who served America ... not those who created a career 
to serve other nations.

On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 6:12:11 PM UTC-6, MJ wrote:
>
>
> November 11, 2015
>
> *On Veterans Day, Who Should Thank Whom? *Dan Sanchez
>
> *(ANTIMEDIA <http://theantimedia.org/>)* “*You weep for Santiago, and you 
> curse the Marines. You have that luxury. (…) You don’t want the truth 
> because deep down in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want me on 
> that wall, you need me on that wall. (…) I have neither the time nor the 
> inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the 
> blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner 
> in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on 
> your way…*” 
>
> - Jack Nicholson as Col. Nathan R. Jessup in 
>
> *A Few Good Men *Anti-war activists are sometimes scolded that they owe 
> their freedom to speak out against war to the very soldiers they are 
> implicitly or explicitly criticizing. This is meant to silence opposition 
> to war by making it appear self-contradictory.
>
> However, for a very long time, American wars have only been foreign wars. 
> None of these wars (especially not the most recent ones) have been in 
> defense against foreign conquest of our homeland. Rather, the wars were 
> themselves invasions and conquests of the homelands of others.
>
> Moreover, the wars have not diminished, but multiplied 
> <http://www.dansanchez.me/feed/flytrap-to-breeding-ground> our foreign 
> enemies. They have toppled non-threats 
> <http://www.dansanchez.me/feed/seize-the-chaos>, like Iraq’s Saddam 
> Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, and created new actual threats, like 
> Al Qaeda in Iraq, which evolved into ISIS and Syrian Al Qaeda. Amid the 
> chaos that U.S. wars have created, such groups have thrived and grown 
> explosively <http://www.dansanchez.me/feed/flytrap-to-breeding-ground>.
>
> Yet even so, the chief threat to our freedoms is our own government, not 
> any foreign foe. And if anything, the activity of soldiers has contributed 
> to, not defended against, that threat.
>
> Randolph Bourne famously wrote, “War is the health of the State.” By that 
> he meant that foreign wars nourish domestic tyranny because they place 
> people into a siege mentality 
> <http://www.dansanchez.me/feed/the-herd-mind> that makes them more apt to 
> give up their freedoms for the sake of the war effort. And indeed, the 
> American national security state, from militarized cops to domestic spying, 
> has metastasized under the cover of the War on Terror.
>
> So, no, the activity of U.S. soldiers has not secured our freedoms, but 
> eroded them. More specifically, contrary to the common argument discussed 
> above, the troops are not busy protecting freedom of speech for all 
> Americans, including those who are anti-war. Rather, by contributing to 
> foreign wars, they make it more likely that someday the country’s siege 
> mentality will get so bad that speech (especially anti-war speech) will be 
> restricted.
>
> Since foreign wars are inimical to domestic freedom, it is those who 
> strenuously oppose war who are actually fighting for freedom. If not for 
> opponents and skeptics of war, we would have even more war than we do. And 
> in that case, individual freedoms would have been even more infringed upon.
>
> This is especially true for soldiers. If we were even more mired in war, 
> soldiers would have longer and more frequent tours of duty and be more 
> likely to be conscripted in a backdoor draft. They would also be more 
> likely to face combat, and thus more likely to be traumatized, maimed, or 
> killed.
>
> It is anti-war, not pro-war civilians who truly support the troops. And it 
> is anti-war activists who strive to secure the freedoms (and lives) of 
> imperial troopers, not the other way around.
>
> On Veterans Day, thank veterans of the anti-war movement for their 
> service, especially if you made the mistake (perhaps with the best 
> intentions) of enlisting in the war machine. But don’t bother thanking them 
> with words. The best way to thank them is by joining them in the struggle 
> for peace. Then a year from today, from the bottom of our hearts, we can 
> all thank you.
>
> http://theantimedia.org/on-veterans-day-who-should-thank-who/ 
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to