November 12, 2015

*How America Failed to Keep the Republic*

By Mark J. Fitzgibbons
<http://www.americanthinker.com/author/mark_j_fitzgibbons/>

The story, whether true or not, is that after the Constitution was adopted
in closed proceedings at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Ben Franklin
was asked on the street what form of government was created. He replied, “A
republic -- if you can keep it.”

Through the creation of the “Administrative State,” with vast bureaucracies
violating the separation of powers in ways unaccountable to the people and
the Constitution itself, America has failed to keep the republican form of
government created by the Founders.

Former Reagan administration lawyer Charles Cooper has penned a must-read
essay, “Confronting the Administrative State
<http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/confronting-the-administrative-state>,”
which in terms of brilliance in describing the root causes plaguing
America’s governance, ranks with Angelo Codevilla’s “America’s Ruling Class
— And the Perils of Revolution
<http://spectator.org/articles/39326/americas-ruling-class-and-perils-revolution>
.”

Cooper’s essay describes how America has failed to keep the republic
because the constitutional structure created by Franklin and his fellow
Founders is no longer the law of the land. The Administrative State “has
become a sovereign power unto itself, an *imperium in imperio* regulating
virtually every dimension of our lives. Its nearly 450 agencies are manned
by legions of bureaucrats, now numbering almost 2.7 million,” writes Cooper.

Unlike the frequent violations of the Constitution through legislation or
executive orders that may be reversed by future Congresses or presidents,
the Administrative State has become an institutionalized violation of the
constitutional structure itself.

Instead of the representative branch of government making laws, a separate
executive branch enforcing laws, and a neutral judiciary adjudicating
disputes -- and enforcing the rule of law on government itself -- the
republican structure of government has been displaced by the Administrative
State.  No longer are the powers of government separate.

Congress has delegated lawmaking functions to bureaucrats; bureaucrats have
usurped the power to adjudicate disputes; and courts now defer to
bureaucrats in interpreting the law. This is exactly contrary to the
purposes of the Constitution, and has been a “fundamental transformation”
of American government starting decades before Barack Obama ever uttered
the words.

Citing Federalist Papers such as James Madison’s No. 51
<http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa51.htm>, Cooper explains how the
separation of powers was designed to create conflict among the branches of
government, which was “admitted on all hands to be essential to the
preservation of liberty.” Instead of “ambition . . . [being] made to
counteract ambition,” the Administrative State grew under a ‘you scratch my
back, I’ll scratch yours’ approach among the three branches of government.

The principal villains in the destruction of the republic are not the
electorate or those whom they elected, although elected officials clearly
share the blame. It has been the courts, which time after time since the
1930s refused to be the bulwark for liberty by preserving the separation of
powers. The courts have dismantled the constitutional structure by yielding
powers to the Administrative State in ways not authorized by the
Constitution. By conceding to the accretions of power within the
Administrative State, the courts have institutionalized violations of the
Constitution, and replaced its carefully planned structure with the
Leviathan.

The other villain is Woodrow Wilson and his progressive roadmap of
transplanting the Constitution by giving government officials “large powers
and unhampered discretion.”

The lonely hero in Cooper’s essay, who seems to be holding his finger in
the dike against total transformation away from a constitutional republic,
is Justice Clarence Thomas. In the past term at the Supreme Court:

…four opinions authored by Justice Clarence Thomas…call into question the
constitutionality of the massive and largely unaccountable bureaucracy that
we commonly refer to as the administrative state. In bold and clear prose,
Justice Thomas explained how the basic principles of our Constitution's
separation of powers are incompatible with the system of bureaucratic rule
that took root in the Progressive era and now reaches into virtually every
realm of American life.

Cooper notes Justice Thomas’ reliance on the brilliant scholarship of
Philip Hamburger, whose book *Is Administrative Law Unlawful?*
<http://www.amazon.com/Administrative-Law-Unlawful-Philip-Hamburger/dp/022611659X>
has exposed the flawed, even unlawful, bases of the current Administrative
State.

I would add two thoughts to Cooper’s brilliant analysis.

The power given to administrative agencies to issue their own warrants for
papers, emails and other private property without probable cause or oath
and affirmation before neutral judges has created a police-state effect.
“Administrative subpoenas” are judge-less warrants. They are not only
institutionalized violations of the Fourth Amendment, but are used as
blunt-force instruments to create policy and silence critics of government
through extortive concessions by their targets.

Secondly, the destruction of our republican structure of government at the
federal level has trickled down into the states, which to varying degrees
have adopted the Administrative State methods of the federal government.
States themselves have a constitutional obligation under Article IV,
section 4 to follow a republican form of government, yet many states have
transplanted administrative discretion for the constitutional rule of law.

Opponents of a constitutional convention will find fault with Cooper’s
recommendation for one, but that proposed solution should not distract from
anyone’s appreciation of how his analysis of the problem shows the roots go
beyond merely a solution through the ballot box. The destruction of
America’s constitutional republic has become institutionalized, and may be
beyond cure by even an army of constitutional conservative legislators.

Cooper’s is a must-read essay for political commentators, conservative
elected officials, and anyone who is serious about trying to understand the
sad state of how America is governed today in violation of the Constitution.

Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/how_america_failed_to_keep_the_republic.html#ixzz3rIJS8hK8
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=dlia0Qbjyr4BNDacwqm_6l&u=AmericanThinker>
| AmericanThinker
on Facebook
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=dlia0Qbjyr4BNDacwqm_6l&u=AmericanThinker>


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdWVlbHNnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NDczNDQ4NjE->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOGZpZm5wBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ0NzM0NDg2MQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to