And hopefully you'll keep your  backwards Anti-Semitic racist ass out of
the United States.



On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:10 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Good.  Let them flock to New York and California.
> ---
> then you'll do your best jewish whine for the zionists who live there.
>
> Here in Florida, and most all Southern and Midwestern States, there will
> be no funding or aid provided to potential terrorists.
> ---
> you'll do what the federal government tells you to do, zioboy.
> nobody provides more aid and support to immigrants, legal or not, than
> jews and catholics, except the zionist controlled US government.
>
> but hey ... keep your sorry ass in zionist Florida with the jews, spics
> and niggers.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 10:25:05 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> John Doe wrote:
>>
>> *"I doubt very few Syrian refugees would choose zionist Florida."*
>>
>> Good.  Let them flock to New York and California.  Here in Florida, and
>> most all Southern and Midwestern States, there will be no funding or aid
>> provided to potential terrorists.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:10 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In Florida, Governor Scott has already mandated that no Syrian Refugees
>>> will be financially supported by the State.
>>> ---
>>> that's fine ... just lay it off on the rest of Americans who aren't as
>>> islamophobic as zionist Florida.
>>>
>>>  It's true that the States and in particular the Governors have less
>>> control over immigration than the Congress or the President, but make no
>>> mistake, "IF"  the State doesn't want these refugees, the feds will be hard
>>> pressed to place them.
>>> ---
>>> Florida has no choice but to obey the federal government. That war was
>>> fought 150 years ago.
>>>
>>>  Just as important, the refugee has some say in their placement.  If
>>> they have no connection to the locale that they are going to be placed in, (
>>> *e.g.*; relatives, job, etc.)  then it will be virtually impossible to
>>> be placed in a locale with no means of financial support or aid.
>>> ---
>>> I doubt very few Syrian refugees would choose zionist Florida.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 9:47:50 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In Florida, Governor Scott has already mandated that no Syrian Refugees
>>>> will be financially supported by the State.  It's true that the States and
>>>> in particular the Governors have less control over immigration than the
>>>> Congress or the President, but make no mistake, "IF"  the State doesn't
>>>> want these refugees, the feds will be hard pressed to place them.  Just as
>>>> important, the refugee has some say in their placement.  If they have no
>>>> connection to the locale that they are going to be placed in, (*e.g.*;
>>>> relatives, job, etc.)  then it will be virtually impossible to be placed in
>>>> a locale with no means of financial support or aid.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:06 AM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seems that a family of 7 arrived here in NJ in spite of Governor
>>>>> Christie!!!
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> With more than two dozen governors objecting to a federal government
>>>>> plan to accept Syrian refugees, a spotlight has been placed on how the
>>>>> Constitution deals these matters.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the long run, Congress might have a bigger say in a federal policy
>>>>> decision that could see as many as 10,000 Syrian refugees accepted into 
>>>>> the
>>>>> United States in the coming year. State leaders, such as governors, and
>>>>> state legislatures have far fewer options.
>>>>>
>>>>> In general terms, the Constitutional power for the federal government,
>>>>> and not the states, to control immigration policies and laws comes from
>>>>> interpretations of Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 3 and 4, of the
>>>>> Constitution. A Supreme Court decision from 1941, *Hines v.
>>>>> Davidowitz* <http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/312/52.html>,
>>>>> explained the logic behind this, which involves conflicts between federal
>>>>> and state jurisdiction.
>>>>>
>>>>> In 1939, Pennsylvania established its own alien registration act,
>>>>> which required non-citizens to pay a fee to register within the state, 
>>>>> show
>>>>> a state ID card to police at all times, and present the same card to
>>>>> qualify to register to drive a car. At the same time, a federal alien
>>>>> registration act existed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Justice Hugo Black, writing for the majority, struck down the
>>>>> Pennsylvania law. “That the supremacy of the national power in the general
>>>>> field of foreign affairs, including power over immigration, naturalization
>>>>> and deportation, is made clear by the Constitution was pointed out by
>>>>> authors of The Federalist in 1787,9 and has since been given continuous
>>>>> recognition by this Court,” Black said. “The power to restrict, limit,
>>>>> regulate, and register aliens as a distinct group is not an equal and
>>>>> continuously existing concurrent power of state and nation, but that
>>>>> whatever power a state may have is subordinate to supreme national law.”
>>>>>
>>>>> “Our primary function is to determine whether, under the circumstances
>>>>> of this particular case, Pennsylvania’s law stands as an obstacle to the
>>>>> accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of
>>>>> Congress,” said Black.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the minority opinion, Justice Harlan Fiske Stone disagreed, saying
>>>>> the federal and state laws differed, even though they had the same general
>>>>> subject. “The national government has exclusive control over the admission
>>>>> of aliens into the United States, but after entry, an alien resident 
>>>>> within
>>>>> a state, like a citizen, is subject to the police powers of the state and,
>>>>> in the exercise of that power, state legislatures may pass laws applicable
>>>>> exclusively to aliens so long as the distinction taken between aliens and
>>>>> citizens is not shown to be without rational basis,” he argued.
>>>>>
>>>>> In 1980, Congress passed and the President signed the Refugee Act
>>>>> <http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/orr/resource/the-refugee-act>, which
>>>>> added details to earlier immigration acts that outlined a protocol for
>>>>> accepting refugees. The Act said the Department of Health and Human
>>>>> Services “shall consult regularly (not less often than quarterly) with
>>>>> State and local governments and private nonprofit voluntary agencies
>>>>> concerning the sponsorship process and the intended distribution of
>>>>> refugees among the States and localities before their placement in those
>>>>> States and localities.”
>>>>>
>>>>> In theory, the states could refuse to participate in these efforts to
>>>>> place refugees in their communities, and pose other barriers, such as
>>>>> blocking refugees from getting drivers’ licenses or access to some state
>>>>> services. But multiple legal experts who have commented publicly on the
>>>>> question see these efforts as limited and problematic.
>>>>>
>>>>> “The one thing I feel very comfortable saying is there is
>>>>> absolutely no constitutional power for a state to exclude anyone from its
>>>>> territories,” Stephen Legomsky, a Washington University of St. Louis law
>>>>> professor, told USA Today on Monday
>>>>> <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/11/16/governors-have-little-power-block-refugees/75888766/>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> Another problem for the states is that much of the relocation funding
>>>>> they control originates with the federal government.
>>>>>
>>>>> Florida Governor Rick Scott is opposed to having Syrian refugees in
>>>>> Florida under the current system. But he has acknowledged that state
>>>>> leaders are limited in how they can handle Syrian refugees, and that it
>>>>> would be up to Congress to act in some fashion.
>>>>>
>>>>> “Please take any action available through the powers of the United
>>>>> States Congress to prevent federal allocations toward the relocation of
>>>>> Syrian refugees without extensive examination into how this would affect
>>>>> our homeland security,” Scott said in a public letter to House
>>>>> Speaker Paul Ryan.
>>>>> <http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-rick-scott-syrian-refugees-post.html>
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaker Ryan and Republican congressional leaders could attempt to
>>>>> tie funding
>>>>> <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/gop-lawmakers-syria-refugees-215936>
>>>>>  for
>>>>> these refugee aid programs to an upcoming appropriations bill that needs 
>>>>> to
>>>>> be passed by December 11, to avoid a government shutdown.
>>>>>
>>>>> But on Tuesday, Ryan and GOP leaders said they wanted to fast track a
>>>>> bill to stop Syrian refugee efforts for now and come up with a new plan to
>>>>> figure out if some refugees pose security threats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Read more at
>>>>> http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/Does_the_Constitution_allow_states_to_ban_refugees.html#GZlTLFqHOkD5E36q.99
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 8:18:57 AM UTC-6, brine wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/01/nyregion/syrian-family-of-7-is-quickly-settled-in-new-jersey.html?_r=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems that a family of 7 arrived here in NJ in spite of Governor
>>>>>> Christie!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BareNakedIslam posted: "Bet you could put up a few dozen in the
>>>>>>> White House, Barry. And Hillary, surely you have room for several of 
>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>> 'widows and children?' Even better, how about asking Chelsea to give 
>>>>>>> refuge
>>>>>>> to one of the 'refujihadis' in her $10 million condo in NYC? Sur"
>>>>>>> New post on *BARE NAKED ISLAM*
>>>>>>> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1> Hey, Obama! Hey, Clinton!
>>>>>>> Are these the Syrian widows and 3-year-old orphans you keep whining 
>>>>>>> about?
>>>>>>> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/12/01/hey-obama-hey-clinton-are-these-the-syrian-widows-and-3-year-old-orphans-you-keep-whining-about/>
>>>>>>>  by
>>>>>>> BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bet you could put up a few dozen in the White House, Barry. And
>>>>>>> Hillary, surely you have room for several of these 'widows and 
>>>>>>> children?'
>>>>>>> Even better, how about asking Chelsea to give refuge to one of the
>>>>>>> 'refujihadis' in her $10 million condo in NYC? Surely, little Charlotte
>>>>>>> could use a big brother.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Read more of this post
>>>>>>> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/12/01/hey-obama-hey-clinton-are-these-the-syrian-widows-and-3-year-old-orphans-you-keep-whining-about/>
>>>>>>> *BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>* |
>>>>>>> December 1, 2015 at 3:56 am | Categories: Muslim Invaders
>>>>>>> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?taxonomy=category&term=muslim-invaders>
>>>>>>> | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-1jAE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Comment
>>>>>>> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/12/01/hey-obama-hey-clinton-are-these-the-syrian-widows-and-3-year-old-orphans-you-keep-whining-about/#respond>
>>>>>>>    See all comments
>>>>>>> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/12/01/hey-obama-hey-clinton-are-these-the-syrian-widows-and-3-year-old-orphans-you-keep-whining-about/#comments>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe
>>>>>>> <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=9a7ed2eca0a37fc8484230edc68d3f28&email=bovinescatologists%40gmail.com&b=sC-j8YLHJ%2C%2F%5B5jY%26%3DsebWkCUHFxi%7C%5B9SmZaWeKpNFVUE3cmET>
>>>>>>> to no longer receive posts from BARE NAKED ISLAM.
>>>>>>> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
>>>>>>> <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=9a7ed2eca0a37fc8484230edc68d3f28&email=bovinescatologists%40gmail.com>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/12/01/hey-obama-hey-clinton-are-these-the-syrian-widows-and-3-year-old-orphans-you-keep-whining-about/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> brine
>>>>>> http://brineb.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>
>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to