What Really Should Be Done about Muslim Immigration --- should'a thought about that when our immigration laws were being hijacked. how's that non-european immigration working for you?
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 2:34:55 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Banning sharia law and closing mosques which preach it is tantamount to > banning Islam which = Trump’s “ban Muslim immigration” … only more subtle. > > > > B > > > > > > > https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2015/12/9/forget-trump-what-really-should-b/?singlepage=true > > > Forget Trump — What Really Should Be Done about Muslim Immigration > > > > By Roger L Simon <https://pjmedia.com/columnist/roger-l-simon> December > 9, 2015 > > *chat* 340 comments > <https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2015/12/9/forget-trump-what-really-should-b/?singlepage=true#comments> > > [image: Description: > https://pajamasmed.hs.llnwd.net/e1/diaryofamadvoter/user-content/47/files/2015/12/amuslim.sized-770x415xc.jpg] > > Forget Trump -- What Really Should Be Done about Muslim Immigration > > [image: Description: > https://assets.pinterest.com/images/pidgets/pinit_fg_en_rect_red_28.png] > > As half the world knows by now, Donald Trump has gone "Full Monty" on > Muslim immigration, calling for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims > entering the United States." > > That's our Donald -- never a master of understatement! (But he certainly > knows how to make monkeys out of the media -- kudos for that.) > > Like most commentators, however, I don't agree with him -- I support the > Constitution and its freedoms -- but to deny we have a gigantic Muslim > problem in this country and in the world is to be a troglodyte of epic > proportions. Something has to be done, domestically *and* > internationally, even if it's not Donald's "Full Monty." > > But since this is about immigration, let's deal with the domestic side for > a moment. > > The source of the conundrum is not just Syrian refugees; it's the entire > Middle East. Almost all people visiting or immigrating from the area are > potential jihadists, not to mention other Muslims across the world from > Western Europe to Indonesia. This isn't racial profiling -- it's reality. > The husband and wife fanatics who wreaked havoc in San Bernardino did time > in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, both of which masquerade as allies. Despite > what might seem like red flags in their backgrounds, the couple passed > blithely into this country without incident. > > The wife, apparently, even gave a place of birth in Pakistan that is > non-existent. Was there actually any* real *vetting? Our border people > all should spend some time in Israel, learning how you do these things. > Obviously, they don't know. In this sense, Trump is entirely correct. At > present, our border security is nearly worthless. > > The FBI isn't a whole lot better. They're now claiming the couple was > "radicalized." What does that mean? Not much. In fact, it's meaningless. > The wife at least came from a culture where the process of Islamic > anti-Western indoctrination begins essentially at birth. If you think that > is an exaggeration, spend ten minutes at MEMRI.or > <http://www.memri.org/middle-east-med…>g. If Tashfeen Malik and Syed > Farook were "radicalized," then literally hundreds of millions have been. > > How many such people have infiltrated our country? The indisputable answer > is that nobody knows. > > So what is to be done? > > Assuming we don't want to follow Trump's lead and violate the principles > of our nation, how do we separate the wholesome wheat from the > mass-murdering chaff? > > Marco Rubio and others have suggested taking the brakes off our > intelligence services. Given the inadequate vetting, I don't think we have > a choice. But there as several other things. > > *Most of all, we must outlaw Sharia. *Sharia law, with its > institutionalized doctrinal misogyny and homophobia as well as its primacy > of mosque over state (not to mention cruel and unusual punishments for > adultery, etc.), is completely inconsistent with our Constitution and the > values of our country and Western civilization. Further, adherence to > Sharia encourages the lack of assimilation, the self-ghettoization, endemic > to much of our Muslim population. This resistance to assimilation > creates insular communities that form the equivalent of petri dishes for > jihadist terror. This must be ended if Muslims are to stay here as > participating members of our society. > > When immigrants arrive, they must be made aware of all this explicitly and > *at > length* and pledge in writing not to observe Sharia, if they wish to > remain in America. This should be accompanied by a warning that those who > continue to follow Sharia will be summarily expelled from the U.S. Yes, a > number will lie, but once a few have been sent home, the message will get > across. > > Further, any mosques that preach the primacy of Sharia should be closed > down as in violation of the U.S. Constitution. > > As a precedent, the Communist Party was made illegal in the United States > because it advocated the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. > Sharia-based Islam is at least as bad and arguably worse in its calls for > world domination through jihad. > > Those Muslims who follow the laws of our country should be free to stay > here and welcomed into our communities, not into Islamic ghettoes like > Hamtramck. Unfortunately, only a small number of Muslims so far have shown > themselves to be true "moderates" able to stand up overtly to the > jihadists. Perhaps some stringent legislation could encourage more to come > out. At the very least, if we are truly strict with our vetting process, we > can all feel more comfortable with those that are here -- and they with us. > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmanA2bXJoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NDk2OTIzNTI-> > > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaTkyZWJqBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ0OTY5MjM1Mw--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
