WOW....I can't wait to see the lines of Terrorists lined up applying for  
an American Visa and checking "yes" that they are in fact a 
terrorist....these  government officials are absolute and complete fools and 
this revision 
went  through their system of approvals BEFORE being added to the application  
form.  No wonder we are in such trouble with fools like this in charge of  
the government!!!
 
From:  [email protected]
Reply-to: [email protected]
To:  [email protected]
Sent: 12/10/2015 5:18:16 A.M. Pacific  Standard Time
Subj: Fwd: [grendelreport] Visa Application Asks: 'Do You  Seek to Engage 
in Terrorist Activities While in the United States?'


 

 









http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/visa-application-asks
-do-you-seek-engage-terrorist-activities-while 
 
Visa Application Asks: ‘Do You Seek  to Engage in Terrorist Activities 
While in the United States?’

By  _Patrick Goodenough_ (http://www.cnsnews.com/author/patrick-goodenough) 
 | December 9, 2015   
 

(CNSNews.com)  – The application form that San Bernardino terrorist 
Tashfeen Malik would  have used to apply for her visa to enter the United 
States 
asks such  questions as, “Do you seek to engage in terrorist activities while 
in the  United States or have you ever engaged in terrorist  activities?” 
“Are you a  member or representative of a terrorist organization,” asks 
another  question, to which the Pakistani citizen would have been required to 
check  a “yes” or “no” box. 
“Have you  ever or do you intend to provide financial assistance or other 
support to  terrorists or terrorist organizations?” asks a third, along with 
similar  questions relating to espionage, human trafficking, money 
laundering,  prostitution and other offenses. 
According  to the State Department Malik, who with her U.S.-born husband 
Syed Farook  killed 14 people in last Tuesday’s attack at a social services 
center in  San Bernardino, entered the U.S. in July 2014 on a K-1 fiancé(e)  
visa. 
President  Obama said in his Oval Office _address_ 
(https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/06/address-nation-president)
  on Sunday night 
that he has ordered a review  into the visa program which had allowed Malik 
to enter the  U.S. 
(Obama  mistakenly referred to “the visa waiver program,” but the White 
House  corrected the transcript, striking through the word “waiver.” The 
_visa waiver  program_ (http://www.dhs.gov/visa-waiver-program)  applies to 38 
specified countries – most of them in Europe,  plus Australia, New Zealand, 
Chile, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Brunei and  Singapore.) 
State  Department spokesman John Kirby said Tuesday that Secretary of State 
John  Kerry wants the review to be done “as aggressively and openly and  
transparently as possible.” 
“We take  this very, very seriously,” he said. “Nothing is more important 
to  Secretary Kerry than the safety and security of the American people and  
making sure that if there are improvements and changes we need to make in  
this or any other program in which people are entering this country on a  
permanent or semi-permanent basis, if there’s anything that we need to do  to 
improve that, we’re going to do that.” 
When  Farook wanted to bring Malik to the U.S., he would have been required 
to  submit a petition to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a  
component of the Department of Homeland Security  (DHS). 
In his  application form (I-129F) he would be asked about his own 
background,  including questions on criminal offenses. He would not have had to 
answer  questions on the form about his fiancée’s background beyond 
biographical  
data, but would have had to explain how the two met, and whether they had  “
meet and seen” each other during the preceding two  years. 
Once his  application was approved by DHS, the National Visa Center would 
have sent  the petition to the relevant U.S. Embassy or Consulate – Islamabad 
in  Malik’s case. 
According  to the laid-down procedures, Malik would then have undergone a  
face-to-face interview with a consular officer at the U.S. mission. She  
would have filled out nonimmigrant visa application form D-160, which  contains 
the questions about terrorism etc. 
She would  also have had to bring to the interview her travel itinerary if 
she had  one, details of any previous trips to the U.S., and a resume. She 
would  have undergone a medical check. 
‘We stand  behind our screening process for visas’ 
The State  Department will not discuss Malik’s visa application 
specifically, on the  grounds that visa records are confidential under the 
Immigration 
and  Nationality Act (INA). 
But at  last Friday’s daily briefing – before Obama said he had instructed 
the  State Department and DHS to investigate the visa program – spokeswoman 
 Elizabeth Trudeau did speak about the process in general  terms. 
“All of  our visa screening process go through multiple layers of security, 
 including fingerprints, face-to-face interviews, the full assortment of  
background screenings,” she said. 
Asked  whether she was satisfied that Malik’s application process would 
have  followed the proper protocols she replied in the  affirmative. 
“How can  you say that with such assurance?” a reporter  asked. 
“Because  we stand behind our screening process for visas. What I will say 
is that  the State Department remains committed to the security of the 
homeland. We  – our process we continue to revise. We continue to look at this. 
But  these are process that happens around the world every day in our U.S.  
embassies,” Trudeau said. 
“And while  we won’t get ahead of this investigation, the process that 
visa applicants  go through continues to be improved,” she added. “It was 
improved after  9/11 – something that we look at every day.” 
Asked  whether she could “say with absolute confidence that no one dropped 
the  ball in this case,” Trudeau replied, “At this stage I have no 
information  that indicates that.” 
Under the  INA, applicants can be deemed ineligible for a number of 
reasons, such as  overstaying a previous visa or submitting fraudulent  
documents. 
Other  grounds for ineligibility include having engaged in, incited, 
endorsed,  espoused or funded terrorist activity or persuaded others to do so; 
having  been a member of a designated foreign terrorist organization, or having 
 received military-type training from such an  organization. 
Once the  application was approved, Malik would have been issued with a K-1 
visa,  allowing her to apply for a single admission to a U.S. port-of-entry 
 within six months. Once she entered the U.S., she and Farook would have  
had to marry within 90 days. 



__._,_.___
  
____________________________________
 Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) >   
____________________________________
 


_Visit Your Group_ 
(https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNDVrcnVtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMy
MzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NDk3MDQzODE-)   


 
(https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOXBvdDJxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ0OTcw
NDM4Mg--)  
• _Privacy_ (https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html)  •
 _Unsubscribe_ 
(mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe)  • 
_Terms of Use_ 
(https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/)  



__,_._,___






-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google  Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

*  Visit our other community at _http://www.PoliticalForum.com/_ 
(http://www.politicalforum.com/)   
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
*  Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this  message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum"  group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from  it, send an 
email to [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) .
For  more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.





-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to