https://www.eff.org/issues/know-your-rights
Know Your Rights

*Last Updated October 2014*

By Hanni Fakhoury <https://www.eff.org/about/staff/hanni-fakhoury> and Nadia
Kayyali <https://www.eff.org/about/staff/nadia-kayyali>

Your computer, phone, and other digital devices hold vast amounts of
personal information about you and your family. This sensitive data is
worth protecting from prying eyes, including those of the government.

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects you from
unreasonable government searches and seizures, and this protection extends
to your computer and portable devices. But how does this work in the real
world? What should you do if the police or other law enforcement officers
show up at your door and want to search your computer?

EFF has designed this guide to help you understand your rights if officers
try to search the data stored on your computer or portable electronic
device, or seize it for further examination somewhere else. Keep in mind
that the Fourth Amendment is the minimum standard, and your specific state
may have stronger protections.

Because anything you say can be used against you in a criminal or civil
case, before speaking to any law enforcement official, you should consult
with an attorney. Remember‚ generally the fact that you assert your rights
cannot legally be used against you in court. You can always state: "I do
not want to talk to you or answer any questions without my attorney
present." If they continue to ask you questions after that point, you can
say: "Please don’t ask me any further questions until my attorney is
present." And if the police violate your rights and conduct an illegal
search, often the evidence they obtain as a result of that search can’t be
used against you.

We’ve organized this guide into three sections:

   - Overview: When can the police search my devices?
   - The police have a warrant. Now what?
   - The police can’t get in to my computer. Now what?

Overview: When can the police search my devices?

   - If you consent to a search, the police don’t need a warrant.
   - Law enforcement may show up at your door. Apart from a few exceptions,
   police need a warrant to enter your home.
   - Be aware that the police can ask your roommate/guest/spouse/partner
   for access to your computer if they don’t have a warrant.
   - Even if you're arrested, police can only search your phone under
   limited circumstances.
   - Police can search your computer or portable devices at the border
   without a warrant.

*If you consent to a search, the police don’t need a warrant.*

The most frequent way police are able to search is by asking you for
permission. If you say “yes” and consent to the search, then police don’t
need a warrant. You can limit the scope of that consent and even revoke or
take it back after the officers begin searching, but by then it may be too
late.1 That’s why it’s better not consent to a search--police may drop the
matter. If not, then they will generally need to get a search warrant to
search.

*Law enforcement may show up at your door. Apart from a few exceptions,
police need a warrant to enter your home. *

The police can’t simply enter your home to search it or any electronic
device inside, like a laptop or cell phone, without a warrant.

When the police knock on your door, you do not have to let them in unless
they have in their possession and show you a valid search warrant. The
safest thing to do is step outside and shut the door behind you. They may
or may not indicate right away why they are there. If they have a warrant,
ask to see it. If they offer to simply “interview” you, it is better to
decline to speak until your attorney can be present. You can do this by
telling the officer: “I do not want to talk to you. I do not consent to a
search. I want to speak to my attorney.”

There are two major *exceptions* to the warrant requirement. First, if you
consent to a search, then the police can search within the scope of your
consent.2 That’s why it is usually better to not consent to a search.

Second, if police have probable cause to believe there is incriminating
evidence in the house or on an electronic device that is under immediate
threat of destruction, they can immediately search it without a warrant.3

*Be aware that the police can ask your roommate/guest/spouse/partner for
access to your computer if they don’t have a warrant.*

The rules around who can consent to a search are fuzzy. The key is who has
control over an item. Anyone can consent to a search as long as the
officers reasonably believe the third person has control over the thing to
be searched.4 However, the police cannot search if one person with control
(for example a spouse) consents, but another individual (the other spouse)
with control explicitly refuses.5 It's unclear, however, whether this rule
applies to items like a hard drive placed into someone else’s computer.6
And even where two people have control over an item or place, police can
remove the non-consenting person and return to get the other's consent to
search.7

You may want to share this know your rights guide with everyone in your
home and ask them not to consent to a search by law enforcement.

*Even if you're arrested, police can only search your phone under limited
circumstances. *

After a person has been arrested, the police generally may search the items
on her person and in her pockets, as well as anything within her immediate
control, automatically and without a warrant. But the Supreme Court has
ruled that police cannot search the data on a cell phone under this warrant
exception.8 Police can, however, search the physical aspects of the phone
(like removing the phone from its case or removing the battery) and in
situations where they actually believe evidence on the phone is likely to
be immediately destroyed, police can search the cell phone without a
warrant.

*Police can search your computer or portable devices at the border without
a warrant. *

Fourth Amendment protection is not as strong at the border as it is in your
home or office.9 This means that law enforcement can inspect your computer
or electronic equipment, even if they have no reason to suspect there is
anything illegal on it.10 An international airport, even if many miles from
the actual border, is considered the functional equivalent of a border.11
However, border officials in Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii,
Idaho, Montana, Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon and Washington can only
confiscate an electronic device and conduct a more thorough “forensic”
examination of it if they have reasonable suspicion you’ve engaged in
criminal behavior.12
The police have a warrant. Now what?

   - Ask to see the warrant.
   - The warrant limits what the police can do.
   - Although the warrant limits what the police can look for, if they see
   something illegal while executing a warrant they can take it.
   - If the police want to search your computer, it doesn't matter whether
   you’re the subject of their investigation.
   - You do not have to assist law enforcement when they are conducting
   their search.
   - You do not have to answer questions while law enforcement is
   searching. <http://”#13”>

*Ask to see the warrant. *

A warrant is a document signed by a judge giving the police permission to
either arrest you or search your property and take certain items from that
property. You have the right to see the warrant and should check to make
sure it is valid.

A warrant should contain:

   - The correct name of the person arrested or the correct address of the
   specific place to be searched;
   - A list of the items that can be seized or taken by the police;
   - The judge’s signature;
   - A deadline for when the arrest or search must take place



The police must take the warrant with them when executing it and give you a
copy of it.13 They must also knock and announce their entry before they try
to forcefully enter your home,14 and must serve the warrant during the day
in most circumstances.15



*The warrant limits what the police can do. *

The purpose of the warrant is to give the judge, not the police, the
discretion to decide what places can be searched and which items can be
taken.16 That’s why a warrant is supposed to state exactly what the police
can search and seize.17 However, if the warrant authorizes the police to
search for evidence of a particular crime, and such evidence is likely to
be found on your computer, some courts have allowed the police to search
the computer without a warrant.18

And remember, if you consent to a search, it doesn’t matter if the police
have a warrant; any search is permissible as long as the search is
consistent with the scope of your consent.

*Although the warrant limits what the police can look for, if they see
something illegal while executing a warrant they can take it. *

While the police are searching your home, if they observe something in
"plain view" that is suspicious or incriminating, they may take it for
further examination and can rely on their observation to later get a search
warrant.19 For example, if police see an open laptop with something
obviously illegal on the screen, they could seize that laptop.

*If the police want to search your computer, it doesn’t matter whether
you’re the subject of their investigation.*

It typically doesn’t matter whether the police are investigating you, or
think there is evidence they want to use against someone else located on
your computer. If they have a warrant, if you consent to the search, or
they think there is something incriminating on your computer that may be
immediately destroyed, the police can search it. But remember, regardless
of whether you’re the subject of an investigation, you can always seek the
assistance of the lawyer.

*You do not have to assist law enforcement when they are conducting their
search.*

You do not have to help the police conduct the search. But you should not
physically interfere with them, obstruct the search or try to destroy
evidence, since that can lead to your arrest. This is true even if the
police don’t have a warrant and you do not consent to the search, but the
police insist on searching anyway. In that instance, do not interfere but
write down the names and badge numbers of the officers and immediately call
a lawyer.

*You do not have to answer questions while law enforcement is searching.*

You do not have to answer any questions. In fact, because anything you say
can be used against you and other individuals, it is best to say nothing at
all other than “I do not want to talk to you. I do not consent to a search.
I want to speak to my attorney.” However, if you do decide to answer
questions, be sure to tell the truth. In many contexts, it is a crime to
lie to a police officer and you may find yourself in more trouble for lying
to law enforcement than for whatever it was on your computer they wanted.20
The police can’t get in to my computer. Now what?

   - The police can take your computer with them and search it somewhere
   else.
   - You do not have to hand over your encryption keys or passwords to law
   enforcement.
   - You may be able to get your computer back if it is taken and searched.
   - There is less protection against a search at a place of employment.

*The police can take your computer with them and search it somewhere else.*

As long as the police have a warrant, they can seize the computer and take
it somewhere else to search it more thoroughly. As part of that inspection,
the police may make a copy of media or other files stored on your computer.
21

*You do not have to hand over your encryption keys or passwords to law
enforcement.*

The Fifth Amendment protects you from being forced to give the government
self-incriminating testimony. Courts have generally accepted that telling
the government a password or encryption key is “testimony.” A police
officer cannot force or threaten you into giving up your password or
unlocking your electronic devices. However, a judge or a grand jury may be
able to force you to decrypt your devices in some circumstances. Because
this is a legally complicated issue, if you find yourself in a situation
where the police, a judge or grand jury are demanding you turn over
encryption keys or passwords, you should let EFF know right away and seek
legal help.

*You may be able to get your computer back if it is taken and searched.*

If your computer was illegally taken, then you can file a motion with the
court to have it returned.22 If the police believe that evidence of a crime
has been found on your computer (such as possessing “digital contraband”
like pirated music and movies, or digital images of child pornography), the
police can keep the computer as evidence. They may also attempt to keep the
computer permanently, a legal process known as forfeiture, but you can
challenge forfeiture in court.23

*There is less protection against a search at a place of employment.*

Generally, you have some Fourth Amendment protection in your office or
workspace.24 This means the police need a warrant to search your office and
work computer unless one of the exceptions described above apply. But the
extent of Fourth Amendment protection depends on the physical details of
your work environment, as well as any employer policies. For example, the
police will have difficulty justifying a warrantless search of a private
office with doors and a lock and a private computer that you have exclusive
access to. On the other hand, if you share a computer with other
co-workers, you will have a weaker expectation of privacy in that computer,
and thus less Fourth Amendment protection.25 However, be aware that your
employer can consent to a police request to search an office or workspace
in your absence.26 Plus, if you work for a public entity or government
agency, no warrant is required to search your computer or office as long as
the search is for a non-investigative, work-related matter.27
Want to learn more about how to protect yourself from unreasonable
government searches and surveillance on your computer or portable
electronic devices?

   - EFF’s newly relaunched Surveillance Self-Defense (SSD)
   <https://ssd.eff.org/> is a guide to defending yourself and your friends
   from digital surveillance by using encryption tools and developing
   appropriate privacy and security practices.
   - EFF’s recently updated Cell Phone Guide for U.S. Protestors
   
<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/08/cell-phone-guide-protesters-updated-2014-edition>
   explains your rights, and how best to protect the data on your phone, at
   protests.


   - 1. *Florida v. Jimeno*, 500 U.S. 248, 252 (1991).
   - 2. *Schneckloth v. Bustamonte*,412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973); *United
   States v. Lopez-Cruz*, 730 F.3d 803, 809 (9th Cir. 2013); *United States
   v. Vanvliet*, 542 F.3d 259, 264 (1st Cir. 2008).
   - 3. *Ker v. California*, 374 U.S. 23, 39 (1963).
   - 4. *Illinois v. Rodriguez*, 497 U.S. 177, 181 (1990); *United States
   v. Stabile*, 633 F.3d 219, 230-31 (3d Cir. 2011); *United States v.
   Andrus*, 483 F.3d 711, 716 (10th Cir. 2007).
   - 5. *Georgia v. Randolph*, 547 U.S. 103, 106 (2006).
   - 6. *United States v. King*, 604 F.3d 125, 137 (3d Cir. 2010).
   - 7. *Fernandez v. California*, 134 S.Ct. 1126, 1134 (2014).
   - 8. *Riley v. California*, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2493 (2014).
   - 9. *United States v. Flores-Montano*, 541 U.S. 149, 152-53 (2004).
   - 10. *United States v. Arnold*, 533 F.3d 1003, 1009 (9th Cir.
2008); *United
   States v. Ickes*, 393 F.3d 501, 507 (4th Cir. 2005).
   - 11. *Almeida-Sanchez v. United States*, 413 U.S. 266, 273 (1973);
   *Arnold*, 533 F.3d at 1006 (9th Cir. 2008); *United States v. Romm*, 455
   F.3d 990, 996 (9th Cir. 2006); *United States v. Roberts*, 274 F.3d
   1007, 1011 (5th Cir. 2001).
   - 12. *United States v. Cotterman*, 709 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 2013)(en
   banc).
   - 13. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(f)(1)(C).
   - 14. *Wilson v. Arkansas*, 514 U.S. 927, 929 (1995).
   - 15. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e)(2)(A)(ii).
   - 16. *Marron v. United States*, 275 U.S. 192, 196 (1927).
   - 17. *Andresen v. Maryland*, 427 U.S. 463, 480 (1976).
   - 18. *United States v. Mann*, 592 F.3d 779, 786 (7th Cir. 2010); *Brown
   v. City of Fort Wayne*, 752 F.Supp.2d 925, 939 (N.D. Ind. 2010).
   - 19. *Horton v. California*, 496 U.S. 128, 133 (1990); *United States
   v. Walser*, 275 F.3d 981, 986 (10th Cir. 2001); *United States v. Carey*,
   172 F.3d 1268, 1272 (10th Cir. 1999).
   - 20. *Compare* 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a) (maximum punishment for first
   offense of lying to federal officer is 5 or 8 years) *with* 18 U.S.C. §§
   1030(a)(2) and (c)(2)(A) (maximum punishment for first offense of exceeding
   authorized computer access is 1 year).
   - 21. *United States v. Hill*, 459 F.3d 966, 974 (9th Cir. 2006); *In re
   Search of 3817 W. West End, First Floor Chicago, Illinois 60621*, 321
   F.Supp.2d 953, 958 (N.D. Ill. 2004); *see also* Federal Rule of Criminal
   Procedure 41(e)(2)(B).
   - 22. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g).
   - 23. *See* 18 U.S.C. §§ 982, 983; Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure
   32.2.
   - 24. *Mancusi v. DeForte*, 392 U.S. 364, 369 (1968); *United States v.
   Ziegler,* 474 F.3d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir. 2007).
   - 25. *Schowengerdt v. United States*, 944 F.2d 483, 488-89 (9th Cir.
   1991).
   - 26. *Ziegler*, 474 F.3d at 1191.
   - 27. *City of Ontario v. Quon*, 560 U.S. 746, 748 (2010); *O’Connor v.
   Ortega*, 480 U.S. 709, 722 (1987).





__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMmkzcWZ2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTAyMjA5NTY->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaTlnODZkBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MDIyMDk1Nw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to