Or here in Arkansas.

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:06 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> California cops can now seize guns from law-abiding Americans without
> charges and without giving any notice
> ---
> Californians are pussies.
> just let'em try that shit in TN, TX or FL.
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 1:28:02 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *New law lets cops confiscate guns without notice*
>>
>> Posted By *Chelsea Schilling* On 12/29/2015
>>
>>
>>
>> Under a new law effective New Year’s Day, California cops can now seize
>> guns from law-abiding Americans without charges and without giving any
>> notice.
>>
>> And police can keep those firearms for 21 days under the law known as AB
>> 1014
>> <https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB1014>
>> .
>>
>> If family members believe a gun-owning individual is a danger to
>> themselves or someone else, police may acquire a temporary “gun violence”
>> restraining order from a judge, KPCC public radio reported.
>>
>> California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the law after the 2014 shooting by
>> Elliot Rodger near the University of California, Santa Barbara. Rodger, 22,
>> killed six people and injured 14.
>>
>> Before his May 23 shooting spree, Rodger’s parents claim they expressed
>> concern about their son’s mental state and chilling online diatribes about
>> women.
>>
>> In his last YouTube video before the shooting, Rodger stated in what
>> appeared to be prepared remarks: “If I had it in my power, I would stop at
>> nothing to reduce every single one of you to mountains of skulls and rivers
>> of blood, and rightfully so.”
>>
>> Police officers who visited his apartment three weeks before the spree.
>> Rodger’s therapist and mother had told authorities they were concerned
>> about videos the man had posted online. But the officers – who never viewed
>> Rodger’s videos – determined he wasn’t a threat to himself and, therefore,
>> didn’t search his apartment or determine whether he owned guns.
>>
>> “In the case of the Isla Vista shooter, Elliot Rodger, his mother was
>> noticing that he was becoming more agitated and making these threats of
>> violence, but there was little she could do and little the police could
>> do,” said Democratic Assembly member Nancy Skinner of Berkeley, who
>> introduced the bill in 2014 along with Santa Barbara Democrat Das Williams.
>>
>> As of Friday, California’s new law would enable a judge to issue a
>> restraining order against a gun owner based on accounts from family and
>> police.
>>
>> “The law gives us a vehicle to cause the person to surrender their
>> weapons, to have a time out, if you will,” Los Angeles Police Department
>> Chief Michael Moore told KPCC. “It allows further examination of the
>> person’s mental state.”
>>
>> A gun owner may challenge the decision three weeks after the firearms are
>> confiscated.
>>
>> “It’s a short duration, and it allows for due process,” Moore contends.
>>
>> The law also requires the California court to notify the Department of
>> Justice when any gun violence restraining order has been issued, renewed,
>> dissolved or terminated.
>>
>> The state already bans citizens from owning firearms if they have
>> committed violent crimes or were involuntarily committed to mental health
>> facilities. Law-enforcement authorities are also permitted to confiscate
>> guns if a licensed therapist says the owner is a danger to the safety of
>> himself or others.
>>
>> Moore told KPCC the new firearms restraining order is comparable to a
>> domestic violence restraining order because no conviction is needed.
>>
>> “It’s an opportunity for mental health professionals to provide an
>> analysis of a person’s mental state,” he said, adding that he doesn’t
>> expect “tremendous” use of the new restraining orders by authorities.
>>
>> Meanwhile, gun-rights advocates are up in arms over the new law.
>>
>> Same Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California, told the
>> Associated Press: “We don’t need another law to solve this problem. We
>> think this just misses the mark and may create a situation where
>> law-abiding gun owners are put in jeopardy.”
>>
>> Charles H. Cunningham, a director with the NRA’s Institute for
>> Legislative Action, wrote
>> <http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-california-jerry-brown-gun-seizures-20140929-story.html>,
>> “Without a doubt, AB 1014 is one of the most egregious violations of civil
>> liberties ever introduced in the California Legislature.”
>>
>> And in 2014, Dr. Jason Kissner, associate professor of criminology at
>> California State University, Fresno, called the legislation
>> <http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/06/ab_1014_california_democrats_wage_war_on_the_constitution.html>
>> “the most draconian and flagrantly unconstitutional bill in the state’s,
>> and maybe even the nation’s, history.”
>>
>> Kissner warned “victims of this proposed law might have no idea they have
>> even been targeted until police show up at the door, *conceivably in the
>> middle of the night* …”
>>
>> URL to article: 
>> *http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/new-law-lets-cops-confiscate-guns-without-notice/
>> <http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/new-law-lets-cops-confiscate-guns-without-notice/>*
>>
>>
>> __._,_.___
>> ------------------------------
>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Visit Your Group
>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmY2w5ZGI1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTE1MDAxNTk->
>>
>>
>> [image: Yahoo! Groups]
>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYWprNnJqBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MTUwMDE2MA-->
>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html>
>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>>
>> __,_._,___
>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to