*Drudge posts WND poll on Trump, heads explode*

Posted By *Cheryl Chumley* On 12/30/2015

A Daily Beast columnist, Michael Tomasky, turned critical eyes on Matt
Drudge, king of the Internet news promotion hill, to ponder why the media
giant seemed to be going out of his way to bolster Donald Trump’s run at
the presidency – especially when it entails posting information from sites
like this very one, WND.com <http://www.wnd.com/>.

“The Drudge site is (gulp) its readers’ most trusted news source, and
nearly every day its playing a pro-Trump piece high up,” Tomasky wrote
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/30/why-is-matt-drudge-boosting-donald-trump.html>.
“As I write this … the story is ‘New poll shows Trump strong among
minorities
<http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/minorities-line-up-behind-donald-trump/>.’ The
link is to a story on World Net Daily, a far-right site whose stock in
trade is headlines like ‘Democrats Think Christians Bigger Threat Than
Muslims
<http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/democrats-think-christians-bigger-threat-than-muslims/>,’
and it’s to a poll commissioned by … World Net Daily! It finds that 40
percent of blacks are lining up behind Trump, as are 45 percent of
Hispanics, and even nearly 19 percent of Asians.’ Right.”

Tomasky admits Trump’s favor in the polls comes from a variety of factors.
But in his lead, he writes: “The Republican frontrunner owes his rise to a
whole host of factors. But Drudge’s conservative media behemoth could’ve
stopped him. Why didn’t it?”

He goes on to ask “who’s responsible for Donald Trump” and his lasting
popularity among voters? And among his answers: establishment Republican
Party chiefs, who’ve allowed the “crazy” GOP types, like Louis Gohmert,
Steve King and Michele Bachmann to direct political discourse, as well as
the “cable networks,” for allowing Trump to “play them like a fiddle,”
Tomasky wrote.

But “a less discussed culprit” is Drudge, who’s captivated with a site that
draws 700 million visitors each month, he went on.

“What they’ve been getting for the last six months is a steady stream of
pro-Trump agitprop,” he wrote. “Drudge’s own weird, quasi-libertarian,
crypto-racialist-populist political views have found their perfect echo in
Trump’s campaign. If you’ve read the Drudge site over the years, you know
how expert the site has always been at finding and promoting news stories
that aren’t capital-P political on their face but whose political moral,
and the reason Drudge highlights them, is obvious.”

For example: “A preposterous-sounding grievance from a minority group
member; a left-wing academic making some nutty claim or another; some new
manifestation of political correctness afoot,” he wrote.

“These stories are the mother’s milk of the site,” Tomasky went on, “and
they create the same paranoia that Trump is creating, and among the same
audience. And the audience is gobbling it up, and regurgitating it in the
hoped-for way. … After every GOP debate, the Drudge site polls its readers
on who won. And every time, Trump has won, usually big.”

Tomasky then opined that while Trump probably didn’t need Drudge’s support
to “get where he is” in today’s polls, “look at it from the reverse point
of view: If Drudge had been anti-Trump these last six months, Trump very
well might not be where he is right now,” he wrote.

And on a Trump-Hillary Clinton match-up?

Tomasky said that’s Drudge’s dream: “Destroying, or trying to destroy, a
Clinton (Bill) is what made Drudge world famous in the first place, back in
1998. But that didn’t work out for him,” he wrote.

URL to article:
*http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/drudge-posts-wnd-story-on-trump-heads-explode/
<http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/drudge-posts-wnd-story-on-trump-heads-explode/>*


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbHNkaDdsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTE1NzgwODk->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZDZyNWZuBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MTU3ODA4OQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to