http://www.wsj.com/article_email/the-mullahs-thank-mr-obama-1451675145-lMyQjAxMTI2MTAxMjEwODI3Wj
The Mullahs Thank Mr. Obama

[image: An Islamic Mullah walks past a portrait of the late Ayatollah
Khomeini in Qom, Iran.]

An Islamic Mullah walks past a portrait of the late Ayatollah Khomeini in
Qom, Iran. *Photo: Getty Images *

Updated Jan. 1, 2016 4:40 p.m. ET

President Obama imagined he could end his second term with an arms-control
detente with Iran the way Ronald Reagan did with the Soviet Union. It looks
instead that his nuclear deal has inspired Iran toward new military
aggression and greater anti-American hostility.

The U.S. and United Nations both say Iran is already violating U.N.
resolutions that bar Iran from testing ballistic missiles. Iran has
conducted two ballistic-missile tests since the nuclear deal was signed in
July, most recently in November. The missiles seem capable of delivering
nuclear weapons with relatively small design changes.

The White House initially downplayed the missile tests, but this week it
did an odd flip-flop on whether to impose new sanctions in response. On
Wednesday it informed Congress that it would target a handful of Iranian
companies and individuals responsible for the ballistic-missile program.
Then it later said it would delay announcing the sanctions, which are
barely a diplomatic rebuke in any case, much less a serious response to an
arms-control violation.

Under the nuclear accord, Iran will soon receive $100 billion in unfrozen
assets as well as the ability to court investors who are already streaming
to Tehran. Sanctioning a few names is feckless by comparison, and Iran is
denouncing even this meager action as a U.S. violation of the nuclear deal.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani responded to the sanctions reports on
Thursday by ordering his defense minister to *accelerate* Iran’s missile
program. Your move, Mr. Obama.

Opponents of the nuclear accord predicted this. Mr. Obama says the deal
restricts Iranian action, but it does far more to restrict the ability of
the U.S. to respond to Iranian aggression. If the U.S. takes tough action
in response to Iran’s missile tests or other military provocations, Iran
can threaten to stop abiding by the nuclear deal. It knows the world has no
appetite for restoring serious sanctions, and that Mr. Obama will never
admit his deal is failing. The mullahs view the accord as a license to
become more militarily aggressive.

Further proof came Wednesday when U.S. Central Command acknowledged that
Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessels last week fired several rockets that
landed within 1,500 yards of the aircraft carrier Harry S. Truman. A
Revolutionary Guard spokesman Thursday denied the incident but a day
earlier the semiofficial Tabnak news agency quoted an unnamed Iranian
official as saying the rockets were launched to warn the U.S. Navy away
from “a forbidden zone” in the Persian Gulf.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most heavily trafficked
waterways, and the USS Truman carrier group has every right to sail there.
By any measure the rocket launch was a hostile act that could have resulted
in American casualties.

This follows Iran’s arrest in October of Iranian-American businessman
Siamak Namazi, who according to Iranian media reports is being held in Evin
Prison though no charges have been filed. The reports suggest that Mr.
Namazi is suspected of spying because he is one of the World Economic
Forum’s “Young Global Leaders.” That’s the dangerous outfit that sponsors
the annual gabfest in Davos.

Iran has also shown its gratitude for the nuclear deal by convicting
Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian on absurd charges of espionage. The
Iranian-American has been held for more than 500 days.

The White House’s media allies are blaming all of this on Iranian
“hard-liners” who are supposedly trying to undermine President Rouhani for
having negotiated the nuclear deal. Memo to these amateur Tehranologists:
The hard-liners run Iran.

Mr. Rouhani was only able to complete the nuclear deal because Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Revolutionary Guard decided the terms
were in their interests. They get serious sanctions lifted and an immediate
financial windfall, while retaining the nuclear infrastructure they can
fire up when the accord expires after a decade, if they don’t find an
excuse to do so sooner.

The sages now blaming hard-liners for Iran’s nastiness are the same folks
who told us that the nuclear accord would empower the “moderates” in Iran
by showing America’s peaceful intentions. When will this crowd figure out
that Iran’s rulers don’t want better relations with the U.S.? They want to
become the dominant power in the Middle East while driving the U.S. out of
the region.
***

Mr. Obama’s ambition to emulate Reagan’s success was never realistic
because he pursued the opposite of the Reagan strategy. The Gipper stood up
to Soviet aggression, rebuilt U.S. defenses, and then negotiated from
strength. The Soviets bent to his terms.

>From his first days in office Mr. Obama begged Iran to negotiate, making
concession after concession until even the Ayatollah had to accept. It’s no
surprise Iran has concluded that it can now press its military ambitions
with impunity.



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOXJnOXVmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTE4NTIyODU->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJla21rZzM2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MTg1MjI4Ng-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to