Hmmm.....I wonder if the FBI thinks we're stupid?
---
that your ignorance makes you question FBI stats says tons.

On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:30:24 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Hmmm.....I wonder if the FBI thinks we're stupid?
>
> Here's statistics from 2012, which shows a dramatic increase in crime:
>
> http://www.gallup.com/poll/165653/crime-americans-seem-noticed.aspx
>
> That, coupled with the recent increase in most major cities, and the FBI 
> claims (like their claim that White folks are committing all of the 
> terrorism in the Nation!)  just doesn't wash:
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/01/us/murder-rates-rising-sharply-in-many-us-cities.html
>
> http://www.freerangekids.com/crime-statistics/
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:18 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Washington (CNN)The FBI says crime rates, including murder, were down 
>> last year. The report is in contrast to headlines this year about a surge 
>> in killings in some major cities.
>>
>> The annual Uniform Crime Report statistics released Monday come amid 
>> lingering tension over police shootings and the relationship between 
>> officers and minority communities.
>>
>>    
>> To that end, FBI Director James Comey said in a memo released with the 
>> report that the FBI plans to collect more data about shootings of civilians 
>> by law enforcement in order to address concerns about appropriate use of 
>> force. He called on more law enforcement agencies to submit data to the FBI 
>> on so-called justifiable homicides.
>>
>> The FBI report shows a 0.2% decline nationwide in violent crimes in 2014, 
>> with more than 11 million arrests made by police for almost a half-million 
>> violent crimes.
>>
>> The report says that in 2014 the U.S. recorded the fewest murders since 
>> 2009. Most other violent crimes, such as robbery, burglary, theft and arson 
>> have declined, while aggravated assaults and rapes, which now includes a 
>> broader definition, were on the rise in 2014.
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:05:33 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> You know, the writer was begining to sway me.  I can understand Cruz's 
>>> frustration, in that talking to liberals is like talking to a wall, they 
>>> hear nothing and consider nothing other than their usual misguided 
>>> perception, and as usual; their perception is usually uninformed or 
>>> misinformed.
>>>
>>> Then, the writer wrote this:
>>>
>>>
>>> *"The fact is this apocalyptic diagnosis is ridiculous. The Obama 
>>> administration has done things people like me strongly disagree with. But 
>>> America is in better economic shape than any other major nation on earth. 
>>> Crime is down. Abortion rates are down. Fourteen million new jobs have been 
>>> created in five years."*
>>>
>>>
>>> The writer lost all credibility; and clearly doesn't know what he or she 
>>> is talking about.
>>>
>>> America has an 18 trillion dollar debt, the largest ever in our history, 
>>> and a governmental debt created that is larger than all previous 43 
>>> Presidents.
>>>
>>> Crime is not down, it is now growing (within the last two years) 
>>> exponentially.  
>>>
>>> Abortion is at record levels.  
>>>
>>> The myth that 14 million new jobs have been created, or that our 
>>> unemployment rate is something like 5 percent is also Democratic/Moonbat 
>>> prevaricate lies.   There are more Americans out of work than ever before, 
>>> including the Great Depression.
>>>
>>> It's clear who this writer will be voting for.....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:04 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In 1997, Michael Wayne Haley was arrested after stealing a calculator 
>>>> from Walmart. This was a crime that merited a maximum two-year prison 
>>>> term. 
>>>> But prosecutors incorrectly applied a habitual offender law. Neither the 
>>>> judge nor the defense lawyer caught the error and Haley was sentenced to 
>>>> 16 
>>>> years.
>>>>
>>>> Eventually, the mistake came to light and Haley tried to fix it. Ted 
>>>> Cruz was solicitor general of Texas at the time. Instead of just letting 
>>>> Haley go for time served, Cruz took the case to the Supreme Court 
>>>> <http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/11/lazarus.dretke/> to keep Haley in 
>>>> prison for the full 16 years.
>>>>
>>>> Some justices were skeptical. “Is there some rule that you can’t 
>>>> confess error in your state?” Justice Anthony Kennedy asked 
>>>> <http://www.texastribune.org/2012/07/23/cruz-supreme-court-work-heart-campaign/>.
>>>>  
>>>> The court system did finally let Haley out of prison, after six years.
>>>> Continue reading the main story 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=2#story-continues-3>RELATED
>>>>  
>>>> IN OPINION <http://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/campaign-stops>
>>>>    
>>>>    - 
>>>>    Contributing Op-Ed Writer: Willie Horton’s Heirs 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/campaign-stops/ads-from-donald-trump-and-ted-cruz-play-to-racist-fears.html>
>>>>
>>>> The case reveals something interesting about Cruz’s character. Ted Cruz 
>>>> is now running strongly among evangelical voters, especially in Iowa. But 
>>>> in his career and public presentation Cruz is a stranger to most of what 
>>>> would generally be considered the Christian virtues: humility, mercy, 
>>>> compassion and grace. Cruz’s behavior in the Haley case is almost the 
>>>> dictionary definition of pharisaism: an overzealous application of the 
>>>> letter of the law in a way that violates the spirit of the law, as well as 
>>>> fairness and mercy.
>>>>
>>>> Traditionally, candidates who have attracted strong evangelical support 
>>>> have in part emphasized the need to lend a helping hand to the 
>>>> economically 
>>>> stressed and the least fortunate among us. Such candidates include George 
>>>> W. Bush, Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum.
>>>> Continue reading the main story 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=2#story-continues-4>RELATED
>>>>  
>>>> COVERAGE
>>>>    
>>>>    - [image: Senator Ted Cruz of Texas spoke in Storm Lake, Iowa, on 
>>>>    Wednesday.]
>>>>    One Town at a Time in Iowa, With Ted Cruz 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/09/us/politics/ted-cruz-iowa-bus-tour.html>
>>>>    - [image: Senator Ted Cruz of Texas with Bob Vander Plaats, one of 
>>>>    the most influential leaders of Iowa’s politically activist 
>>>>    evangelicals, in Rock Rapids last week.]
>>>>    Ted Cruz’s Diligent Courting of Evangelicals Pays Off in Iowa 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/11/us/politics/ted-cruz-rises-in-iowa-on-tide-of-evangelical-support.html>
>>>>    - [image: Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, far right, highlighted his 
>>>>    background — the son of a bartender and a maid — during the Kemp Forum 
>>>> in 
>>>>    Columbia, S.C., on Saturday. Mr. Rubio also noted that Gov. John Kasich 
>>>> of 
>>>>    Ohio, sitting next to him, understood the challenges of struggling 
>>>>    Americans, with a father who delivered mail.]
>>>>    Republican Candidates, Minus Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, Play Nice 
>>>>    at Poverty Forum 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/10/us/politics/republican-candidates-minus-donald-trump-and-ted-cruz-play-nice-at-poverty-forum.html>
>>>>
>>>> But Cruz’s speeches are marked by what you might call pagan brutalism. 
>>>> There is not a hint of compassion, gentleness and mercy. Instead, his 
>>>> speeches are marked by a long list of enemies, and vows to crush, shred, 
>>>> destroy, bomb them. When he is speaking in a church the contrast between 
>>>> the setting and the emotional tone he sets is jarring.
>>>>
>>>> Cruz lays down an atmosphere of apocalyptic fear. America is heading 
>>>> off “the cliff to oblivion 
>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/10/11/ted-cruz-faces-hecklers/>.”
>>>>  
>>>> After one Democratic debate he said 
>>>> <https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/10/15/cruz-hits-lowpoint-republican-rhetoric/tKHqXCpiWg65Yf64LmHohP/story.html>,
>>>>  
>>>> “We’re seeing our freedoms taken away every day, and last night was an 
>>>> audition for who would wear the jackboot most vigorously.”
>>>> David Brooks <http://www.nytimes.com/column/david-brooks>Politics, 
>>>> culture and the social sciences.
>>>>
>>>>    - The Self-Reliant Generation 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/08/opinion/the-self-reliant-generation.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2FDavid%20Brooks>
>>>>    - The Age of Small Terror 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/05/opinion/the-age-of-small-terror.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2FDavid%20Brooks>
>>>>    - The 2015 Sidney Awards, Part 2 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/22/opinion/the-2015-sidney-awards-part-2.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2FDavid%20Brooks>
>>>>    - The 2015 Sidney Awards 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/18/opinion/the-2015-sidney-awards.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2FDavid%20Brooks>
>>>>    - The Year of Unearthed Memories 
>>>>    
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/15/opinion/the-year-of-unearthed-memories.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2FDavid%20Brooks>
>>>>
>>>> See More » <http://www.nytimes.com/column/david-brooks>
>>>>
>>>> As the Republican strategist Curt Anderson observed 
>>>> <http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/12/ted-cruz-2016-ego-213460> 
>>>> in 
>>>> Politico, there’s no variation in Cruz’s rhetorical tone. As is the wont 
>>>> of 
>>>> inauthentic speakers, everything is described as a maximum existential 
>>>> threat.
>>>>
>>>> The fact is this apocalyptic diagnosis is ridiculous. The Obama 
>>>> administration has done things people like me strongly disagree with. But 
>>>> America is in better economic shape than any other major nation on earth. 
>>>> Crime is down. Abortion rates are down. Fourteen million new jobs have 
>>>> been 
>>>> created in five years.
>>>>
>>>> Obama has championed a liberal agenda, but he hasn’t made the country 
>>>> unrecognizable. In 2008, federal spending accounted for about 20.3 percent 
>>>> of gross domestic product. In 2015, it accounted for about 20.9 percent.
>>>>
>>>> But Cruz manufactures an atmosphere of menace in which there is no room 
>>>> for compassion, for moderation, for anything but dismantling and 
>>>> counterattack. And that is what he offers. Cruz’s programmatic agenda, to 
>>>> the extent that it exists in his speeches, is to destroy things: destroy 
>>>> the I.R.S., crush the “jackals” of the E.P.A., end funding for Planned 
>>>> Parenthood, reverse Obama’s executive orders, make the desert glow in 
>>>> Syria, destroy the Iran nuclear accord.
>>>>
>>>> Advertisement
>>>> Continue reading the main story 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=2#story-continues-7>
>>>>
>>>> Advertisement
>>>> Continue reading the main story 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=2#story-continues-7>
>>>>
>>>> Some of these positions I agree with, but the lack of any positive 
>>>> emphasis, any hint of reform conservatism, any aid for the working class, 
>>>> or even any humane gesture toward cooperation is striking.
>>>>
>>>> Ted Cruz didn’t come up with this hard, combative and gladiatorial 
>>>> campaign approach in isolation. He’s always demonstrated a tendency to 
>>>> bend 
>>>> his position — whether immigration or trade — to what suits him 
>>>> politically. This approach works because in the wake of the Obergefell v. 
>>>> Hodges court decision on same-sex marriage, many evangelicals feel they 
>>>> are 
>>>> being turned into pariahs in their own nation.
>>>> Continue reading the main story 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=2#story-continues-9>
>>>> Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
>>>>
>>>> Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, 
>>>> The Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.
>>>>
>>>> Cruz exploits and exaggerates that fear. But he reacts to Obergefell in 
>>>> exactly the alienating and combative manner that is destined to further 
>>>> marginalize evangelicals, that is guaranteed to bring out fear-driven 
>>>> reactions and not the movement’s highest ideals.
>>>>
>>>> The best conservatism balances support for free markets with a 
>>>> Judeo-Christian spirit of charity, compassion and solidarity. Cruz 
>>>> replaces 
>>>> this spirit with Spartan belligerence. He sows bitterness, influences his 
>>>> followers to lose all sense of proportion and teaches them to answer hate 
>>>> with hate. This Trump-Cruz conservatism looks more like tribal, blood and 
>>>> soil European conservatism than the pluralistic American kind.
>>>>
>>>> Evangelicals and other conservatives have had their best influence on 
>>>> American politics when they have proceeded in a spirit of personalism — 
>>>> when they have answered hostility with service and emphasized the infinite 
>>>> dignity of each person. They have won elections as happy and hopeful 
>>>> warriors. Ted Cruz’s brutal, fear-driven, apocalypse-based approach is the 
>>>> antithesis of that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Follow The New York Times Opinion section onFacebook 
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion> and Twitter 
>>>> <http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion>, and sign up for the Opinion Today 
>>>> newsletter <http://www.nytimes.com/newsletters/opiniontoday/>. *
>>>>
>>>> A version of this op-ed appears in print on January 12, 2016, on page 
>>>> A27 of the New York edition with the headline: The Brutalism of Ted 
>>>> Cruz. Today's Paper 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/pages/todayspaper/index.html>|Subscribe 
>>>> <http://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp839RF.html?campaignId=48JQY>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>  
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to