http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/returning_power_to_the_people.html



January 16, 2016
Returning Power to the People

By Tom Trinko <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/tom_trinko/>

The great American experiment is based on the revolutionary idea that power
flows from the people not the government; the rights of people granted by
the Creator, not the Divine right of kings.

Lincoln encapsulated that when he said:

…government of the people, by the people, for the people…

The Constitution defines a government where the people exercise power by
electing -- and getting rid of -- politicians. Because in the vision
created by the Framers, laws can only be created by the people’s
representatives, Congress, the people control, albeit indirectly, what laws
are passed.

This makes sense, since the people are the ones who have to deal with the
consequences of any law passed by Congress. If people have no control over
those who pass laws, then there is tyranny; a group of elites who can
command the people and who the people cannot remove.

The sad reality is that America is no longer a country run by a government
of the people. Decades of fascist maneuvering by Democrats has destroyed
the representational nature of American government and disenfranchised the
people.

The elimination of people power began with the Supreme Court’s acceptance
of the idea of the “living” Constitution; i.e., the idea that the
Constitution means whatever 5 judges thinks it means rather than what the
people who wrote and ratified the Constitution thought it meant.

Irrespective of how one feels about reading a criminal their rights, it’s
absurd on the face of it to believe that the Founders felt that Mirandizing
criminals was a Constitutional necessity, given that no one had broached
the subject in the first 100+ years after the Constitution was ratified.

Similarly, one can be for abortion yet admit that nowhere in the
Constitution is there any “right to privacy” nor did the Framers think that
the Constitution would legalize a practice they abhorred. Instead, the
Court imposed on America its personal morality. A court that decides what
it thinks the Constitution should mean is no different in nature than a
monarch such as King George III; the Court overriding the laws of all 50
states and legalizing abortion for any reason at any point in a pregnancy
is of the same nature as King George III unilaterally demanding that
Americans house British soldiers in their homes.

Recently the Court has solidified its power by declaring that citizens
don’t have the right
<http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/06/supreme-court-prop-8-ruling-problem>
to sue when politicians don’t enforce the laws passed by the people
directly. Seven million Californians passed Prop 8 that declared that
marriage was between a man and a woman. The fascist Democrat politicians of
California, including Jerry Brown, refused to defend the people’s law
showing that Democrats do not believe that power flows from the people. But
if the people don’t have standing to demand that the laws they pass be
enforced clearly the people, in the eyes of the Supreme Court, have no
power.

Similarly, Eric Holder and Obama declared themselves above the law by refusing
to enforce DOMA
<http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/holder-invites-state-ags-do-he-did-refuse-defend-laws-banning-same-sex>
-- and encouraging state attorneys-general to do the same. Clearly, if
politicians can pick and choose which laws to follow, the people have no
power, since even if they manage to get laws enacted, the people have no
assurance that their “rulers” will follow those laws.

Of course, Obama’s imperial presidency and his refusal to act as though
there are any Constitutional restraints on his personal power also work to
remove the people from the decision-making process. However, rather than
using his pen, Obama usually relies on the hoards of overpaid government
workers to enforce his will on the people.

The final step in disenfranchising the American people and making them
subjects of a new royal class composed of government bureaucrats, judges,
and politicians has been the rise of what’s called administrative law;
rules created by unelected government workers that Americans must follow.

In America today, if Democrats think that men accused of rape on college
campuses should be denied due process they need not pass a law, rather they
only need an unelected and essentially unfireable government
bureaucrat to write
a letter
<http://www.wsj.com/articles/in-campus-rape-tribunals-some-men-see-injustice-1428684187>
to colleges threatening to remove all federal funding unless men’s due
process is removed.

Similarly if Democrats wish to crush the poor with massive increases in
their energy bills they need not pass a law. Instead they just have
the EPA issue
a mandate
<http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/11/not-even-democrats-believe-epa-on-viability-of-clean-coal-tech/>
that essentially outlaws coal burning power plants that will dramatically
increase energy costs; a highly regressive “tax” since the poor spend
<http://fee.org/freeman/the-poor-need-affordable-energy/> a much higher
percentage of their money on energy than do the rich and middle class.

The elimination of people power helps explains why the Democrat agenda
advances despite electoral wins by Republicans. While many Republicans are
in fact more interested in the donor class than the people, the reality is
that under the government described by the Constitution, Democrats could
not just stonewall. To advance their agenda Democrats would have to
compromise. We saw that during the Reagan administration, where the
Democrats had to go along with key parts of Reagan’s agenda in order to
further their own objectives.

Today the Court and unelected bureaucrats can further the Democrat agenda
without Congress doing anything. Hence Democrats have no need to compromise.

Gridlock is the result not of partisanship but of the institutionalization
of Democrat power through the Courts and administrative law -- and of
course Obama’s executive orders. Because Democrats can get what they want
without Congress passing laws, Democrats need not compromise and they know
that the MSM will blame Republicans for Congress’s lack of action.

Tip O’Neill had to work with Reagan in order to get what he wanted; Pelosi
and Reid don’t have to work with Ryan or McConnell to get what they want.

If anyone doubts that Americans are now controlled by their masters in
government, they only need look at the fact that not only do government
workers have job security, something the people don’t have in the Obama
economy, but that they earn 78% more
<http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/federal-worker-pay>, on average, than
the people. Liberals claim that that’s because government jobs require more
skills than private sector jobs. That claim shows just how elitist liberals
are -- they actually believe that being a government paper pusher is more
demanding than being a plumber, a software engineer, or the owner of a
small business.

In the Soviet Union, the *nomenklatura*, the ruling class, was marked by
its special privileges and its higher pay, just like government employees
and politicians in America today. Following the money tells us who are the
rulers and who are the ruled in America today.

To turn this around we need to eliminate the ability of unelected
government workers to make law and we need to reign in the Supreme Court.

It’s time for conservatives to demand power for the people and a return to
what should be all American’s rightful inheritance; a government for, by,
and of the people.


Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/returning_power_to_the_people.html#ixzz3xREja68g


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNmJzMmFvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTI5NzM0NjI->

   - New Members
   
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnbmh0NDJxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDUyOTczNDYy>
   1

[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZ2ZiNzQxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1Mjk3MzQ2Mg-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to