Just another way of getting around standing and jurisdiction.....
---
just another way the police commit robbery.

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 2:27:05 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> I am quite familiar with these *in rem* and *quasi in rem* 
> seizures.....It's Admiralty Law, and it should be unconstitutional.....(In 
> rem forfeitures are morally, ethically, and in my opinon legally!)  wrong!
>
> Just another way of getting around standing and jurisdiction.....
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> they are thieves.
>>
>> Highway Robbery: Tennessee Police Are Seizing Cash ... 
>> <http://jonathanturley.org/2012/05/24/highway-robbery-tennessee-police-are-seizing-cash-from-out-of-state-visitors-in-policy-called-policing-for-profit/>
>> jonathanturley.org/.../highway-robbery-*tennessee*-police-are-seizing-
>> *cash*...
>> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#>
>>
>>    - 
>>    
>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2DC0fDJ6dO4J:jonathanturley.org/2012/05/24/highway-robbery-tennessee-police-are-seizing-cash-from-out-of-state-visitors-in-policy-called-policing-for-profit/+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
>>    - 
>>    
>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:jonathanturley.org/2012/05/24/highway-robbery-tennessee-police-are-seizing-cash-from-out-of-state-visitors-in-policy-called-policing-for-profit/+TN+I-40+cash+confiscation&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiqqafPlL7KAhVY2WMKHSjBAIQQHwguMAI>
>>
>> May 24, 2012 - It appears that anyone visiting Tennessee this summer 
>> should leave their cash at home. ... The officer demanded the money and 
>> said that he wasconfiscating the money on suspicion of drug ... 1, May 
>> 24, 2012 at 8:40 am.
>> Don't drive on Tennessee I-40 unless you want to be accused 
>> <http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/02/16/dont-drive-on-tennessees-i-40-unless-you-want-to-be-accused-of-drug-trafficking-video/>
>> www.addictinginfo.org/.../dont-drive-on-*tennessee*s-i-*40*
>> -unless-you-wan...
>> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#>
>>
>>    - 
>>    
>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:t6P1nYX0SxkJ:www.addictinginfo.org/2013/02/16/dont-drive-on-tennessees-i-40-unless-you-want-to-be-accused-of-drug-trafficking-video/+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
>>    - 
>>    
>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=643&q=related:www.addictinginfo.org/2013/02/16/dont-drive-on-tennessees-i-40-unless-you-want-to-be-accused-of-drug-trafficking-video/+TN+I-40+cash+confiscation&tbo=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiqqafPlL7KAhVY2WMKHSjBAIQQHwg1MAM>
>>
>> Feb 16, 2013 - For some police agencies in Tennessee, the drug war gives 
>> cops a reason to legally steal from innocent drivers under the pretense 
>> that cash or ...
>> Tennessee Law Enforcement Commiting Highway Robbery ... 
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO_UWxkMsrk>
>> [image: Video for TN I-40 cash confiscation]▶ 7:20 
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO_UWxkMsrk>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tO_UWxkMsrk
>> May 18, 2011 - Uploaded by NaziPolice
>> "What's wrong with having a large amount of cash? ... In fact,Interstate 
>> 40 has become a major profit ...
>>
>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 11:45:19 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> http://dailysignal.com/2016/01/21/how-the-tsa-and-drug-enforcement-administration-joined-forces-to-seize-cash-at-airports/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=morningbell&mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRovvajLZKXonjHpfsX56uUoW6%2B2lMI%2F0ER3fOvrPUfGjI4ASMRkMa%2BTFAwTG5toziV8R7jHKM1t0sEQWBHm
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> How the TSA and Drug Enforcement Administration Joined Forces to Seize 
>>> Cash at Airports
>>>
>>> Melissa Quinn / January 21, 2016
>>>
>>> A new report from a government watchdog criticized the Drug Enforcement 
>>> Administration for working with a Transportation Security Administration 
>>> security screener to flag bags containing large sums of cash, which the 
>>> drug agency could then take.
>>>
>>> According <https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2016/f160107b.pdf> to the 
>>> investigation from the Department of Justice’s Inspector General released 
>>> earlier this month, the TSA agent was registered with the DEA as a paid 
>>> confidential source.  
>>>
>>> The inspector general’s report said that the TSA security screener 
>>> working with the DEA to identify luggage with large sums of cash was 
>>> promised a reward based on the amount of money seized.
>>>
>>> Though the TSA agent in question never provided the drug agency with any 
>>> information, the screener “could have violated individuals’ protection 
>>> against unreasonable searches and seizures if it led to a subsequent DEA 
>>> enforcement action,” the government watchdog warned.
>>>
>>> For experts on civil asset forfeiture, the findings from the inspector 
>>> general underscore the “powerful” incentives law enforcement agents have to 
>>> seize property and cash from people under civil forfeiture laws, even if 
>>> they don’t charge them with a crime.
>>>
>>> Those who back the laws, which includes many law enforcement agents and 
>>> prosecutors, say civil forfeiture helps curb money laundering and drug 
>>> trafficking.
>>>
>>> “[The DEA is] putting a bounty on tips that lead to cash seizures, and 
>>> that incentivizes, in this case, the TSA’s confidential information to do 
>>> just that—to search any and all bags to get the cash they’re looking for to 
>>> get the tip, and get paid,” Jason Snead, a policy analyst at The Heritage 
>>> Foundation who studies civil forfeiture, told The Daily Signal. He 
>>> continued:
>>>
>>> *There’s this area of [civil forfeiture] where you have these reduced 
>>> protections against search and seizures that are being taken advantage of 
>>> by the DEA.*
>>>
>>> Under little-known civil asset forfeiture laws, law enforcement agencies 
>>> like the DEA have the power to seize cash and property if agents suspect 
>>> it’s connected to a crime. Over the last year, numerous cases have arisen 
>>> involving innocent Americans who had their property seized by the drug 
>>> agency at transportation hubs.
>>>
>>> In May, for example, DEA agents seized 
>>> <http://dailysignal.com/2015/06/09/after-dea-takes-life-savings-22-year-old-fights-for-justice/>
>>>  
>>> $16,000 from 22-year-old Joseph Rivers at a train stop in Albuquerque, N.M.
>>>
>>> Rivers was traveling on Amtrak from Michigan to Los Angeles, where he 
>>> had plans to pursue a career as a music producer. The $16,000, he told The 
>>> Daily Signal in June, was the culmination of years of savings and money 
>>> from his mother and other family members.
>>>
>>> Similarly, DEA agents took 
>>> <http://www.abqjournal.com/580107/news/dea-agents-seize-16000-from-aspiring-music-video-producer.html>
>>>  
>>> $11,000 in cash from 24-year-old Charles Clarke at the Cincinnati/Northern 
>>> Kentucky International Airport in June.
>>>
>>> State and federal law enforcement seized the money before Clarke boarded 
>>> a plane bound for Florida and alleged it was tied to drugs. However, Clarke 
>>> told The Daily Signal at the time that the money was the result of five 
>>> years worth of saving from various jobs, financial aid, gifts from family 
>>> members and benefits his mother received.
>>>
>>> Clarke is still fighting the government in court to get his money back.
>>>
>>> In both cases, neither Rivers nor Clarke were charged with crimes. The 
>>> DEA, in affidavits filed relating to the two cases, said their money was 
>>> seized because the drug agency believed the cash was tied to drugs.
>>>
>>> Transportation facilities appear to be an area of focus for the DEA, and 
>>> specifically its task force groups, which work to stop drug trafficking at 
>>> transportation hubs using “cold consent encounters.”
>>>
>>> Cold consent encounters occur either when an agent approaches an 
>>> individual randomly or an agent approaches an individual when he or she 
>>> believes the person is exhibiting behavior indicative of drug trafficking, 
>>> the inspector general said.
>>>
>>> Focusing on transportation hubs, Snead said, is purely a “numbers game.”
>>>
>>> “They have a concentrated area with lots of people going back and forth, 
>>> and there’s just simply more opportunities per square mile to seize cash 
>>> than anywhere else. In fact, one of the things we’ve seen in the roadside 
>>> seizures or in the case of Joseph Rivers, one of the motivating factors for 
>>> that is the fact that he was traveling to a known drug hot spot, which is 
>>> any city in the U.S.,” Snead said. He continued:
>>>
>>> *If you’re at an airport and the flight happens to be going to Los 
>>> Angeles or Miami, then right off the bat you’ve got the extenuating factor 
>>> that they can put down in their official report.*
>>>
>>> From 2009 to 2013, the DEA seized $163 million from 4,138 cash seizures, 
>>> according <https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2015/e153.pdf#page=1> to a 
>>> January 2015 report from the Justice Department Inspector General.
>>>
>>> Of those cash seizures, 21 percent were contested, and in 41 percent of 
>>> those contested cases, all or part of the seized money was returned, 
>>> totaling $8.3 million, the Justice Department Inspector General found.
>>>
>>> “People carry significant amounts of cash for innocent reasons and the 
>>> laws are such that it’s easy to seize cash on the pretense it’s drug 
>>> money,” Snead said. “There’s an allure that you can’t say no to.”
>>>
>>> Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies have faced mounting 
>>> criticism because of their use of civil forfeiture to seize cash and 
>>> property.
>>>
>>> Those deciding to fight the government for their seized property must 
>>> appear in court—often multiple times—to prove they either didn’t consent to 
>>> the criminal activity or the property wasn’t connected to criminal 
>>> activity, a notion that experts say flips the presumption of innocence on 
>>> its head.
>>>
>>> At the heart of the argument made by civil forfeiture opponents 
>>> surrounding why civil forfeiture laws should be reformed, or abolished 
>>> completely for some, lies what experts say is a perverse profit incentive 
>>> the tool creates.
>>>
>>> In many states and at the federal level, law enforcement agencies can 
>>> keep up to 100 percent of the proceeds from civil forfeiture, a figure that 
>>> gives agencies a financial incentive to seize cash and property.
>>>
>>> This profit incentive, Snead said, speaks to why the DEA was willing to 
>>> work with a TSA security screening agents to notify them of cash seizures.
>>>
>>> “As the [inspector general] report noted, paying an official of the U.S. 
>>> government to do this service violated the DEA’s own internal policy, and I 
>>> think that alone speaks to the powerful incentives inherent to forfeiture,” 
>>> Snead said. “It’s so powerful that DEA officers are willing at the very 
>>> least to skirt the line, if not completely violate their own internal 
>>> policies to secure cash forfeitures.”
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> __._,_.___
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Visit Your Group 
>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMzQ2MWxwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTM0ODM4ODM->
>>>  
>>>    
>>>    
>>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
>>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMHFncWF1BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MzQ4Mzg4NA-->
>>>  
>>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> 
>>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
>>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>>>
>>> __,_._,___
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to