Just wondering if we would do the same thing if a Russian spy plane was
close to the US gathering intelligence!!! Spying is still seen as an
aggressive act by the person spying!!!

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *While everyone OBSESSES over Trump, look what Russia just did to a U.S.
> jet…*
>
> Written by Michelle Jesse, Associate Editor
> <http://www.allenbwest.com/author/michellejesse/> on January 28, 2016
>
> [image: Putin evil]
>
> GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump is, once again, dominating the
> news cycles. But it’s not about some controversial comment (e.g., re:
> illegal immigrants from Mexico) or policy (e.g., banning Muslims) about an
> issue that impacts our nation.
>
> Nope, it’s about a personal feud between the candidate and Fox News and
> anchorwoman Megyn Kelly. And while we’re all in a frenzy about what shot
> will be fired next by one side or another — or from the sidelines, as it
> were — or what new stunt Trump might pull, and who might join him, the rest
> of the world continues on.
>
> And we are reminded of the gravity of the issues we face by what Russia
> just did. As the Washington Free Beacon
> <http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russian-fighter-conducts-dangerous-intercept-of-u-s-recon-jet/>
>  reports,
> a Russian fighter just conducted a dangerous intercept of U.S. recon jet.
>
> *A Russian Su-27 jet fighter came within 20 feet of a U.S. RC-135
> reconnaissance aircraft over the Black Sea on Monday in Moscow’s latest
> military provocation involving dangerous aerial encounters.*
>
> *“On Jan. 25 an RC-135 aircraft flying a routine route in international
> airspace over the Black Sea was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 in an unsafe
> and unprofessional manner,” Navy Capt. Daniel Hernandez, chief spokesman
> for the U.S. European Command, told the Washington Free Beacon. “We are
> looking into the issue.”*
>
> *Defense officials said the Su-27 flew alongside the RC-135, an electronic
> intelligence-gathering aircraft, and then performed what they said was an
> aggressive banking turn away from the intelligence jet.*
>
> *The thrust from the Su-27 “disturbed the controllability” of the RC-135,
> said one official familiar with details of the incident.*
>
> *A second official said the reconnaissance aircraft was flying 30 miles
> from the coast—well within international airspace and far away from any
> Russian territory—at the time of the encounter.*
>
> *The Pentagon announced Thursday that it has concluded a flight safety
> memorandum with Russia after holding a video conference with Russian
> Defense Ministry officials.*
>
> *The areas of discussion included air safety over the skies in Syria as
> well as “the means to avoid accidents and unintended confrontation between
> coalition and Russian forces whenever the two sides operate in close
> proximity,” Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said in a statement.*
>
> *The statement made no mention of Monday’s dangerous aerial encounter.*
>
> *The Black Sea encounter was the latest in a series of aggressive Russian
> military activities aimed coercing or harassing U.S. military aircraft and
> ships in both Europe and Asia.*
>
> *The provocations are not limited to U.S. forces. On Tuesday, Japan’s
> Defense Ministry revealed that Japanese interceptor jets were scrambled to
> chase two Russian Tu-95 Bear bombers that approached the northern end of
> Japan and flew just outside that country’s airspace in maneuvers described
> by analysts as unusually close.*
>
> The WFB recounts several other similar incidents involving Russian
> fighters during the past several months.
>
> *“Much of what Russia is doing today is aimed at generating fear of
> Russian military power and the possibility of war,” said former Pentagon
> Russia expert Mark Schneider.*
>
> *“That is broadcast on a daily basis in the state media and through
> Russian military actions,” Schneider added. “Provocations involving
> aircraft are now common place. Russia also tends to be paranoid concerning
> foreign espionage and the protection of state secrets.”*
>
> *Adm. Cecil Haney, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command said Russian
> military activities, including aircraft flights, are an increasing concern
> as Moscow seeks to reemerge as a world power.*
>
> *Haney voiced concerns about Russian nuclear-capable bomber flights around
> the world, and large-scale ground forces nuclear exercises, along with
> vocal statements threatening the use of nuclear weapons.*
>
> *Russian military aircraft have been conducting flights in Europe without
> the use of air-traffic control tracking transponders, a practice Haney
> called “reckless.”*
>
> *Russia has stepped up aggressive military activities in response to
> NATO’s deployment of forces closer to Russian borders following Moscow’s
> military annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea and continuing covert military
> destabilization of eastern Ukraine.*
>
> *Russia announced a new military strategy in December that increases the
> country’s reliance on nuclear forces over conventional troops and weapons.*
>
> *Russia also is expected to announce a new military doctrine, a senior
> Russian commander announced on Tuesday.*
>
> *Maj. Gen. Sergey Chvarkov, deputy chief of the general staff academy said
> the United States is seeking to weaken Russia and is creating new national
> security threats to Moscow.*
>
> What was it again that President Obama said in the 2012 debate with GOP
> candidate Mitt Romney about the 1980s calling and wanting its foreign
> policy back? We made the wrong choice in leadership back then, and it’s
> costing us now. Does anyone feel safer than they did seven years ago?
>
> Russia’s latest action is just a stark reminder — among oh so many — of
> the critical importance of this year’s presidential elections. Our Democrat
> counterparts are, naturally, all whipped up over diversity in Hollywood
> movie awards; fueling envy and division among Americans; and promising free
> college tuition, rainbows and unicorns.
>
> But how much better are we on the GOP side doing really? Who is this
> latest media circus serving? I’m pretty sure it’s not the American people
> and the future of our great republic. And probably not our own party,
> either.
>
> This is not about pointing fingers or blame at a particular candidate or
> institution (that in and of itself is another sideshow I’ll leave to
> others); it’s intended simply to remind us of what should be important to
> all of us — no matter who we support individually in the GOP primaries.
>
> I firmly believe we, as conservatives, CAN WIN this election IF we focus
> on the REAL issues facing our nation. But we must focus on them and stop
> letting these sideshows distract us from the substance. We must. We have
> the higher ground… if we choose to take it.
>
>
> __._,_.___
> ------------------------------
> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Visit Your Group
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYnY1MmVtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTQwMjkyNjI->
>
>
> [image: Yahoo! Groups]
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcHR2YzFlBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NDAyOTI2Mg-->
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
> Unsubscribe
> <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms
> of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to