On January 26, 2016, the FBI shot and killed rancher LaVoy Finicum <http://cdn3.freedomoutpost.com/?s=lavoy+finicum> --- they should have stunned him instead ... though the killing was justified. dumbass fucking cowboys think they can take over a federal facility and dare law enforcement to intervene? they obviously have learned nothing from the past.
On Monday, February 22, 2016 at 10:39:04 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > David Risselada <http://cdn3.freedomoutpost.com/author/davidrisselada/> > February > 20, 2016 > <http://cdn3.freedomoutpost.com/2016/02/cointelpro-false-flags-and-a-patriot-down/> > > > *COINTELPRO, False Flags, and a Patriot Down * > > On January 26, 2016, the FBI shot and killed rancher LaVoy Finicum > <http://cdn3.freedomoutpost.com/?s=lavoy+finicum>in what appeared to be a > deliberate setup. This brought the 25 day stand off between federal agents > and militia members protesting for restored property rights to an end. > Controversy surrounds the shooting, as it appears that LaVoy may have > reached for something around his waistband after appearing to take a > bullet; however, there is no sound in the video released by the FBI > <http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/01/fbi_to_release_video_footage_o.html> > so > no definite conclusions can be made. LaVoy Finicum, along with other > militia members are portrayed as terrorists by the main stream media and > were treated accordingly by federal law enforcement officers. > > Since the beginning of the Obama administration there has been an all out > effort to label anyone of a right-leaning ideology as a potential > extremist. In the report published in 2009 entitled “Rightwing > Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in > Radicalization and Recruitment <http://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf>,” > references are made to economic hardships, proposed weapon bans, and the > election of the first African-American president as things that may > ecourage rightwing violence. The report also expresses concern that radical > right wing groups may attempt to recruit returning war veterans who may be > disgruntled with the government. The following paragraphs are from this > report. > > *Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first > African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new > members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal > through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.* > > *The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the > 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by > an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the > perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers. * > > *During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the number of > domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in > violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, > banks, and infrastructure sectors. * > > *The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of > military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their > communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or > lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.* > > *Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into > those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented > (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and > those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor > of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It > may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, > such as opposition to abortion or immigration. * > > *Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely > would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as > well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for > violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and > stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in > anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue > to be a primary concern to law enforcement. * > > *Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are > attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS is concerned that rightwing > extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in > order to boost their violent capabilities.* > > Reading this report, one is left with the impression that the government > is deliberately planning to label people as terrorists because they know > there is going to be a great deal of resistance to their agenda. This is an > agenda that has transformed our nation from freedom and prosperity to > socialism and desperation, and labeling dissenters as terrorists is a > convinient way to ensure no one stands in the way; and if they do, law > enforcement has been trained to deal with them. For instance, in 2013, the > FBI had begun target practice on targets depicting everyday American > citizens > <http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/02/20/no-more-hesitation-homeland-security-and-police-dept-request-targets-for-shooting-practice-to-help-desensitize-law-enforcement-to-shooting-average-americans/> > brandishing > firearms, this included pregnant women and children > <http://cdn3.freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/dhs-supplier-sells-targets-of-american-gun-owners/>. > > The name of the program was “No More Hesitation” and was designed to > condition law enforcement personnel to shoot first and ask questions later. > Comparing the targets with the quotes from the DHS report gives the > impression that there will, at some point, be door to door gun > confiscation. Another point to consider is the fact that the FBI, and other > law enforcement agencies, have removed all references of Islamic extremism > <http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/21/obama-administration-pulls-references-to-islam-from-terror-training-materials-official-says/> > from > their training manuals, filling the void with information similar to the > DHS report. This means that all new FBI recruits are being indoctrinated > into the belief that conservatives and Constitutionalists are threats to > national security. This explains why law enforcement officers are so quick > to pull the trigger. > > The FBI has a long history of infiltrating and discrediting organizations > considered to be a threat to government power. It is a program called > COINTELPRO <http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Cointelpro> > (Counter > Intelligence Program) and it dates back to the 1950’s. The program was used > to infiltrate groups like the Communist Party U.S.A., Black Panthers, the > Klu Klux Klan, and other organizations percieved to be a threat. Under the > standing law of the time, “The Communist Control Act of 1954,” > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Control_Act_of_1954> FBI > director J. Edgar Hoover used the program to spy on communists. The idea > was to infiltrate targeted groups with the purpose of discrediting them and > causing internal strife in order to weaken their political influence. In > the 1990’s, the U.S. government turned its focus to patriot groups, gun > owners and others who professed to be “Constitutionalists.” This was due to > the fact that the government feared an angry populace after outsourcing > jobs and surrendering U.S. sovereignty to international interests. In 1996, > at the height of the militia movement, motivated by the government’s > excessive use of force at Waco > <http://opdocumentaryfilms.com/waco-a-new-revelation/>and Ruby Ridge > <http://mkultra-cia.blogspot.com/2009/02/ruby-ridge-story.html>, the FBI > unlawfully infiltrated the Georgia Militia and planted explosives devises > on their property. Robert Edward Star and William James McCranie > <http://www.alternet.org/story/142123/terror_from_the_right%3A_75_plots,_conspiracies_and_racist_rampages_since_oklahoma_city> > were > charged with manufacturing, with the intent to distribute “shrapnel packed” > pipe bombs. This was later proven to be a deliberate set up, as explained > in the radio broadcast of William Cooper's “The Hour of the Time” below. > The idea was to portray the Constitutional Militia > <http://www.fortruthssake.com/2014/08/constitutional-militia-purpose-second-amendment/> > as > a group of radicals seeking to overthrow the government. > > > > In the Oregon standoff, COINTELPRO was in play as FBI agents infiltrated > the militia group > <http://rightwingnews.com/freedom/fbi-agents-provocateurs-infiltrate-oregon-protesters/> > and > deliberately harrassed members of the community. They even went as far as > snooping around the local armory to give the impression they intended to > break in. This would have turned public opinion against militia members > while encouraging citizens to demand government intervention. This resulted > in the resignation of Harney County Fire Marshall Chris Briels. Briels > personally caught the agents snooping around the armory and was told to > back off after bringing it to the attention of Judge Steve Grasty. > > The U.S. government also has a habit of creating its own crisis in order > to justify military action. Operation Northwoods > <http://911review.com/precedent/century/northwoods.html>, for example, > was a scenario where the Joint Chiefs of staff drew up a plan to stage fake > terrorist attacks on the American public while blaming Cuba; thus, > justifying a much-desired attack against the Island nation. This is known > as the *false flag > <http://radicalconservativerisso.blogspot.com/search?q=false+flags>* attack, > and history shows that this has been used on more than one occasion to > justify America’s involvement in war. The Gulf of Tonkin and the Attack of > Pearl Harbor were both said to be false flag attacks. What many in the > militia movement fear is that there will be a deliberate attack set up by > COINTELPRO agents in order to justify police/military action against those > who stand for freedom, which would justify the need for furthering the police > state <http://cdn3.freedomoutpost.com/?s=police+state>. Is it possible > that LaVoy Finicum was deliberately led to the road block with the hopes > that he would attempt to fire on FBI agents, thus justifying the further > encroachment of our constitutional rights? Given the information presented > in this article, it is a possibilty that should not be discounted. > > It is the patriot movement that stands in the way of the Obama agenda. > Slowly but surely, we are watching the narrative of terrorism move from the > threat of Islamic Radicalism to “right wing” radicalism. Fear and > misinformation are being used to give the impression that the nation is > filled with anti-governemnt extremists who are wanting to go war with the > federal government. At the same time, any education concerning the > principles behind the constitution has been scrubbed away from the public > school system, just the same as the brutal history of excessive > government control has. <https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM> The > government must be held to account for their subversive tactics and their > deliberate attempt to discredit a movement that is only standing for the > rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution before history repeats itself. > > The Obama administration knew there was going to be pushback against his > agenda, which is why they immediately began labeling patriots as > extremists, in order to discredit and silence them. > > To learn about the left wing indoctrination taking place in our > universities, read my book *Not on My Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda > in Education* <https://www.createspace.com/5495977> > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmaDBhaDI2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTYxNTUyMTY-> > > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZG81dGFzBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NjE1NTIxNw--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
