Good Morning Bill! Interesting article, and the first time I've seen such a breakdown. This explains a lot, and supports many of my criticisms!.
Thanks for sharing this! On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Hot4azintop via PoliticalForum < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is really interesting info!! > > California > New Mexico > Mississippi > Alabama > Illinois > Kentucky > Ohio > New York > Maine > South Carolina > > These 10 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed! > Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, > between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other > benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received > $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with that much > support? Well, the median household income in America is just over > $50,000,which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it another way, being > on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for a 40-hour week, > while the average job pays $20.00 an hour. > Furthermore: > There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but > the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot. A recent > "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics > from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization. > Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after > diagnosis: > U.S. 65% > England 46% > Canada 42% > Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment > within six months: > U.S. 93% > England 15% > Canada 43% > Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six > months: > U.S. 90% > England 15% > Canada 43% > Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month: > U.S. 77% > England 40% > Canada 43% > Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people: > U.S. 71 > England 14 > Canada 18 > Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in > "excellent health": > U.S. 12% > England 2% > Canada 6% > And now..for the last statistic: > National Health Insurance? > U.S. NO > England YES > Canada YES > Check the last set of statistics!! > The percentage of each past president's cabinet... Who had worked in the > private business sector...prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You > know what the private business sector is; a real-life business...not a > government job. > Here are the percentages. > T. Roosevelt.......... .... 38% > Taft.......................... 40% > Wilson ...................... 52% > Harding..................... 49% > Coolidge.................... 48% > Hoover....................... 42% > F. Roosevelt............... 50% > Truman..................... 50% > Eisenhower............... 57% > Kennedy.................... 30% > Johnson..................... 47% > Nixon......................... 53% > Ford........................... 42% > Carter........................ 32% > Reagan...................... 56% > GH Bush.................... 51% > Clinton ..................... 39% > GW Bush................... 55% > Obama.................... 8% > This helps explain the incompetence of this administration: ONLY 8% of > them ... have ever worked in private business! That's right! Only eight > percent, the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people are > trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business? How can the > president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful > economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's > never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And, > when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? > They've spent most of their time in academia, government, and/or non-profit > jobs. Or, as "community organizers." > Pass this on, because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media. > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
