http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/22620-feds-seek-mental-health-testing-of-all-children-adults?AID=7236



Wednesday, 24 February 2016
Feds Seek “Mental Health” Testing of All Children, Adults

Written by  Alex Newman
<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/itemlist/user/68-alexnewman>



WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Next time you visit your doctor, be careful how you
respond to his questions, or you may just be branded “mentally ill” and
subjected to “treatment.” That is because a panel advising the Obama
administration, in partnership with Big Psychiatry, wants to make doctors
subject all American adults and children over age 12 to screening for
alleged “mental health” disorders — particularly depression, at least to
start with. Then, anyone found to harbor any alleged mental disorder,
including children as young as eight, should undergo “therapy,” often
including powerful psychotropic medications that experts say have dubious
value but often come with well-documented and highly dangerous side effects.
<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/14655-prescription-for-murder>

Your ObamaCare plan will be forced to pay for it, whether you want it or
not, thanks to the federal government's commandeering of the
health-insurance industry under the so-called Affordable Care Act. And
eventually, younger and younger children will be in Big Brother's
crosshairs for mental and behavioral health “services,” whether parents
want it or not. School teachers, social workers, and more are all already
being enlisted in the federal government's search for supposed “mental and
behavioral health” issues
<http://thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/22530-feds-seek-home-visits-calling-parents-equal-partners>—
a list that is perpetually expanding as psychiatrists invent new
“illnesses.”
<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/11370-critics-blast-big-psychiatry-for-invented-and-redefined-mental-illnesses>The
outcry against the federal government's obsession with your mind and the
minds of America's children, though, is growing louder, as critics call the
agenda “depressing” and worry whether it is another scheme to disarm more
Americans.

The controversial “recommendations” include screening all Americans between
the ages of 12 and 18 for depression. A separate but related recommendation
seeks to have all U.S. adults checked for “mental illness,” too. And
consider that the list of “illnesses” is subjective (homosexuality was a
mental disorder a few decades ago) and is constantly expanding as
psychiatrists vote to create new ones, literally, as part of the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual — the “Bible” of psychiatry that has been widely
criticized, even by leading psychiatrists
<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/11370-critics-blast-big-psychiatry-for-invented-and-redefined-mental-illnesses>
.

The latest demands come from the United States Preventive Services Task
Force, or USPSTF. The influential outfit, appointed by the Obama
administration's increasingly radical Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), recommends various unconstitutional federal health policies
for Big Brother to decree into pseudo-law via regulation.

Its latest recommendations for children and adolescents 12 and older were
published earlier this month
<http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2490528> in the *Annals of
Internal Medicine*. “The USPSTF recommends screening for major depressive
disorder (MDD) in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years,” the HHS task force said
in the summary of its position. “Screening should be implemented with
adequate systems in place to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective
treatment, and appropriate follow-up.” Why the federal government believes
it has any business coming between patients and doctors — or where it
believes the constitutional authority for such meddling is found — was not
immediately clear.

The outfit also left the door open for recommending such “screening” for
children under 12, too. “The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is
insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for
MDD in children aged 11 years and younger,” the Obama HHS panel wrote. The
recommendations also call for using controversial medications such as
Prozac to drug children between 12 and 17, while advocating powerful
psychotropic substances such as Lexapro for children as young as eight.

Already, about one in 10 American school-aged boys has been labeled and
drugged under the guise of “Attention Deficit Disorder” (ADD) and
“Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder” (ADHD). However, even the late
Dr. Leon Eisenberg, often described as the “father” or “inventor” of the
diagnosis, said before his death in an interview with German magazine *Der
Spiegel* that the alleged disease was “a prime example of a fabricated
disorder.” With the list of “disorders” expanding rapidly, and with that
list labeling more and more normal behaviors as symptoms of alleged
illness, critics have warned that the trend is deeply troubling.

When it comes to adults, the advisory panel, which purports to be
independent, wants to cast an even broader net. “The USPSTF recommends
screening for depression in the general adult population, including
pregnant and postpartum women,” said
<http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/depression-in-adults-screening1#Pod2>
the outfit, which adds that its views should not be construed as the
official position of the “Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality” or
Obama's HHS. “Screening should be implemented with adequate systems in
place to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and appropriate
follow-up.”

In its “rationale” for recommending that all U.S. adults be screened for
depression, the panel claims that the “illness” is “common in patients
seeking care in the primary care setting.” It also cites “adequate
evidence” allegedly showing some “improvements” if its advice is followed.

Then, unsurprisingly, the outfit downplays the very serious risks
<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/14655-prescription-for-murder>documented
by *The New American* magazine and many other sources — including
government and Big Pharma itself. For instance, the panel admits that
antidepressants are “associated” with harms, including an increase in
suicidal behavior, an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, fetal
harm, and more. But despite that, the task force “concludes with at least
moderate certainty that there is a moderate net benefit” to screening all
American adults. And by all, the task force means all: “The USPSTF
recommends screening in all adults regardless of risk factors,” it said.

Big Pharma and Big Government were no doubt pleased with the conclusion.
But not everyone was. Among those expressing concerns was Dr. Ron Paul, the
liberty-minded former congressman from Texas and GOP presidential
contender, who called the proposed mandatory screenings a “depressing
thought” in his weekly column
<http://thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/22490-mandatory-depression-screening-is-a-depressing-thought>.
“Basic economics, as well as the Obamacare disaster, should have shown this
task force that government health insurance mandates harm Americans,” wrote
Paul, a medical doctor. He warned that, among other problems, the scheme
would raise insurance costs. Even more troubling is that it would likely
result in new federal databases containing the results of the screenings,
which would be used to deny even more Americans their right to keep and
bear arms.

“Today, some mental health professionals think that those who believe in
limited government, free-market economics, or traditional values suffer
from mental disorders,” Paul explained, echoing growing concerns among
watchdogs monitoring the psychiatric industry. “If mandatory depression
screening becomes a reality, it is likely this mental health screening will
be expanded to cover screening for other mental illnesses. This could
result in anyone with an unpopular political belief or lifestyle choice
being labeled as 'mentally ill.'”

Other commentators also directly suggested that the new demands for more
“mental health” screening may be related to Obama's agenda to infringe on
gun rights. “With executive actions aimed at getting guns out of the hands
of the mentally ill, the timing of this report's release is rather
curious,” wrote Trey Sanchez with Truth Revolt, a conservative-leaning
outlet. “It seems reasonable to assume that mass screenings will produce
more diagnoses of depression, even for those patients who showed up a
little blue that day. But maybe that's the point: the more people there are
that can be labeled 'mentally ill' (indeed a disservice to those suffering
from actual mental illnesses), the less gun permits approved.”

It is hardly the first time in recent memory that Obama's HHS has demanded
extreme and anti-constitutional intrusions under the guise of “health.”
Indeed, the HHS has become increasingly bold in its demands for
totalitarianism. Last year, for example, it unveiled a push to target
American adults with vaccine mandates. In collaboration with Big Business
and special interests, bureaucrats outlined the “National Adult
Immunization Plan”
<http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/20642-obama-administration-plotting-adult-vaccination-mandates>
(NAIP)
to track Americans' vaccination records, wage a massive propaganda campaign
to “encourage” more inoculations, and foist more controversial vaccines on
adults against their will. Critics noted that the agenda includes
eventually imposing vaccines at gunpoint.

More recently, HHS, in partnership with the increasingly radical U.S.
Department of Education, unveiled a draft policy statement in which
families are referred to as Big Brother's “equal partners” in child rearing
<http://thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/22530-feds-seek-home-visits-calling-parents-equal-partners>.
As if that was not enough, the document called for expanding “home
visitation” programs. “Home visits by a nurse, social worker, or early
childhood educator during pregnancy and in the first years of life can make
a tremendous difference in the lives of many children and their families,”
argued Obama's HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell last year in announcing more
“grants” to send government workers to family homes.

The “equal partners” scheme also comes with important “mental health”
implications, as the policy statement makes clear. “Ensure constant
monitoring and communication regarding children’s social-emotional and
behavioral health,” the document demands. “Ensure that children’s
social-emotional and behavioral needs are met and that families and staff
are connected with relevant community partners, such as early childhood
mental health consultants and children’s medical homes.” In the policy
statement's “recommendations” for states — much of which will be imposed
through federal bribes — state governments are told to “expand early
childhood mental health consultation efforts.”

Of course, there is no constitutional authority for federally mandated
“mental health” exams or any other meddling in healthcare or family life.
Nor is there authority for a Department of “Health and Human Services” to
exist. As HHS and other unconstitutional agencies continue to expand, so
does the threat they pose to the liberties, well-being, and prosperity of
the American people. It is time for the public to demand that Congress
defund and shut down all unconstitutional agencies before the lawlessness
and totalitarianism become even more extreme.




__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMDlxbHFjBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTY2MDI3OTA->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJla2Nya2F0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NjYwMjc5MQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to