Plain Ol, are you saying that someone other than Obama is currently commanding the military? In light of Obama's epic incompetence I suppose that could be true, but who do you suspect is pulling the strings?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: >Why Threaten North Korea And China? Would Obama Start A War To Stay In Office? > >--- > >conspiracy delusion noted. > >we know who would like to start a war with NK and China and why. > > >On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 6:06:16 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote: > >[[ Oshito would have sex with a pig to stay in office. ]] > >Why Threaten North Korea And China? Would Obama Start A War To Stay In Office? > >Why Threaten North Korea And China? Would Obama Start A War To Stay In Office? > >Posted: 07 Mar 2016 08:10 PM PST > >Is Barack Obama trying to start a war, and will that war be used as an excuse >to stay in office once his term is over? Late in his second term, Obama is >starting to become extremely aggressive with the rest of the world. He just >angered China by sailing an aircraft carrier task force past disputed islands >in the South China Sea, he is provoking North Korea by simulating an invasion >of that nation during a military exercise that is going to involve more than >300,000 troops, and he is backing Saudi Arabia and Turkey as they make moves >that could very well start World War III in the Middle East. If a war did >begin, that could give Obama the excuse that he needs to exercise his >emergency powers, and that could potentially include suspending the election >that is scheduled for November. > >I know that all of this sounds a little bizarre, but it would help to explain >Obama’s extremely aggressive behavior lately. > >For example, why is the U.S. military risking a major incident on the Korean >peninsula? > >North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is about as paranoid as they come, and he is >extremely alarmed by the massive military exercise that is about to begin in >South Korea. More than 300,000 troops are gathering for what is being billed >as the biggest military exercise in the history of that nation. > >Reportedly, U.S. and South Korean forces plan to simulate an invasion of North >Korea and practice the elimination of North Korea’s weapons of mass >destruction. > >In response to these “exercises”, Kim Jong Un has placed his nuclear weapons >on standby for “use at any moment”, and he is warning that North Korea may >launch a “preemptive and offensive nuclear strike”… > >North Korea warned it would make a “preemptive and offensive nuclear strike” >in response to joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises that began Monday. > >The news was announced in a statement by the National Defense Commission of >North Korea and published in the state-run Korean Central News Agency. > >“As the joint military exercises to be staged by the enemies are regarded as >the most undisguised nuclear war drills aimed to infringe upon the sovereignty >of the DPRK, its military counteraction will be more preemptive and offensive >nuclear strike to cope with them,” the statement read. > >I don’t care how crazy someone is – if they have nuclear weapons and they >threaten to hit the United States with a preemptive nuclear strike, I am going >to get alarmed. > >Remember, North Korea did claim to successfully test a hydrogen bomb in >January, and the North Koreans did successfully launch a satellite into orbit >in February. > >The North Koreans absolutely hate us. In fact, hatred for the United States >is one of the pillars of their society. I know that may sound strange to many >Americans, but it is true. If you can believe it, each year they actually >have an entire month during which hatred for America is celebrated. > >Tensions on the Korean peninsula are running extremely high, and a single >hydrogen bomb could potentially kill millions of people. > >So why risk an incident? > >Why provoke North Korea more than necessary? > >Meanwhile, the Obama administration has been provoking China in the South >China Sea. > >Yes, it is a problem that China has seized control of several important >islands in the Spratly and Paracel island chains. But there are other ways to >handle this crisis rather than trying to show how tough you are. > >Last month, China deployed surface-to-air missile systems on the disputed >islands. Obama’s response was to sail an aircraft carrier task force past the >islands to see if China would start shooting at it. The following comes from >an article about this incident that was posted by the Navy Times… > >The U.S. Navy has dispatched a small armada to the South China Sea. > >The carrier John C. Stennis, two destroyers, two cruisers and the 7th Fleet >flagship have sailed into the disputed waters in recent days, according to >military officials. The carrier strike group is the latest show of force in >the tense region, with the U.S. asserting that China is militarizing the >region to guard its excessive territorial claims. > >Stennis is joined in the region by the cruisers Antietam and Mobile Bay, and >the destroyers Chung-Hoon and Stockdale. The command ship Blue Ridge, the >floating headquarters of the Japan-based 7th Fleet, is also in the area, en >route to a port visit in the Philippines. Stennis deployed from Washington >state on Jan. 15. > >Do we really want to go to war with China over these islands? > >The first time we sailed a military vessel through those waters after China >had claimed those islands, a Chinese state-run newspaper boldly declared that >China “is not frightened to fight a war with the U.S. in the region“. > >Most Americans don’t realize this, but our relationship with China is rapidly >going downhill. There is more to this than just the South China Sea, but >without a doubt this is a major point of contention as far as the Chinese >government is concerned. > >At the same time, we keep getting closer to World War III erupting in the >Middle East. Last month, defense ministers from 49 different nations met in >Brussels to discuss a ground invasion of Syria, and since that time forces >have been massing in northern Saudi Arabia and southern Turkey. > >If a ground invasion of Syria does take place, the goal would be to go to >Damascus and take down the Assad regime. That would put “coalition forces” in >direct conflict with Iran, Hezbollah and most importantly the Russians. It >could very easily be the spark that sets off World War III, but Saudi Arabia, >Turkey and their allies will never go ahead without the direct approval of the >Obama administration. > >Barack Obama does not need all of these flashpoints to erupt in order to evoke >his emergency powers. > >He just needs one of them. > >Throughout American history, presidents have always had emergency powers, but >since 9/11 these powers have been greatly enhanced. Given the right >circumstances, a U.S. president could now essentially declare himself (or >herself) a dictator for the duration of the crisis. > >Of course the word “dictator” would never actually be used, but that would be >the reality of the situation. > >And if we had a “national emergency” that was bad enough, Barack Obama would >have the authority to postpone or suspend the upcoming election. > >Let us hope and pray that does not happen, but the truth is that such a >scenario could actually take place. Hopefully what we are witnessing around >the globe right now are not attempts by Obama to artificially manufacture such >a crisis. Let us hope and pray that when his time is up that Obama is ready >to gracefully move into retirement. > >     > >You are subscribed to email updates from End Of The American Dream. >To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.Email delivery powered >by GoogleGoogle Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, >United States > > > >-- >-- >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > >* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >* Read the latest breaking news, and more. > >--- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"PoliticalForum" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to [email protected]. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
