Predictive Policing
---
by the time the IDF finishes programming US police profiling data everyone 
other than zionists will be suspect.
know the tactics of the enemy.

On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 6:49:23 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.wsj.com/articles/is-predictive-policing-the-law-enforcement-tactic-of-the-future-1461550190
>  
>  Is Predictive Policing the Law-Enforcement Tactic of the Future?A Johns 
> Hopkins professor says it helps reduce crime and police profiling. An 
> attorney at Electronic Frontier Foundation says it will lead to more 
> bias.[image: 
> Description: Predictive policing’s supporters say it will make police 
> departments more effective and improve community relations. Critics say it 
> will result in more bias.]Predictive policing’s supporters say it will 
> make police departments more effective and improve community relations. 
> Critics say it will result in more bias. Photo: iStockphoto/Getty Images 
> April 
> 24, 2016 10:09 p.m. ET As big data transforms industries ranging from 
> retailing to health care, it’s also becoming a more important tool for 
> police departments, which are turning to data and analysis in an effort to 
> boost their effectiveness.Known as predictive policing, the practice 
> involves analyzing data on the time, location and nature of past crimes, 
> along with things such as geography and the weather, to gain insight into 
> where and when future crime is most likely to occur and try to deter it 
> before it happens.Jennifer Bachner, director of the master of science in 
> government analytics program at Johns Hopkins University, says giving 
> police the ability to make data-driven decisions will help reduce biases 
> that result in unfair discrimination, resulting in better relations between 
> police and the communities they serve. Jennifer Lynch, senior staff 
> attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says predictive policing is 
> flawed and will only serve to focus more law-enforcement surveillance on 
> communities that are already overpoliced.YES: Police Can Be in the Right 
> Place at the Right TimeBy Jennifer Bachner In an era of tight budgets, 
> police departments across the country are being asked to do more with less. 
> They must protect the public, but often have to do it with limited 
> personnel, equipment and training resources.To address this problem, 
> law-enforcement agencies increasingly are turning to data and analytics to 
> improve their ability to fight crime without substantial increases in 
> operating costs. Known as predictive policing, these technologies and 
> techniques empower police officers to take a more proactive approach to 
> both preventing crime and solving open cases.Predictive policing involves 
> crunching data on past crimes, along with information such as the weather, 
> the time of day and the presence of escape routes, to forecast where and 
> when future crime is most likely to occur. In cities such as Santa Cruz, 
> Calif., officers have access to maps 
> <http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Management%20Predictive%20Policing.pdf>outlining
>  
> “hot spots,” 
> <http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Management%20Predictive%20Policing.pdf>
>  
> or geographic areas most vulnerable to crime at a future point in time, and 
> they are encouraged to use the information along with their knowledge of 
> the community to decide where to allocate the most resources on a given 
> shift.The theory isn’t complicated—being in the right place at the right 
> time deters crime—and the approach has proved effective 
> <http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.2015.1077710?journalCode=uasa20>,
>  
> particularly in places such as Santa Cruz, where the population is 
> dispersed over a large area.Some in law enforcement say predictive 
> policing is particularly helpful when it comes to identifying and halting 
> repeat criminals. The Baltimore County Police Department 
> <http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Predictive%20Policing.pdf>
>  
> says it used predictive methods to halt a string of convenience-store 
> robberies. Police had information about the locations of the robberies and 
> a suspected model of car used by the elusive offender, but no obvious next 
> target. By plotting the robbed locations on a map and employing an 
> iterative algorithm, police identified a suspected point of origin. Police 
> then analyzed the streets that would likely have been used to reach the 
> crime locations and detected one specific street that the offender had 
> likely used frequently (and would probably use again) to travel to crime 
> scenes. Officers staked out that street, rather than patrolling numerous 
> convenience stores, and were able to apprehend the suspect.Some critics 
> say that because not all crime is reported, predictive models based on past 
> crime data might miss future crimes that don’t fit historical patterns. But 
> today’s predictive models aren’t based solely on past crime data—they also 
> take into account some of the same things potential criminals do when 
> planning crimes, such as geographic information. [image: Description: 
> https://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/FT-AA145_PREDIC_9U_20160420115714.jpg]To
>  
> achieve positive results with predictive policing, some upfront costs are 
> required: Law-enforcement agencies must make an initial investment not only 
> in software, but also in training officers to understand the proper scope 
> and limitations of data-driven policing. The use of data, like the use of 
> any tool, leaves openings for misuse, but police departments can take steps 
> to protect civil liberties. There is a big difference, for example, between 
> predicting where crime is most likely to occur and developing lists of 
> potential future offenders without probable cause, a practice that 
> certainly raises serious ethical and legal concerns.Policy makers also 
> must grapple with the proper scope of data collection, retention and use 
> and be able to explain to the community how data is being used to enhance 
> public safety. That is why departments that adopt predictive-policing 
> programs must at the same time re-emphasize their commitment to community 
> policing. Officers won’t achieve substantial reductions in crime by holing 
> up in patrol cars, generating real-time hot-spot maps. Effective policing 
> still requires that officers build trust with the communities they serve. 
> With 
> proper implementation, monitoring and transparency, the trend toward 
> evidence-based policing should ultimately enhance the relationship between 
> communities and police officers. That’s because data-driven decision making 
> is a step away from decisions based on biases that can result in unfair 
> discrimination. Predictive models grounded in relevant data, including 
> everything from past crime to the weather, limit the influence of prejudice 
> or profiling by officers. The stakes are high, but predictive policing 
> offers an opportunity to make significant advances toward a safer and more 
> just society.Dr. Bachner is director of the master of science in 
> government analytics program at Johns Hopkins University. She can be 
> reached at [email protected] <javascript:>. NO: It Is Ineffective and Will 
> Increase Police BiasBy Jennifer Lynch Proponents of predictive policing 
> claim it will lead to unbiased policing and reduced crime. But in reality, 
> it will only further focus police surveillance on communities that already 
> are overpoliced and could threaten our constitutional protections and 
> fundamental human rights.There is little data to back up claims by makers 
> of predictive-policing systems that their products actually work. In fact, 
> one of the few independent studies 
> <http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR531.html> available—by Rand 
> Corp.—found that predicting technology used in Shreveport, La., was 
> ineffective at reducing crime. This is likely due to the way predictive 
> systems work. All predictive-policing systems analyze historical crime data 
> to predict where crimes are likely to occur in the future. Some also rely 
> on weather data, consumer financial data, property records and even 
> information about family members or gathered from social-media posts to 
> predict who is likely to be involved in future crimes. But these systems 
> aren’t clairvoyant. Because algorithm-training models must rely on data 
> about known past crimes, they can only predict future incidents that 
> resemble the nature, time and location of prior crimes. Previous Cities 
> CoverageAtlanta’s Mayor on the Leadership Role of Cities 
> <http://www.wsj.com/articles/kasim-reed-on-the-future-of-cities-as-global-leaders-1404764926>
>  Tokyo’s 
> Plan for Hydrogen-Powered Olympics 
> <http://www.wsj.com/articles/tokyo-hopes-to-make-hydrogen-power-the-star-of-the-2020-olympics-1442174267>
>  A 
> Cartoonist’s Skewed Look at Manhattan’s Small Businesses 
> <http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-cartoonists-skewed-look-at-small-business-1448248054>A
>  
> Garden Grows in Champaign 
> <http://www.wsj.com/articles/second-acts-a-garden-grows-in-champaign-1458525868>
>  That 
> means predictive-policing systems will miss at least 50% of crime because 
> we only have data on about half of the crime 
> <http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5366> that occurs in the 
> U.S., according to government estimates; the other half is never reported. 
> The result is that systems will miss crimes that don’t fit patterns from 
> the past, and law-enforcement agencies will devote more resources to 
> looking for crimes they would already have found the old-fashioned way and 
> less on crimes that require longer and deeper 
> investigations.Predictive-policing 
> systems also are vulnerable to a feedback-loop problem: As data on arrests 
> and criminal activity reported as a result of predictive policing are fed 
> back into the system, they will justify initial crime prediction and ensure 
> police will continue to look for crime in the same places as they always 
> have.Putting aside concerns about effectiveness, using past crime as a 
> model for predicting future crime has a deeper problem: It will perpetuate 
> police bias. All of us commit crime, yet only some crimes are selected for 
> enforcement. This is due partly to departmental priorities but also to 
> well-documented racially biased policing 
> <http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/racial-profiling2011/the-reality-of-racial.html>.
>  
> Police bias informs crime data fed into predictive-policing systems, 
> reinforcing existing inequalities in which neighborhoods and racial groups 
> are most targeted by police. This makes decisions to focus on certain areas 
> or groups appear impartial because the algorithm itself can’t be racist. It 
> also allows intentional racism to be disguised as an unintentional 
> byproduct of the system.Predictive-policing systems that rely on 
> information from social-media posts to predict whether a person may be more 
> likely to engage in crime or escalate the dangerousness of a situation also 
> raise free-speech issues. People limit what they say when they know they 
> are being watched, so models that rely on people’s speech have the very 
> real potential to chill free expression. Ultimately, we are fundamentally 
> uncomfortable with the notion that an algorithm can predict what we will do 
> before we even decide to do it—and tell the police about it. A system that 
> takes incomplete, unreliable and biased data and spits out a conclusion 
> that a particular person will commit a crime—or that crime will occur in a 
> particular community—doesn’t give people the opportunity to choose a 
> different path. Instead, by increasing police focus on certain people and 
> areas, the prediction that someone will commit crime or that some 
> communities will have more crime almost becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, 
> because when the number of police is increased in a given area, it almost 
> always results in more arrests.Rather than relying on predictive models 
> to find crime, analytics could be used to address underlying societal 
> factors that can lead to criminal behavior. A pilot program 
> <http://www.nccdglobal.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/la_dpp_evaluation_report.pdf>
>  
> in Los Angeles, for example, is using predictive models to find the most 
> at-risk children in the child-welfare system and provide them with services 
> designed to help them stay out of the juvenile-justice system. With 
> appropriate resources, these kinds of programs could do more to change the 
> cycle of crime than using yet another technology to put people behind bars.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> __._,_.___
> ------------------------------
> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Visit Your Group 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcmpmaDNyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjE2MjM0ODM->
>  
>    
>    - New Members 
>    
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnYWE0bjhuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDYxNjIzNDgz>
>  
>    2 
>
> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZjU2NnIzBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MTYyMzQ4NA-->
>  
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • 
> Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use 
> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to