republicans are afraid of muslims and also afraid to secure the border.


On Saturday, April 30, 2016 at 2:58:48 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *For 1 key group Trump's Muslim ban is yuuge *
>
> On 04/28/2016 
>
> When GOP front-runner Donald Trump announced his idea of temporarily 
> banning the immigration of Muslims to the Untied States, his idea was 
> condemned by virtually the entire Republican Party.
>
> Jeb Bush responded, 
> <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeb-bush-trump-muslim-ban-debate>
> “Seriously?”
>
> Speaker of the House Paul Ryan addressed the nation to condemn it. 
> <http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/paul-ryan-responds-to-donald-trumps-call-for-ban-on-muslims/>
>
> Even Ted Cruz wouldn’t support it. 
> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/12/08/ted-cruz-rejects-trumps-muslim-ban-policy-but-stands-by-trump-himself/>
>
> But there’s one massive group of people that overwhelmingly backs Trump’s 
> proposal: Republican primary voters.
>
> A poll taken soon 
> <http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/trumps-muslim-plan-a-huge-hit-with-gop-primary-voters/>
>  
> after Trump announced his plan in December showed almost two-thirds of 
> Republican voters in favor of it. And as the votes are cast in state after 
> state, support for Trump’s proposal is actually higher in some areas.
>
> In the Northeastern primaries held earlier this week, 
> <http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/gop-results-trump-set-for-5-state-sweep/> 
> exit polls showed almost 70 percent of voters in New York and Pennsylvania 
> supported Trump’s proposed ban. This narrowly exceeds the support expressed 
> for the policy in supposedly more conservative Southern states.
>
> G.M. Davis, who earned his doctorate in political science from Stanford 
> University and is author of “House of War: Islam’s Jihad against the 
> World,” 
> <http://superstore.wnd.com/products_by_author/G.M.--Davis?promocode=MSTORY> 
> said the widespread popular support for Trump’s policy shouldn’t be a shock 
> to Republican leaders.
>
> “It is an eminently reasonable and moderate proposal, which one hopes will 
> set the tone for more sweeping proposals as the campaign progresses,” he 
> said.
>
> “It demonstrates that Mr. Trump understands the danger posed by Muslim 
> immigration as well as the slanted politics of the issue, which routinely 
> cast such proposals as his own as ‘extreme,’ ‘racist,’ etcetera and which 
> requires special handling from figures such as himself.”
>
> Davis argued Republican leaders are committed to an agenda of 
> globalization, which leads them to put political correctness ahead of 
> national security.
>
> “On the issue of Muslim immigration, perhaps more than any other, ordinary 
> voters and the establishment of both parties are divided,” Davis said. 
> “Really, the establishment is happy to give voters whatever they like as 
> long as the general program of globalization continues to move forward. 
> That program entails the continued demolition of national borders, the 
> mixing of national, religious and ethnic populations, and the general 
> dissolution of local and regional distinctions of all sorts around which 
> ordinary people can rally to defend their traditional freedoms.
>
> “Ongoing immigration, especially Muslim immigration, is central to the 
> general plan of eroding national integrity and identity, which is exactly 
> why the establishment loves it and ordinary voters hate it.”
>
> In fact, support for a temporary ban on Muslim immigration far exceeds 
> support for Trump himself.
>
> Large majorities support the policy even in states that voted against 
> Trump. In Texas, which backed his Republican rival Cruz, 67 percent of GOP 
> voters supported Trump’s policy proposal. In Wisconsin, where Trump also 
> lost to Cruz, 69 percent agreed with Trump on banning Muslim entry into the 
> country. Sixty-five percent of Republican primary voters in Ohio also 
> supported Trump’s idea, even though the state went to Gov. John Kasich.
>
> Pamela Geller, an activist who speaks out against extremist Islam and the 
> author of “Stop the Islamization of America,” 
> <http://superstore.wnd.com/products_by_author/Pamela-Geller?promocode=MSTORY> 
> is one of those voters who supports Trump’s policy while not supporting 
> Trump himself.
>
> Geller, who has endorsed Cruz, called Trump “questionable on the free 
> speech issue” after Trump criticized her for hosting a contest featuring 
> images of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. 
> <http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/pamela-geller-named-woman-of-the-year/> 
> However, she called Trump’s idea “a common-sense solution.” 
>
> “There is no way to vet for jihadis or distinguish them from peaceful 
> Muslims,” Geller told WND. “Trump’s idea is so popular because people see 
> the problem of jihad and see how our leaders are not dealing with it 
> adequately. No one who had denounced Trump for suggesting this has come up 
> with an alternate plan.”
>
> Davis also said the whole issue of Muslim immigration and entry into the 
> United States is bigger than Trump himself.
>
> “Even a mere political opportunist ought to be able to see the 
> vote-winning potential on the issue,” claimed Davis. “Westerners, Europeans 
> and Americans are increasingly waking up to the nightmare of having their 
> lands invaded by a hostile ideology that recognizes nothing of their own as 
> sacred: not Christianity, not women’s rights, not freedom of speech, not 
> responsible, secular government. Regardless of how the 2016 election turns 
> out, the issue of Muslim immigration will persist, either as a focus of 
> policy in a Trump (or possibly Cruz) administration or as an ever-growing 
> elephant in the room of a Clinton administration.”
>
> The issue is likely to increase in importance as investigations continue 
> into the Dec. 2, 2015, terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. On 
> Thursday, the brother of Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino 
> attackers, was arrested and charged with marriage fraud, conspiracy and 
> lying under oath. 
> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/04/28/fbi-says-warrants-served-in-san-bernardino-investigation/>
>  
> Two other individuals related to Farook were also arrested.
>
> Philip Haney, a former Customs and Border Protection officer who won 
> numerous awards and commendations during his long career for analyzing 
> intelligence and identifying terrorists, argued 
> <http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/whistleblower-my-intel-couldve-stopped-san-bernardino/>
>  
> in December the San Bernardino attacks could have been prevented if the 
> federal government hadn’t shut down his investigation for fear of profiling 
> Muslims. He chronicles his experiences in the upcoming book “See 
> Something, Say Nothing.” 
> <http://superstore.wnd.com/See-Something-Say-Nothing-Hardcover?promocode=MSTORY>
>
> Haney told WND there is a lack of political will to carry out the laws 
> needed to protect the American people.
>
> “I support enforcement of our constitutionally mandated immigration laws, 
> so that we can more effectively protect our country from threats both 
> foreign and domestic,” he said. “The flaws in our current vetting system 
> are well documented. They are fixable, but only if there is concerted 
> effort.”
>
> However, Haney expressed some doubts about Trump’s plan, arguing it was 
> too vague.
>
> “He needs to clearly define ‘temporary’ and define exactly what he hopes 
> to accomplish during the halt,” he said.
>
> Regardless, Haney argues both Republicans and Democrats need to start 
> taking the threat of terrorism seriously because the American people won’t 
> settle for anything less.
>
> “This is not just a partisan issue but a national security issue,” the 
> former intelligence analyst warned. “The primary responsibility of our 
> elected officials, regardless of their party affiliation, is to do their 
> utmost to protect American citizens from those who seek to enter our 
> country in order to do us harm.”
>
> Haney concluded: “For almost eight years, the Obama administration has 
> supposedly been advising the American people if they ‘see something,’ they 
> need to ‘say something.’ Well, what the American people are seeing today is 
> very disturbing, and the support for Trump’s idea shows they are saying 
> something, too.” 
>
> URL to article: 
> *http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/for-1-key-group-trumps-muslim-ban-is-yuuge/ 
> <http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/for-1-key-group-trumps-muslim-ban-is-yuuge/> *
>
>
> __._,_.___
> ------------------------------
> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Visit Your Group 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmY2M5bXNsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjIwNDQ0NjY->
>  
>    
>    
> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZm5yNnFlBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MjA0NDQ2Ng-->
>  
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • 
> Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use 
> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to