http://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2016/05/16/clintons-crimes-and-comeys-choice-n2163202?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
*Clinton’s Crimes and Comey’s Choice*



Kurt Schlichter <http://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter>

|

Posted: May 16, 2016 12:01 AM



*FBI Director James Comey knew he had to make a decision that would change
his life, and maybe the history of his country, as he surveyed the piles of
papers spread out in his office. The Deputy Director in charge of the
investigation of Hillary Clinton – a criminal investigation, not some
benign “security review” as the Clintonistas had tried to spin it – sat
quietly, letting his boss think. The evidence was overwhelming. Hillary
Clinton was clearly guilty of multiple felonies, and the Obama Department
of Justice was not going to prosecute her. Now, it fell to Director Comey
to decide what he would do about it.*
*James Comey was a veteran prosecutor and former Deputy Attorney General
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey> who convicted hundreds of
criminals during his career before coming to direct the troubled Federal
Bureau of Investigations. Until now, his integrity always came first, and
he served faithfully regardless of the party in power, always careful to
put aside any personal political agenda, though he'd seen more than enough
people who didn't.*
*“There's no question, sir. None at all. She’s guilty.” said the Deputy
Director, telling Comey nothing he did not know. He had sat in the secure
classified information facility deep in the bowels of the Department of
Justice when his agents had made their two-hour presentation to the
stone-faced prosecutors. Clinton had grossly mishandled classified
documents in violation of 18 United States Code Sections 793
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793> and 1924
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924>. Some of the
information Clinton had on the bathroom server was so sensitive that his
agents needed upgraded clearances to see it, and it could only be discussed
behind reinforced concrete walls in a room scanned twice a day for bugs.
Clinton, because she did not want the accountability that came with using
official email, had given industrious hackers and foreign governments carte
blanche to pillage through some of America's most sensitive secrets. Though
her loyal acolytes tried to spin it as innocuous, anyone who ever held a
security clearance would go pale upon hearing what she had done.*
*Then there was the compelling evidence of the former Secretary of
State’s quid pro quoinfluence peddling – favorable Department decisions and
contracts linked to cash for contributions to the Clinton Foundation, which
was essentially just a slush fund that subsidized the ex-president and his
wife’s lavish lifestyle. And, of course, there wasobstruction of justice
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1519> – Clinton’s brazen
attempted destruction of over 30,000 emails. She might as well have wiped
them with a cloth <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2OJwsit0WY> because the
skilled FBI technicians were able to recover most of them – and what they
found was damning. *
*Well, it would be damning for anyone else. Even at that moment, there were
ongoing prosecutions brought with a fraction of the evidence his dozens of
agents had assembled against Clinton. At that moment, people were serving
sentences for doing less with less sensitive material. And if some company
under investigation had destroyed thousands of emails it had the legal
obligation to maintain, the CEO would already be sweating out shower time
in a federal prison. *
*But that briefing was weeks ago and since then there had been nothing from
Justice – not a word. In any other case, the grand jury would have been
empaneled and the indictments already issued. Here, no one had even
pulled Clinton’s security clearance. And now the rumor was that Loretta
Lynch had decided not prosecute, and that after her election Barack Obama
would pardon the President-elect “for the good of the country.” *
*It was clear that the law was, once again, not going to apply to Hillary
Clinton. Now Director Comey had to decide what he was going to do about it.
Would he go along quietly with something every fiber of his being told him
was a great wrong, or would he make a public stand and keep his integrity?*
*Comey tried to stay out of politics, but that didn't mean he was unaware
of them. If he was to go public after resigning in protest not even the
mainstream media that was backing Clinton could mitigate the damage. His
public act of conscience could very well hand office to Donald Trump, a man
someone with integrity like Director Comey could only loathe. The justice
system shouldn't determine an election, but then justice had to be blind,
didn't it? Was there to be one rule of law for all Americans, or a special
rule of law for the important and connected? *
*Comey could go along. He knew that's what President Obama wanted. Oh, the
President was far too clever to pick up the phone and tell his minions at
the DoJ not to indict. He didn't have to. They knew, and they would do it
without his fingerprints on it. And if Comey played along he'd be richly
rewarded. Unctuous functionaries had hinted as much. “You have a great
future, Director. I’m sure once you leave public service, you’ll have many,
many, many opportunities.” *
*But if he stood up for the law, they would destroy him. Comey had no
illusions about the price to be paid for crossing the Clinton machine. Ken
Starr, another man of integrity, had done it 20 years ago and to this day
remains exiled from elite society. The Clintons and their media minions
would mercilessly slander Comey and his family, tearing down his career of
public service and integrity. He would be a pariah.  *
*There was something the Mexican drug cartels say when they try to corrupt
government officials, Comey reflected. Plata o plumo. Silver or lead.*
*“What will you do, sir?” asked the Deputy Director. Comey gestured to the
door. *
*Now alone, Comey stared out his window, and his eyes settled on the tip of
the Washington Monument piercing the skyline of the city named in the first
president’s honor. There was no question what George Washington would do,
the Director mused. He sighed, stepped back toward his desk and picked up
the phone.*
*“I've made a decision,” he said.*




__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdTU0NDg3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjM0Mzc2MzM->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZjNsZDRoBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2MzQzNzYzMw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to