This was also an indirect shot at hillary I think since she is running on the promise of a third term of Obama policies. The Democrats must be coming to the realization that they have moved way to far to the left. This writer also realizes that Obama and his ilk is ruining the dems chances in the legislative elections I am assuming. On Jun 4, 2016 6:22 PM, "Hot4azintop via PoliticalForum" < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > This is at last.... and finally.... the Libs coming to grips with and > about Obama, our first Affirmative Action President.....guess better late > then never. But we have another Affirmative Action candidate waiting in the > wings to become President but it's not "skin color" this time....it's > "ovaries"! > > > > > > > > > > > Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society.” –Aristotle > > > > I guess Newsweek decided to go out with a bang > > > > > > *Newsweek Closed Its Doors with a Slam at Obama* > > > > Newsweek Is Now History. The *liberal* Newsweek Magazine is going out of > business, but not before it attacks the President. This is quite an > article, even more so when you consider that NEWSWEEK finally had the guts > to admit it. WOW! Newsweek COVER!!! It is their last cover before they > fold. Also read the article at the end. AMAZING!!! > > > > Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is > timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being > extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the > following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest > Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of > itself. At last, the truth about our President and his Agenda are starting > to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal > media... > > > > > By Matt Patterson > (Newsweek Columnist -- Opinion Writer) > > > > Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as > an inscrutable and phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass > hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they > will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so > many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the > world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? > > > > Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: > ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and > test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a > brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and > in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); > and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the > entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions. > > > > He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation > as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling > associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades > served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who > served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a > future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man > elected president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked > for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no > documentation for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in > history.Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz > addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no > white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of > America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill > Ayers, would have lasted a single day. > > > > But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of > liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American > injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass. Let > that Sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard because of > the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such > ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as > he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting > chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of > racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse > of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of > course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative > action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white > people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves. > Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on > the back. > > > > Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not > qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance > and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these > minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional > devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that > is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate > standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative > action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is. And that > is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by > his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama > was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades > at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a > mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be > president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step > of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite > of ample evidence to the contrary. > > > > What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every > time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive > qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, > and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to > be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of > cliches, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the > prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original > idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the > kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his > 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches) > > > > And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and > everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I > inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. > It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own > powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day > he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our > economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? > The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to > act responsibly? > > > > In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the > temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, > and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and > prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an > impostor in the Oval Office. > > > > P.S. Please send this article to family and friends throughout America > and ask them to read and distribute this article to other > > < /DIV> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > = > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
