*Attacks against Trump backfire on the conspiracy of dunces
<http://nypost.com/2016/06/04/attacks-against-trump-backfire-for-the-conspiracy-of-dunces/>*

By Michael Goodwin <http://nypost.com/author/michael-goodwin/>

June 4, 2016 | 10:52pm

[image: 2-photos9]

Modal Trigger
<http://nypost.com/2016/06/04/attacks-against-trump-backfire-for-the-conspiracy-of-dunces/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NY%2520Post%2520Newsletter&utm_source=Sailthru>
[image:
Attacks against Trump backfire on the conspiracy of dunces]

Photo: AP; Reuters

Are President Obama, Hillary Clinton and violent leftists in cahoots to
elect Donald Trump? Or are they just idiots?

The evidence is overwhelming that they all belong to a conspiracy — either
of secret GOP sympathizers or of dunces. Those are the only options after
Democrats took turns denouncing Trump in ways that actually bolstered the
potency of his arguments. Three examples tell the tale.

First, Obama traveled to Indiana to deliver what aides called his first
attempt to influence the election. That’s a lie, of course, but not the
biggest one of the day. No. 1 would be Obama’s touting the economy as a
roaring success.

“If what you care about in this election is your pocketbook; if what you’re
concerned about is who will look out for the interests of working people
and grow the middle class,” the president claimed, “if what you’re
concerned about is the economy, then the debate is not even close.”

He crowed about “progress” made during his tenure, and said sticking with
Democrats was the only sensible option.

Two days later, the Labor Department reported that employers added a mere
38,000 jobs in May, the worst report in six years. Even with massive help
from the Federal Reserve, the economy’s slow growth means it has created
three million fewer jobs than it should have by now, making Obama’s boast
look ridiculous.

It also makes Trump’s focus on creating jobs and criticism of
­international trade deals look like the right ideas. After all, if puny
growth for seven years is the best Obama can do, why not give the other
team and other ideas a chance?

Clinton provided the second backfire example with her ­foreign-policy
speech. It had very little to do with actual foreign policy, and everything
to do with a rehearsed rant on Trump. She called him reckless, childish,
uninformed and unprepared.

“This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes,” she declared.

Modal Trigger[image:
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/usa-election_trump1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=247&strip=all]Photo:
Reuters

The liberal press ate it up, displaying a remarkable talent for ignoring
the foreign-policy ­disasters unfolding around the world, courtesy of
Clinton and Obama. The next president will inherit the brutal aggressions
of China and Russia and the cancerous spread of Islamic terrorism.

And it takes a special media willfulness to refuse to see the biblical
deprivations befalling millions of refugees spilling out from Syria and
Libya after Obama and Clinton helped turn those countries’ crises into
­catastrophes. In a recent span of just eight days, about 1,000 people
drowned trying to escape across the Mediterranean to ­Europe.

If that’s the best Dems can do, why should they get a third term? Would
Trump be worse?

The third evidence of a conspiracy involved a Trump rally in San Jose,
Calif. Or rather, it ­involved the thugs, gang members and people burning
the American flag and waving Mexican flags who attacked Trump supporters.

An ABC reporter tweeted that police lost control and that “Trump supporters
[were] being terrorized and beaten up by mobs of protesters.” Among those
beaten was a man named Juan Hernandez, a gay Latino Trump supporter who
released photos of his broken nose and bloody shirt, along with a
statement, writing:

“Got jumped last night as we exited the rally . . . Thanks for a broken
nose, uncontrollable bleeding, and a bash to the head, Democrats. You sure
are doing your party proud.”

As Hernandez notes, the violence helps make Trump’s case. If the
candidate’s promise to control the border brings such a ferocious backlash,
he’s on to something.

That scary thought must have seeped into the central brain of The New York
Times, which gave a disgracefully distorted picture of what happened in San
Jose
<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/04/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-violence.html?_r=0>.
It called the one-way ­assaults “clashes” between “protesters” and Trump
backers, as if both sides were equally to blame.

Even more shameful, the paper’s Friday article included this sentence:
“While Mr. Trump has said he does not condone violence of any kind, his
campaign made little effort to condemn it.”

You can’t be that ignorant without intent.

The pattern is obvious — the Democrats’ Way is in trouble. The economy
won’t cooperate with their big-government nostrums, Clinton is dodging
Bernie Sanders and the FBI, and Obama doesn’t understand why the world
doesn’t treat his every ­utterance as gospel.

Maybe they should take a hint. Maybe, finally, America has had enough.

*Violent schools’ math problem*

How violent are New York City schools? Good question, but there’s no good
answer.

A mishmash of conflicting data were revealed when parents, supported by
charter groups, sued the city, saying there is so much crime that students
are denied their right to a sound education. They point to state statistics
gathered by schools that show a 23 percent increase in violent incidents
last year.

But the city uses a different measurement compiled by the NYPD. It showed
violent incidents declined slightly in the same period.

This is nuts. You can’t solve a problem if you can’t measure it.

Then again, maybe that’s the point. It’s easier for educrats to hide behind
confusion rather than make schools safer. No news there, only tragedy as
usual.

*The Blas & Cuomo snipe fest*

Tolstoy’s opening line in “Anna Karenina,” that “All happy families are
alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way,” also applies to
political feuds. Witness the unhappy battle between New York’s top
Democrats.

With federal prosecutors probing both Gov. Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio, the
officials’ sniping at each other amounts to a shootout in a lifeboat. Even
the survivor might not last long.

For his part, de Blasio is fixated on the least of his legal problems — a
state Board of Elections report that accused him of “willful and flagrant
violations” of campaign-finance laws. Repeatedly accusing Cuomo of
orchestrating the report and leaking it to the press, he said it employed a
double standard by ignoring Cuomo’s fund-raising.

Even when the leaker was identified as a Republican operative, de Blasio
refused Cuomo’s demand for an apology, saying it’s “not going to happen.”

The governor, never one to turn the other cheek, had aides bombard de
Blasio with mocking Twitter attacks. “I’m sure saying ‘I was wrong’ is one
of the hardest things to do in politics, but continuing this charade at
this point is just silly,” a Cuomo spokesman wrote. Later, he added that
“Deflect is a lesser known river in Egypt as well.”

So far, there is no indication the twin federal investigations are linked,
and de Blasio certainly looks to be in more personal hot water.

Still, the feds could use the feud to their advantage: Put both men under
oath and get them to tell all they know about each other. That would be
special.

*A key difference between Trump and Obama*

Reacting to my column that Donald Trump and President Obama are “two sides
of the same coin
<http://nypost.com/2016/05/29/obama-and-trump-are-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/>,”
reader Charles Parham begs to differ, writing: “Trump loves the country,
Obama loathes it.”


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmc2NwcjNiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjUxMzYxMDY->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZjd1bnByBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2NTEzNjEwNw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to