No…nothing will remove the stink of scandal from either Clinton.


B

*Only a Proper Pardon Could Clear Mrs. Clinton From Taint of Scandal*

*By SETH LIPSKY <http://www.nysun.com/authors/Seth+Lipsky>, Special to the
Sun | July 6, 2016*

AddThis Sharing Buttons

Share to Facebook3Share to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailMore AddThis
Share options24

No sooner did the director of the FBI, James Comey, take a powder on the
Hillary Clinton scandal than the calls started coming for the appointment
of a special counsel. If Mr. Comey’s idea was to quell the controversy, it
looks like he failed.

Click Image to Enlarge[image: http://www.nysun.com/pics/10092_large.jpg]
<http://www.nysun.com/pics/10092.jpg>

So how’s the idea of a presidential pardon looking now?

I made that suggestion a year ago in the New York Post, and to me it grows
more logical by the hour. Mr. Obama, I noted, wouldn’t need his infamous
phone to do it. He could pardon Hillary Clinton with the stroke of a pen.

He could pardon Mrs. Clinton of the crimes the Republicans say she
committed. He could pardon her of the crimes that even Mr. Comey says she
committed but that “no reasonable prosecutor” would pursue.

Even a pardon might not end the controversy. But it would end Mrs.
Clinton’s legal jeopardy (which will still be there if a Republican
administration comes into power or a special counsel is appointed).

And Mr. Obama, unlike Mr. Comey, would be fully within his powers to make
the decision to let Mrs. Clinton skate. The pardon power is the most
straightforward power the president has.

Mr. Obama could write the pardon on a napkin, and that would be it. He
doesn’t have to consult with the Justice Department. He doesn’t have to ask
a judge. It doesn’t have to be confirmed by the Senate.

The president wouldn’t even have to give a reason or explain himself. He
could, echoing Senator Sanders, say that “people are sick and tired of
hearing about your damned e-mails.”

I’m not suggesting Mr. Obama *ought* to use the pardon. I’m simply saying
that the pardon is the last move left after the hash the Justice Department
made of the case.

A pardon wouldn’t entirely lift the taint from Hillary Clinton. The only
way to do that would have been what the Chicago Tribune’s managing editor
did when he was accused during World War II of inadvertently disclosing
that we’d cracked the Japanese code.

The editor, J. Loy Maloney, barged into the United States attorney’s
office. He demanded that he and his reporter, Stanley Johnston, who had
just come from the Coral Sea, be put in front of a grand jury immediately.

When they were, the grand jury refused to indict them. What a contrast with
Hillary Clinton. She’s whinged for a year about e-mailgate. She’s never
demanded to be put in front of a grand jury, or to be tried by a jury in
open court.

Instead, she’s curried favor with the president. Her husband fetched up on
the attorney general’s plane at the most delicate hour. Her campaign put
out a statement saying she might keep the attorney general, Loretta Lynch,
on in her administration.

Maybe it will all blow away. More likely the doubts and controversy will
swirl until November, obscuring the big policy issues in the campaign on
which a lot of us think she’s even more vulnerable.

In recent weeks alone we’ve seen that she just doesn’t get Europe. She
sided against independence for England (in sharp contrast to the more
thoughtful and diplomatic Donald Trump).

Mrs. Clinton me-too’d Mr. Trump on the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership.
She’s sided against Israel and Congress on the articles of appeasement that
President Obama entered into with Iran.

She was outmaneuvered by Mr. Sanders on the Democratic platform. If the
draft holds, she’ll be running on a platform that invites negotiations on
Jerusalem. She can be counted on to raise taxes and government debt.

It may be that the calls for a special counsel will grow in coming weeks.
But even the New York Times is acknowledging that Mr. Comey’s cosmetics
provide Trump with a “ready-made attack ad.”

I’ve long been leery of prosecutors stepping in against politicians in the
thick of a political fight. I’ve been with the conservatives who fought
against prosecutors harrying the Reagan administration. Fight on the
issues, we said.

At least with a pardon, a political leader would take responsibility. James
Comey had no statutory or constitutional business making the decision on
whether to prosecute. At least with a pardon, Mr. Obama would be saying,
“blame me.”


------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMWJvazFtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NjgwMDc1MjU->

   - New Members
   
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaXN0ZmxxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDY4MDA3NTI1>
   1

[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlM2txaXEyBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2ODAwNzUyNQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to