https://www.policeone.com/active-shooter/articles/200688006-Terror-in-America-Why-we-need-to-change-our-training-for-active-threats/


Terror in America: Why we need to change our training for active
threatsOfficers
must be trained to move quickly to contact, with much greater emphasis on
cover and concealment than in the past

Yesterday at 5:29 PM
------------------------------

   -
   -
   -
   -
   -
   -

By Joe Hendry
PoliceOne Special Contributor

Google “Law enforcement active shooter training” and be prepared to scroll
through hundreds of photos of officers — inside and outside — practicing
moving to the threat in densely-packed formations. Watch news stories about
active threat training on any station and watch the movements of the team.
Don’t look at them from our perspective. Look at them through the eyes of
the threat.

Read the open-source articles in which law enforcement is told that the use
of suppressive fire and distraction rounds are not allowable. Look at the
photos and see how many officers are carrying pistols versus how many are
carrying rifles. See if they are equipped with helmets, ballistic shields
and vests.

Read and listen to the reporting about which facilities use lockdown for
response over evacuation to gauge how quickly you can gain total control
over building occupants. Read which facilities hire experts who teach
lockdown as a primary response. Now, type your notes as if you were
preparing to attack the facility.

*The Coming Threat*
The terrorist threats have already been doing so and have gone so far as to
publish a document, in English, for their followers in the West titled
“Safety and Security Guidelines for Lone Wolf Mujahideen and Small Cells.”
The fact is terrorists overseas have been planning on utilizing lockdown
tactics in order to corral large numbers of civilians and kill them for
more than a decade.

Experts in the field agree that video stills in a February 2015 article in
US News and World Report
<http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/02/20/classroom-terror-too-horrible-to-discuss-too-pressing-to-ignore>
show al-Qaida training to kill women and children, in lockdown, in
educational facilities. The video was captured in Afghanistan in 2002.

I’ve read hundreds of articles about the law enforcement response. I’m a
trainer or have taken part in training for every concept we have utilized
since the mid-90s. I was originally trained tactically by the Marines 30
years ago. We have moved from a SWAT response model to Quad Tactics (Stack,
Diamond, T Formation, et.al.) to Solo Engagement.

We have based our response on mainly dealing with a single threat — which
is not highly trained — who usually uses a handgun. We have heavily relied
on training that requires groups of officers to bunch together, telling
them to bypass doorways, bypass wounded, bypass potential explosive
devices, and move straight to threat. Telling them to do those things now —
facing new adversaries — has great potential to be deadly.

*A Change in Training*
I believe we are on the cusp of our fourth tactical change in the past 17
years. Tactics that combine single option law enforcement response with
military-style bounding overwatch, for locations inside and outside of
facilities. Tactics that may include suppressive fire and distraction
rounds being a natural part of the training. Tactics that take into account
that the suspects are trained in the use of military tactics, will place
explosive devices with sensors in hallways, will use incendiary devices
(especially in locations where lock down is the preferred option and
secondary locking devices that require fine motor skills or special
knowledge to remove are used) and almost always plan on not surviving their
own assault.

We will also have to begin training under the assumption that, during a
terrorist attack, the suspects are wearing suicide vests or belts. While
the class Preventing and Responding to Suicide Bombing Incidents (PRSBI)
has been taught for many years, most line officers have not been exposed to
this type of training.

New team training will look very different — closer to resembling solo
engagement — and away from tight formation movement. Officers must still be
trained to move quickly to contact, with much greater emphasis on cover and
concealment than in the past. Instead of a team of densely-packed officers
in a formation in the middle of a hallway, which could easily be
neutralized by a motion sensor explosive or incendiary devices or gunfire,
officers may be moving forward alone or in small teams of two officers.

Officers would “bound” forward while being covered — possibly with
suppressive or distractive fire in contact — by the officers who are in an
overwatch position. When the “bounding” officers reach a position, they
would then provide overwatch for officers who would then proceed to their
position or even further. Officers’ training will have to include being
under fire by an adversary who has trained and prepared for their response.

These tactics provide greater cover and, if an explosive device is tripped,
does not neutralize an entire team of officers. It is also highly likely
that threats will begin to combine firearms and tactical utilization of
incendiary devices. Because so many locations used lockdown training for
active shooters as the response for active threats for twenty years,
millions of Americans have only been trained to turn off lights, get on the
ground, and not move — a sure recipe for success by the terrorists.

In addition, many buildings have focused more on heating and cooling than
on occupant survival. Most facilities have windows that do not open or open
only slightly. An incendiary device would render the hallway unusable for
evacuation or rescue and would probably trap most building occupants. Many
windows on building perimeters are thick glass and difficult to break. Some
facilities have even placed shatter proof film over the perimeter windows.
While ‘Crime Prevention through Environmental Design’ may stop some basic
criminal activity, it also can effectively create mass casualty zones
inside facilities if evacuation is not given priority in building design.

Building design must be codified and changed. Fire and life codes exist
based on past lessons. Building design was changed drastically in response
to the threat of fire. Things we take for granted — wide hallways, wired
smoke detectors, outward opening doors, panic bars, alarms, structural
materials, sprinkler systems, etc. — all changed because of codification.
This should be no different. We need doors from the perimeters of first
floor rooms, windows that open wide enough for egress, doors that have
multiple securing points in the frame that can be utilized without using
fine motor skills.  We need to get rid of secondary locking mechanism
devices, address the lack of windows in hallway walls, eliminate fencing
with few egress points on a perimeter, and add windows in doors next to
door locks.

Officers must be trained in new tactics, given proper equipment (rifles,
ballistic vests, helmets, shields, first aid trauma kits). Fire personnel
must be prepared to enter and treat wounded while facilities may only be
partially secured. We need to make evacuation a priority in building design
for terrorism/active threats and fire. Civilians must be trained in all of
their options — evacuation, barricading, and counter measures — to respond
based on their circumstance.

We need to stop training and building for the last event — because the next
event is coming someday.




------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZGJtcTMzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0Njg5NjU5MTk->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOWJsZW5kBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2ODk2NTkxOQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to