July 22, 2016
Elections
Kamikaze Cruz
by Nicholas James Pell
The big news of the day: Ted Cruz declined to endorse Donald Trump. Instead, he used his RNC address to deliver an extended passive-aggressive slight. Cruz urged delegates to “vote your conscience,” a rather strange phrase coming from a man who doesn’t appear to have one.
Two years ago, I wrote about how Ted Cruz was the sleaziest politician this side of Bill Clinton. Last night he vindicated every uncharitable thought I’ve ever had toward him. His refusal to endorse Trump explicitly violates the terms of the loyalty pledge specifically designed to hedge Trump in. In short, Cruz respects the democratic process…at least until he loses.
Convention attendees weren’t fans of Cruz’s speech. Some had to be physically restrained from assaulting him. One site reported that he lost 25% of his Facebook following. His wife, Heidi, was escorted out of the building by security while attendees yelled, “Goldman Sachs!” at her. Donors openly called Cruz a “ disgrace” to his face, and he was forbidden from entering Sheldon Adelson’s suite. The Donald was his usually low-key and laid-back self, noting that Ted got booed off the stage and that the whole thing was not a big deal.
The speech itself was a sort of bizarre inversion of Pat Buchanan’s culture-war speech from 1992. Cruz neither secured himself as a permanent fixture in the party nor gave voice to a defeated faction. Instead, he hogged the spotlight, dripping smug arrogance over the proceedings and mocking the New York delegation when the whole room began drowning him out with chants of “Say his name” and “We want Trump.” “I appreciate the enthusiasm of the New York delegation,” Cruz said, smirking, drawing intensified booing.
Cruz attempted to use the speech to kick off his 2020 campaign, which he says he will do whether Trump wins or not. So he threw chum to the odd philosophy of “true conservatism,” a strange civic religion that views America’s founders in quasi-messianic terms. If you’re interested in the particulars, spend some time poking around The Blaze, if you can stomach it. Indeed, the speech resembled a sort of litany from the Evangelical Constitutionalism of Cruzbekistan. Cruz hit on guns, the Supreme Court, and Obamacare, but also Martin Luther King, the Civil Rights Act, and even gay rights, all of which are retconned as “true conservatism.” The word “freedom” appeared 21 times.
The next day, Cruz gave a speech to the Texas delegation. He didn’t walk back his damning with faint praise, but attempted to talk out of both sides of his mouth, as is his habit. Cruz spoke repeatedly of the “principles” his movement embodies, saying they were the only way to defeat Hillary Clinton. How these principleswhich mostly involve losing to liberals with smug self-satisfactionwill win a general election when they can’t even win a Republican primary is unclear. But again, none of this matters, because the point isn’t to win, it’s to allow supporters to pat themselves on the back for losing with decorum.
Cruz got down to brass tacks when he said, “I am not in the habit of supporting people who attack my wife and attack my father.” This might be easier to believe if Cruz didn’t appear to be the type of person who would sell his family to organ harvesters if he thought it would further his career. A fund-raising appeal went out from what remains of the Cruz campaign almost immediately.
Not much about Cruz’s speech at the convention was surprising. From the bland, empty phrases about “freedom” to the incorporation of Martin Luther King and same-sex marriage into the family of “true conservatism” to the smug condescension toward convention delegates who had frankly had enough of him, all of it was par for the course. This is, after all, a man who launched his national political ambitions by using embattled Arab Christians as a prop to curry favor with that segment of Americans who think Israel should be the 51st state.
Cruz firmly believes that a single-term Hillary presidency, and the Supreme Court justices who would come with it, are a small price to pay for an open path to the nomination in 2020. That’s not surprising, considering that his father, Rafael, a dominionist preacher, believes that Ted is “anointed” to “take control of society.” Back here in the real world, it’s not clear that Ted ever had a path to the nomination. His peculiar civic religion doesn’t seem to have much pull among anyone not buying food buckets from Glenn Beck in Greater Deseret.
This won’t be remembered as Cruz’s tough, principled stand against the Republican Party’s betrayal of true conservatism. Cruz in 2016 isn’t Goldwater in 1960 or Reagan in 1976. If Cruz’s speech is remembered at all two weeks hence, it will be as the last time anyone ever talked about Ted Cruz, the most spectacular live televised suicide this side of Bud Dwyer. Already a man with a reputation as not just a loose cannon but a kamikaze pilot who targets his own side and will say or do absolutely anything, Cruz must now accept that his political career is over. Look for him blogging at The Blaze or leading a new (and no doubt lucrative) life as a televangelist, both tasks he seems far better suited for.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
http://takimag.com/article/kamikaze_cruz_nicholas_james_pell/print#axzz4FG92QJwn --
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
- Kamikaze Cruz MJ
- Re: Kamikaze Cruz 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum
