The Washington Times

*www.washingtontimes.com* <http://www.washingtontimes.com/>





*Wild Charges over Hacking of the DNC*



By Richard W. Rahn

*Published August 2, 2016*





IF PUTIN WANTED TO HELP A CANDIDATE, HE WOULD CHOOSE HILLARY



Did the Russians hack the emails of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)
and Hillary Clinton? The answer is almost certainly “yes,” but that does
not mean that the DNC and other emails were released on behalf of the
Kremlin to help Donald Trump. The basis for my skepticism of the charge
that the email dumps were ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin is as
follows.



To begin with, I am no fan of Mr. Putin and the Russian government, as I
was subjected to Russian-Bulgarian disinformation campaigns; because of my
high-profile work on the economic transition in Bulgaria and Russia in the
early 1990s; and my expose of Russia payments to members of the Bulgarian
Parliament to support the now-abandoned proposed gas pipeline from Russia
to Bulgaria (2 years ago).



It is well known that a number of countries — including Russia, China,
Israel, France, the United Kingdom and the United States — routinely
monitor international phone calls of people of interest, including
government leaders, suspected terrorists, potential wrongdoers,
international business people and others. Remember the flap when it was
revealed that the United States was listening in on German Chancellor
Angela Merkel’s phone calls? The problem was that it was revealed, not that
it happened. Emails that are not highly encrypted are relatively easy to
hack into. Sophisticated state actors like Russia can do it without leaving
“fingerprints.” This is why FBI Director James Comey said it was “possible
that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email
account.” It would be my bet that not only Russia, but China and other
state actors, gained access, because it would be a dereliction of duty for
any major state intelligence agency not to have done so, given Mrs.
Clinton’s position as secretary of State.



The Clintons have been covert financial allies of Mr. Putin for a number of
years. We know that Russian money, from state-controlled energy companies
Rosneft and Gazprom, found its way to at least one Bermuda-based
foundation. This foundation, in turn, supplied tens of millions of dollars
to the Sea Change Foundation (a bundler for environmental groups), which
then sent millions on to the Sierra Club, the National Resources Defense
Council and others. These environmental organizations are allies of
President Obama and the Clintons, and are actively involved in a war
against fossil fuels and pipeline projects. There have been detailed and
easy-to-find stories about the above in the press for the last couple of
years. Related is the curious fact that Mikhail Lesin, who built the RT TV
network for Mr. Putin and then became a senior official of Gazprom, was
beaten to death in a Washington hotel room on Nov. 5, 2015. Lesin was
almost certain to have known what monies went from Russian sources to the
U.S. environmental groups and the Clinton Foundation.



The Clinton Foundation has been the recipient of Russian-sourced money,
some through its Canadian affiliate. The New York Times published a very
lengthy story, including a front-page version on April 24, 2015,
documenting how tens of millions of dollars flowed from Russia and
Kazakhstan through intermediaries to the Clinton Foundation and other
Clinton allies. The complex scheme eventually “gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States … . Among
the agencies that eventually signed off [on the deal] was the State
Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.”
Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 to speak in Moscow in June 2010 — “the same
month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.” The fee
was “paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian bank with ties to the Kremlin.”



Questions to ponder: The major Russian intelligence agencies are well
skilled in hiding their tracks when doing email hacks — so why would they
in this case leave tracks back to a Russian source? Given the close
financial relationship between the Clintons and the Kremlin, why would Mr.
Putin want to switch his support to Mr. Trump? If the Russians do have
copies of Hillary’s 30,000 missing emails, wouldn’t they be more useful as
potential blackmail than to reveal them during the campaign?



Disinformation and deception are used by state actors and others, as
Israeli analyst Dima Adamsky has written, “to manipulate the adversary’s
picture of reality, misinform it, and eventually interfere with the
decision-making process of individuals, organizations, governments and
societies.” Having been a target of disinformation, I can testify to how
disconcerting it is to be the subject, along with colleagues, to false
newspaper stories and TV “documentaries,” strange phone calls, computer
hacks and other forms of harassment.



Mr. Putin may have a real favorite in the U.S. presidential race, but,
remember, when trying to answer the question of his preference, it is
relatively easy for skilled operatives to make emails appear to come from
sources other than the real source, to alter emails, and to make hacks
appear to have come from others. Political campaigns have always been
subject to disinformation, e.g., false news stories and rumors. The digital
age just makes disinformation easier, and, hence, we all need to be less
naive about alleged “facts.”





*Richard W. Rahn is chairman of Improbable Success Productions*



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/1/wild-charges-over-hacking-of-the-dnc/



© Copyright 2016 The Washington Times, LLC.






------------------------------

[image: Description: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>




------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMWZoNXNuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzAxNDgyNjI->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMmNnbWppBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3MDE0ODI2Mg-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to