The mainstream media became far more systemically involved as the 
government’s tool to spread propaganda after two vital changes were made to 
the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which included an amendment 
that legalized the use of propaganda on the American public.

Our pretend “representatives” in Congress have proven that they do not 
represent the people, and instead exploit us for personal gain both 
political as well as monetarily. There had always been an anti-propaganda 
law that prevented the U.S. government from broadcasting programming to 
American audiences to politically influence people for political gain.

During the 1970s and 1980s, the prevailing view was that American taxpayers 
shouldn’t be funding propaganda for American audiences. On July 2, 2013, 
that law was silently repealed with the implementation of a new reform act. 
The bottom line: Congress knew what it was doing when it deliberately 
unleashed thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV 
programs for U.S. domestic propaganda efforts.

Our “pretend” representatives see no problem with propaganda today. 
Congress also allowed the repeal of the *Fairness Doctrine 
<https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/the-repeal-of-the-fairness-doctrine-has-been-our-demise/>*
 in broadcasting. They no longer require the mainstream media to tell the 
truth. Why do our politicians now believe they are entitled to lie, cheat, 
and use mainstream media to create state propaganda?

[image: Jefferson-Sig]

The Smith-Mundt Act prevented the government from engaging in propaganda 
domestically. Nevertheless, that restriction was only applied domestically. 
The U.S. government always had official propaganda programming produced by 
the Broadcasting Board of Governors that was only for foreign consumption 
such as Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and the Middle 
East Broadcasting Networks. The tone and nature always varied, and it was 
produced for more than 100 countries in 61 different languages. 
Nonetheless, the scope was always with a political intent. This is clearly 
against the principles of the First Amendment that the free press was to 
keep a check against government. Thomas Jefferson maintained:


* A press that is free to investigate and criticize the government is 
absolutely essential in a nation that practices self-government and is 
therefore dependent on an educated and enlightened citizenry. On the other 
hand, newspapers too often take advantage of their freedom and publish lies 
and scurrilous gossip that could only deceive and mislead the people. 
Jefferson himself suffered greatly under the latter kind of press during 
his presidency. But he was a great believer in the ultimate triumph of 
truth in the free marketplace of ideas, and looked to that for his final 
vindication.*

If anyone needed a reminder of the dangers of domestic propaganda efforts, 
the past 12 months have provided ample reasons. Additionally, just back in 
2012, two USA Today journalists were targeted for reporting about millions 
of dollars in back-taxes owed by the Pentagon’s top propaganda contractor 
in Afghanistan. The co-owners of the firm had to confess to creating phony 
websites and Twitter accounts designed to smear the journalists 
anonymously. Unfortunately, the government today is very focused on 
manipulating news and commentary on the internet, including social media. 
They are pretending to be people posting comments and honest reviews.

Here in this video, former Clinton/Gore political consultant Naomi Wolf 
explains why we should be skeptical of overly theatrical news stories. She 
points out that propaganda has become legal thanks to the very people 
claiming to be our representatives.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to