My mouth just hangs open whenever I switch to CNN. All hate all the time; 
nothing but leftwing loonbats or a 6-1 panel where 6 leftloons bash and 
talk over the one Trump supporter. They've become as bad as MSLSD ever was 
IMO.

On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 11:14:38 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> <Grin>!  I too swap over to OAN;  as well as Newsmax;  the Dennis Michael 
> Lynch Show comes on opposite Megyn Kelley, and I try to opt for him.   
> Megyn started out on Trump from the top of her show,   (and I ended up 
> watching it at the midnight hour showing....What a bitch!)
>
> As bad as FOX is getting, I still flip around to CNN, Bloomberg and MSNBC. 
>   FOX Still has them all beat, hands down.   It's pitiful even attempting 
> to compare the other news networks.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:19 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>> That's just sad.
>>
>> I've turned to OAN a couple of times this week, but they are so 
>> low-budget and one of the newscasters I saw on it didn't really know what 
>> he was talking about (in an interview about Hillary's health conditions). 
>> It appeared as if he'd failed to do even a half hour of research to clue 
>> himself in. But at least they are bringing up the right topics so people 
>> can go online and research for themselves; that is more than you can say 
>> for most of the shows on Fox anymore.
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 5:52:07 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Well said Perp!
>>>
>>> Yes, the two Murdoch son's,.  Bryl & Creem are not only far left liberal 
>>> extremists, they're Secular Progressive Moonbats right out of the 
>>> Euewtopian/Plain Ol' camp!  Expect major changes on that network soon.   
>>> O'Reilly is threatening to retire;  Megyn and Shepard Smith, (both who gave 
>>> in excess of $70k to the Clinton Campaign/PAC) are in as rising 
>>> stars....Hannity will be shopping and probably go the way of Beck (create 
>>> his own network) and poor Greta, I doubt she'll be able to hang on much 
>>> longer.  
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> To say it's at "fever pitch" is an understatement. Even Fox - which 
>>>> used to be the only balanced on of the cable networks - has gone off the 
>>>> rails and has 90% of their airtime devoted to trashing Trump. I read that 
>>>> the ousting of Ailes was due to pressure from Murdoch's two sons; my guess 
>>>> is that they are liberals who will now move Fox to just another leftloon 
>>>> network.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Wallace didn't press Hillary nearly as hard as he should have in 
>>>> that interview. Frankly I'm surprised he even showed the clip of Comey 
>>>> saying she'd lied repeatedly. What he failed ENTIRELY to address was when 
>>>> she shamelessly blamed her underlings (stating she had no reason to 
>>>> suspect 
>>>> they would have made the mistake of sending her classified emails). She 
>>>> signed a document upon becoming Secretary of State that she KNEW that 
>>>> classified info would only rarely be marked as such when sent and that it 
>>>> was HER JOB to recognize it when she saw it and protect it accordingly. 
>>>> That's kind of hard to do when you're using an unsecured server. But 
>>>> Wallace mentioned none of this and let her get away with blaming others 
>>>> for 
>>>> her abject failure to exercise even minimal standards of protecting 
>>>> sensitive info.
>>>>
>>>> NONE of them have revealed the truth about that POS Khan. NONE of them 
>>>> are revealing why global outsourcer Meg Whitman might favor Hillary 
>>>> Clinton 
>>>> over they guy who promises to end outsourcing without penalties. Megyn 
>>>> Kelly has been undermining Trump every chance she could for months.
>>>>
>>>> Today, I've had it on and seen one program after the other jump on the 
>>>> same bandwagon - that his campaign is going down the tubes. That his 
>>>> advisors are planning an intervention. That the GOP is considering 
>>>> alternatives in case he drops out. It's like I'm watching CNfuckingN or 
>>>> something.
>>>>
>>>> But yeah, I've never seen anything like it either. 
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>  
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to