While I don't disagree with what she says in each of the five examples, for me personally, delivering and raising two daughters had the somewhat different/opposite effect on me. I don't grasp how a woman can get to the stage in pregnancy where you learn what foods your kid doesn't like or when they decide to do gymnastics - and still think it's ok to kill at that stage of life. Yet liberals and anyone screaming about limiting abortions to 20 weeks of age are doing exactly that - demanding a woman's right to abort even when it's plainly obvious that a living human life is about to be killed.
Before I had kids I was staunchly pro-choice. Now, thanks to the radical left nutjobs of today, that equates to abortion up to delivery date or deafening screeching about a war on women or, as the author of your link described - men controlling women's bodies. And sadly I have mixed feelings about opposing that too (unless the health of the mother or a disability/deformity of a fetus is involved), but here's why. I think it's EXTRA nuts to force any woman who would *choose* to abort a 5-6 month old (VIABLE) fetus to carry it to term, as she's clearly a monster and would make a horrible mother. On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 2:32:23 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote: > > it's possible that even the most wildly pro-abortion person on the planet > might decide to actually carry her own fetus to term (or talk her daughter > into doing so). > --- > > https://www.romper.com/p/5-reasons-becoming-a-mom-made-me-even-more-pro-choice-808 > > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 1:13:25 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >> >> >> I know. But if you think about it, there are only two choices when it >> comes to a fetus - life or death (abortion). So if you aren't pro-life, are >> you not really pro-abortion? >> >> I have less problem with the term "pro choice" than I do with all the >> other bs like "women's health" and "reproductive health". Those are >> intentionally deceptive bs IMO. Because it's possible that even the most >> wildly pro-abortion person on the planet might decide to actually carry her >> own fetus to term (or talk her daughter into doing so). Though I have read >> about a small segment of the population that thinks we should be aborting >> every fetus conceived on Earth due to overcrowding. >> >> >> >> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 1:27:39 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote: >>> >>> Brian does term pro choice as generic as it is ease your sensibilities . >>> Let's say you are deemed a non viable bundle of cells due to some legal >>> justification say your now a burden on the state and you are picked up >>> taken to a room tied up and they shoot you in the back of the head. That is >>> the literal equivalent of an >>> abortion. Is that murder? >>> >>> On Aug 13, 2016 12:07 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> When it comes to Planned Parenthood it's not about "choice", or they'd >>>> offer adoption services, and they don't. It's about abortion and only >>>> abortion when a pregnant woman goes there. >>>> >>>> As for your other question, I'm not remotely religious. I do, however, >>>> have a background in healthcare and grasp that a fetus is not a tumor or >>>> some sort of cancer - it's a human life. That is why I have no problem >>>> whatsoever with limiting abortions to the first trimester - like most >>>> civilized nations do. The pro-abortion democrats in America, however, >>>> shriek to the high heavens when lawmakers try to legislate even that. They >>>> want the right to abort a baby up to and including the day it's freaking >>>> due - and that, IMO, is murder once the fetus would be viable outside the >>>> mother's womb. >>>> >>>> For me it's not religion. it's science. >>>> >>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 12:39:45 PM UTC-4, brine wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer the term Pro-Choice ... after all it IS a choice and no >>>>> amount of hand wringing and finger pointing will change that ... if you >>>>> have a deep religious objection to abortion, that is fine ... in that >>>>> scenario, the person will be judged for their decision by god when she >>>>> dies!!! Here's a question, if my religious beliefs are not the same as >>>>> yours, why must I follow your religion's rules??? >>>>> >>>>> There is a clinic about a mile from my house that I pass on the >>>>> weekends when i go to Wegmans ... there is a crowd of people prancing >>>>> with >>>>> crosses and sandwich boards denouncing the place, I see no adopted >>>>> children >>>>> along side them!!! >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:34 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I know, right? Even the nasty women at Planned Parenthood are too >>>>>> cowardly to call themselves what they are - pro-abortion. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 10:50:11 AM UTC-4, fed up wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They can't call it what it is or else it would expose their agenda >>>>>>> which they know is morally reprehensible. They have to follow the >>>>>>> typical >>>>>>> liberal MO of obfuscate, inveigle and mislead. Remember their audience >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> the same one Gruber was talking about, those 47 percent of hopelessly >>>>>>> stupid Americans that will fall for anything and vote for people like >>>>>>> Obummer or the Hildebeast. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid* >>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2016 10:39 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then call it what it is - abortion freedom. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The phrase "reproductive freedom" implies one's right to reproduce. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:40:14 AM UTC-4, plainolamerican >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What? Are you claiming women in America have some sort of >>>>>>> restriction on their right to reproduce? >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> no, on their ability to abort a fetus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 21 Abortion Clinics Have Closed in Texas in Three Years Under Key ... >>>>>>> <http://www.lifenews.com/2016/06/24/21-abortion-clinics-have-closed-in-texas-in-three-years-under-key-pro-life-law/> >>>>>>> www.lifenews.com/.../21-*abortion*-*clinics*-have-*closed* >>>>>>> -in-texas-in-three... >>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Wiqeefm2fHUJ:www.lifenews.com/2016/06/24/21-abortion-clinics-have-closed-in-texas-in-three-years-under-key-pro-life-law/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LifeNews.com >>>>>>> Jun 24, 2016 - Since a portion of the law went into effect, 21 abortion >>>>>>> clinics closed in ... limits in the past, including the federal ban >>>>>>> on partial-birth abortion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeezus, Plainol, >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> you can just call me plainol. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you need to get out more. You're puking out the kind of nutty shit >>>>>>> only seen on dark internet holes filled with liberal moonbats. >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> it would suck to be an ignorant conservative xian like you, who >>>>>>> would restrict a women's decision to abort a fetus. >>>>>>> here .. educate yourself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://prochoice.org/education-and-advocacy/about-abortion/history-of-abortion/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Supreme Court Reopens Clinics Closed By Anti-Abortion Law ... >>>>>>> <https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-reopens-clinics-closed-by-anti-abortion-law-34122cbab5d0> >>>>>>> https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-reopens-*clinics*-*closed* >>>>>>> -by-anti-... >>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FpuaDQQYMCEJ:https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-reopens-clinics-closed-by-anti-abortion-law-34122cbab5d0+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ThinkProgress >>>>>>> Supreme Court Reopens Clinics Closed By Anti-Abortion Law ... >>>>>>> reopen after they were closed due to a recent decision by a >>>>>>> conservative federal appeals court. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 5:18:32 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What? Are you claiming women in America have some sort of >>>>>>> restriction on their right to reproduce? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeezus, Plainol, you need to get out more. You're puking out the >>>>>>> kind of nutty shit only seen on dark internet holes filled with liberal >>>>>>> moonbats. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 5:13:48 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the war on women >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> while there's been a lot of improvements, the reproductive rights of >>>>>>> women are still under attack. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 3:53:52 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perplexed excuse the term but I think they shot their load at the >>>>>>> war on women >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2016 2:48 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Hillary Clinton is about as far from being a "girl" as you can >>>>>>> get. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. Elizabeth Warren shows what a blithering idiot she is by claiming >>>>>>> Trump made "death threats". That's as ignorant as these college-age >>>>>>> lunatics claiming words are "violence". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Personally I think this very sort of ridiculous spastic >>>>>>> emotobabbling we're seeing from the left over every single thing Trump >>>>>>> says >>>>>>> will backfire. More and more Americans will see the libtards for the >>>>>>> abject >>>>>>> morons they truly are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 12:24:45 AM UTC-4, plainolamerican >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Elizabeth Warren just summed up the reaction many people are having: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Elizabeth Warren ✔ @elizabethforma >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .@realDonaldTrump makes death threats because he's a pathetic coward >>>>>>> who can’t handle the fact that he’s losing to a girl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 5:51 PM - 9 Aug 2016 >>>>>>> 40,034 40,034 Retweets 69,587 69,587 likes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> brine >>>>> http://brineb.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
