Yep, and it seems to be growing by the day. On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 5:21:10 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote: > > I have said before she must have better blackmail files than J Edgar > Hoover. > > On Aug 16, 2016 3:08 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > The Justice Department has gone to great lengths to protect Mrs. Clinton > <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> during this presidential campaign, > refusing to pursue charges that she mishandled classified information, and > fighting against forcing her to testify under oath in a court case about > her emails. The department also reportedly refused an FBI > <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> recommendation to > investigate the Clinton Foundation. > ----------- > The so-called "Justice Department" has no business trying to fight Hillary > Clinton's battles in that Judicial Watch matter. That is HILLARY'S problem > - not the Justice Department's. > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 3:31:51 PM UTC-4, Travis wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/15/house-gop-lays-out-perjury-case-hillary-clinton/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=email_this&utm_source=email >> House GOP lays out case for Clinton perjury over emails >> >> By Stephen Dinan <http:///staff/stephen-dinan/> >> >> Two top House Republicans accused Hillary Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> of appearing to have lied to Congress >> <http:///topics/congress/>, laying out a case Monday they said could >> sustain perjury charges against the former State Department >> <http:///topics/department-of-state/> secretary for her use of a secret >> email server. >> >> Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Oversight >> <http:///topics/oversight/> Chairman Jason Chaffetz said the evidence >> collected by the FBI <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> >> during its investigation of Mrs. Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/>’s email use contradicts what she >> herself told Congress <http:///topics/congress/> in testimony last year. >> ------------------------------ >> >> Mrs. Clinton <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> testified that she never >> sent or received information marked classified, but FBI >> <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> Director James Comey >> <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> said there were three such documents >> that were marked at the time. >> >> Mrs. Clinton <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> also said her lawyers >> “went through every single email” in deciding which ones to return to the >> government to comply with open-records laws, but Mr. Comey >> <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> said that wasn’t true, and in fact the >> lawyers only used search terms and subject lines. >> >> The two chairman also said the FBI >> <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> showed Mrs. Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> didn’t provide all of her work-related >> emails to the government, and also had more than one server that stored her >> messages. >> >> “Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/>’s sworn testimony that are at odds >> with the FBI <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/>’s >> findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in >> light of the facts and evidence FBI >> <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> Director James Comey >> <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> described in his public statement on >> July 5, 2016 and in testimony before the Committee on Oversight and >> Government Reform on July 7, 2016,” the chairmen said in a letter referring >> the case to U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips, the chief federal >> prosecutor in Washington, D.C. >> >> Mr. Phillips’ office referred questions to the main Justice Department, >> which didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Monday afternoon. >> >> The Justice Department has gone to great lengths to protect Mrs. Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> during this presidential campaign, >> refusing to pursue charges that she mishandled classified information, and >> fighting against forcing her to testify under oath in a court case about >> her emails. The department also reportedly refused an FBI >> <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> recommendation to >> investigate the Clinton Foundation. >> >> Mrs. Clinton <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> has struggled to explain >> her email use during her four years as secretary at the State Department >> <http:///topics/department-of-state/>, and has also been challenged to >> square her public defense over the last year with the details Mr. Comey >> <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> laid out from his investigation. >> >> Mr. Comey <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> said three of Mrs. Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/>’s messages had a “(C)” marking next to >> paragraphs designating them as classified at the time she handled them, >> which would appear to belie her declaration that none of the information >> was marked. >> >> However, the FBI <http:///topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/> chief >> also said that while anyone at that level of government should have known >> what those markings were, Mrs. Clinton <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> >> was not “sophisticated” enough to understand what she was handling. >> >> Mr. Comey <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> said he recommended against >> prosecuting Mrs. Clinton <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> because even >> though she was “negligent,” he couldn’t show she was aware of the risks she >> was taking with national security. >> >> Still, his testimony to Congress <http:///topics/congress/> about his >> decision-making was damning because it poked holes in many of Mrs. >> Clinton <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/>’s explanations. In addition to >> the classified markings, Mr. Comey <http:///topics/james-b-comey/> said >> his office found thousands of work-related messages Mrs. Clinton >> <http:///topics/hillary-clinton/> never returned to the State Department >> <http:///topics/department-of-state/> — despite her assurance that she’d >> given back everything under her control. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> ------------------------------ >> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> Visit Your Group >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMTcwMG44BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzEzNTc4NTU-> >> >> >> >> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbWE4dWRuBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3MTM1Nzg1NQ--> >> >> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >> >> __,_._,___ >> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > >
-- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
