http://stupidfrogs.org/articles/why_we_cannot_defeat_the_enemy.html


Why We Cannot Defeat the Enemy



By Eileen F. Toplansky
FamilySecurityMatters.org



On August 3, 2016 I was invited to speak on Sean Hannity Radio (Hour 3)
concerning my *American Thinker* piece
<http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/is_there_a_backstory_about_khizr_khan_and_donald_trump.html>
about
Khizr Khan.  The other guest speaker was Richard T. Higgins, who is an
outspoken critic about the "faulty strategic assessment that is the basis
for current U.S. security" since it is ably enabling our enemies.



Higgins has worked with Steve Coughlin, author of *Catastrophic
Failure*: *Blindfolding
America in the Face of Jihad*, and Dr. Sebastian Gorka
<http://thegorkabriefing.com/about/> who is "an internationally recognized
authority on issues of national security, irregular warfare, terrorism and
democratization and has testified before Congress [.]"



These men have devoted their lives to alerting the American public to the
true dangers of Islam.  During the Hannity interview, I explained how Khizr
Khan was really symptomatic of a much larger issue -- that of hijrah
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260019/hijrah-europe-robert-spencer> or
the deliberate immigration of Muslims to the land of the infidel in order
to establish a global caliphate.



As a result of this encounter, Higgins was kind enough to send me his 2010
masters thesis entitled "No Common War" which clearly states that the
West's reliance on technology and science, without taking into
consideration the impact of religious zeal, has created a strategic
security situation that is being exploited by the Islamic Movement; in
other words, the West's dependence on technology is making us blind to the
other non-violent forces of Islam which permeate our society making us ripe
for eventual dhimmitude or second-class status in an Islamic society.



In fact, "billions of taxpayer dollars are spent on the development and
acquisition of technical solutions to problems, often despite their
non-technical nature."  Higgins  explains that ". . .  while many Muslims
may eschew violence, this does not imply that the political threat is
neutralized."   Political warfare from the Islamist perspective
concentrates on "collapsing the enemy's belief system" and it is
accomplished in a variety of ways. Until we, as a nation, understand that
Islam has developed a myriad of front organizations and has infiltrated our
media outlets, as well as our scouting, professional social, and military
organizations, we cannot properly defeat them.



As a nation, our security framework does not take the religiously inspired
terrorism and its attendant features seriously, believing that the defeat
of groups such as ISIS only requires strong military intervention while
ignoring the enemy's true nature, strategy and organization.  Higgins
emphasizes that the U.S. needs a new security strategy concept that must
account for "religion, non-violent warfare, and the digital operating
environment."  Without comprehending the "theological drivers" of the
ongoing Islamic war, the West will be hamstrung in its attempts to overcome
this enemy.



The Islamic Movement has developed a deceptive narrative of Islam among
non-Muslims as a direct result of digital communication and mass media.
They accomplish this through the doctrines of Taqqiya and Slander.  The
definition of "slander under shariah or Islamic law is very different than
in the U.S. legal system.  Thus, as Claire Lopez explains, "[t]heprohibition
<http://www.clarionproject.org/content/thou-shalt-lieâ?¦how-islam-uses-slander-and-lying-advance-shariah>
on
telling harbi (non-Muslim residents of Dar al-Harb, the lands where
inhabitants do not live under shariah) anything negative about Islam is
meant to keep infidels unaware of the true character and intentions of
shariah-promoting Muslims. In fact, telling the actual truth about Islam to
non-believers is considered so detrimental to the prospects for shariah
Islam to achieve its global domination objectives that Muslims can be
subject to punishment if they disclose such things."  It also "explains why
smiling imams in Armani suits with nicely-trimmed beards can be heard
speaking in soothing tones to gullible non-Muslims about how shariah is
just like the U.S. Constitution, and shariah-adherent Muslims are just like
any other citizens of liberal democracies, or Islam really means 'peace' -
while in Arabic, to Muslim audiences, they don't hesitate to talk about
jihad, suicide bombing, and killing Jews. This is the legally-sanctioned
code of silence that is imposed and enforced within Islam and goes
hand-in-hand with the Islamic concept of taqiyya (which means deceit or
dissimulation)."



In fact, "[i]t is not only forbidden for Muslims to tell anything
unflattering about Islam and other Muslims, but it is also obligatory for
Muslims to try to get non-Muslims (infidels) to refrain from saying
anything about Islam that would deter potential converts or alert others to
shariah Islam's predatory intentions." Hence, Taqiyya and lying are
integral tools for shariah-adherent Muslims to use in dealing with
non-believers who do not understand such things.  As a result, members of
the clergy, police officers, and government officials who are won over,
unwittingly help spread duplicitous messages about shariah Islam inside the
non-Muslim society.



So much so, that the West, relying on the concept of freedom of religion is
actually creating "self-imposed blinders for U.S. security strategists."
For example, the fraudulent term Islamophobia now dominates the culture.
Yet this term was created to "leverage the term 'phobia' . . . and employ
political correctness to silence critics of Islam." Ultimately it is
"intended to frighten sheepish Western politicians." Hence, we find Andrew
Cuomo <https://counterjihadreport.com/tag/joseph-schacht/> making the
breathtakingly ignorant remark that "shariah is not mainstream Muslim
thought" when, in fact, "shariah forms the nucleus of Islam itself."



As Higgins points out "weapons are powerless against the 'peaceful' methods
of war.  Guerilla tactics, white and black propaganda, subversion, social
and economic manipulation, diplomatic pressure . . . -- all of these are
immune [.]"  In fact, the key players of the jihadist movement, the
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) have managed "to create a
counter-factual understanding of Islam by prohibiting criticism of Islam
and flattering the West into enforcement of the Islamic Law of Slander upon
itself."  It is truly an amazing feat.  The West refuses to acknowledge
that there can be no assimilation of a Muslim population into American
society since "Islam transcends their loyalty to the United States."



Consequently, to truly destroy the Islamic threat, the West must
irrevocably understand the core Islamic legal and  political doctrines
which are intended to bring down the West.  The U.S. security strategists
still know almost nothing about Islam and what they do know are "lies
propagated by the enemy to create a counter-factual understanding of Islam."

Islam "is a threat to the United States because it is not simply a
religion; it is a complete way of life that includes an alternative
political system harboring values contrary to the immutable principles upon
which the U.S. was founded."



As Rebecca Bynum
<http://newenglishreview.org/Rebecca_Bynum/Why_Islam_is_Not_a_Religion/> has
explained ". . . when we discuss political Islam or shariah law alone, we
imply that there is a religious Islam that is perfectly fine, that we don't
have to worry about. And we leave the major problems of Islamization -
Muslim immigration, mosque building, the proselytizing in our prisons and
military and the infiltration of our governmental institutions completely
untouched and indeed untouchable."  But . . .  Islam ". . . is not a
religion only. Islam is a total system of life and contains within itself a
particular social system, judicial system, and political system which
includes geo-political aspirations [.]"



Bynum emphasizes that Islam "is much too different from other religions to
remain in the religion category" and "should be uniquely classified in its
own category" since "the morality of Islam is inverted." It is abundantly
clear that Islam is Christianity's polar opposite.  By way of example,
Bynum describes the reaction of a father upon hearing about his daughter's
failed suicide bombing.

"'If I had known what [my daughter] was planning I would have told the
Jews. I would have stopped her."

"In our religion it is forbidden for a girl's body to be uncovered even at
home. How could a girl allow her body to be smashed to pieces and then
collected up by Jews? This is absolutely forbidden."

We see this perverse mentality played out when Israeli soldiers are accused
of racism because they will not rape
<http://www.israellycool.com/2013/10/15/those-damn-racist-israelis-who-wont-rape-palestinians/>
Palestinian
women! Then, too, we are expected to accept the idea that honor killing is
perfectly acceptable when a woman who is raped is then murdered by her own
family members. This is a concept that is at direct odds with a Western
frame of mind which cannot quite fathom that "Islam . . . subordinates
everything to itself" since Islam exists simply to perpetuate itself."  For
the Muslim, there is no higher good that Islam seeks except that it
dominate the world.



>From a Christian or Jewish viewpoint, charity is meant to be universal --
to assist others. Consider, however, that the Islamic tradition of charity
is solely for the benefit of fellow Muslims.  Yet global banking has now
been permeated with shariah financing
<http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2011/02/shariah-finance-watch-has-list-of.html>
and
money must be "donated to Islamic charities -- including some that promote
Jihad and support suicide bombing."



Higgins explains that "Muslims do not consider non-Muslims to be the equal
of Muslims, do not consider women equal to men, and do not respect the
right to life for those who deny their prophet." There are simply no
individual human rights within Islam.  Yet, the West repeatedly denies that
these basic Islamic ideas are harmful and U.S. security strategists remain
focused only on the violent tactical manifestations of Islam.  As a result,
"unable to know the enemy, the U.S. cannot assess his strategy,
organizational structure, allies, means, or popular support."  We have an
"enemy [who is] sophisticated, patient, disciplined [and] . . . its
hostility toward us and our values is limitless."



In order to counter Islam, one must accept the irreconcilable differences
<https://civilusdefendus.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/liberty-vs-sharia-july-2010-ltr.pdf>
 between Islamic shariah law and the United States Constitution.  But we
have failed to accept this and instead, under the heading of tolerance and
mutual respect, we have sharia courts
<http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-starr/iranian-american-sharia-law-here-us>
operating
in the United States.  In the United Kingdom there are currently 85 Islamic
courts
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3358625/Inside-Britain-s-Sharia-courts-EIGHTY-FIVE-Islamic-courts-dispensing-justice-UK-special-investigation-really-goes-doors-shock-core.html>
.



How does Islam work to insinuate itself into all aspects of Western
society? One need only consider the following.  The Muslim Brotherhood
continues to prepare the world so that "public opinion [will eventually]
tolerate the emergence of Muslim power [.]"  There can be no discussion, no
rendering Islam from politics as they are inseparable.  For Islam to
succeed, there has to be a "continuous process of warfare, psychological
and political if not strictly military."



Towards that end, The Muslim Brotherhood now has its own political party
<http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/muslim-brotherhood-launches-own-american-political-party/>
in
the U.S. and it would be naive to presume they want anything other than
"institutionalizing policies favorable to Islamists -- that is, shariah
law."



Psychological warfare plays out in the West in a myriad of ways.  At
colleges the Muslim Students Associations (an offshoot of the Muslim
Brotherhood) promote Black History Month giving unsuspecting students a
platform to express themselves through Islam.

 A Muslim flight attendant sues
<https://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/muslim-flight-attendant-sues-for-refusing-passengers-this>
the
airlines because she was suspended when she refused to serve alcohol to
passengers.



Schools now teach
<https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2015/09/05/tennessee-7th-graders-made-to-write-allah-is-the-only-god-learn-islam/>
One
Nation Under Allah.  In Canada
<http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/29/history-months-for-everyone> they
have declared "Islamic History Month" -- and the Ottawa police force has a
banner strung up across their headquarters, declaring their partnership
with Islamic groups." Moreover, they now have government subsidized Muslim
apartheid
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/259941/gov-subsidized-muslims-only-housing-given-license-daniel-greenfield>
housing
in Canada.



In 2011 "the Qatar Foundation International partnered with the Department
of State and the U.S. Department of Education to develop the Connect All
Schools
<http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/muslim-brotherhood-group-to-connect-all-u-s-schools/>"
project .  It is a way to infiltrate the schools to develop teaching
materials, one of which stated "Islam does not conquer.  Islam wants all
countries to become Muslim, of themselves"  and "it is the nature of Islam
to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and to
extend its power to the entire planet." In Britain
<http://www.city-journal.org/html/holocaust-avoidance-10234.html> "schools
are dropping lessons on the Holocaust and the Crusades, seeking to avoid
antagonizing Muslim students."



 Robert Spencer
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8271/culture-surrender-islam> speaks
about stealth jihad in Australia in the form of



·         A 'Muslim only' approach to activities, such as insisting on
'women only' swimming times.

·         Organisations or councils boycotting Israel while ignoring crimes
committed in Islamic states.

·         Appointments of Muslim outreach officers in secular organisations.

·         Lack of protest in the face of halalisation of Australian food.

The media legitimizes sharia as in the case of the Wall Street Journal
<http://www.nationalreview.com/article/223869/jihad-comes-wall-street-alex-alexiev>
sponsoring
a conference in the UAE on "Islamic and Ethical Finance."  In 2015 The
Huffington
Post
<http://www.globalmbwatch.com/2015/07/30/huffington-post-launches-arabic-edition-headed-by-muslim-brotherhood-partners-we-have-reported-on-this-since-2007/>
launched
an Arabic edition headed by Muslim Brotherhood partners.  Moreover, the
media creates fawning press reports
<http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/saudi-prince-alwaleed-could-turn-shariah-creep-into-full-trot/>
about
Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal who is pledging his $32 billion fortune to
charity.  But this so-called philanthropy will "promote the kingdom's brand
of Islam, while censoring criticism of Islam."



The tiptoeing around the building of mosques
<http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/2011/06/07/what-goes-on-in-the-mosque-near-you-evidence-from-america/>
is
yet another way that the West allows itself to be manipulated since "nearly
all of the mosques in the United States are nothing short of terrorist
training facilities."



Polls of U.S. Muslims reveal ominous
<http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/>
levels
of support for the Islamic doctrine of shariah and jihad.  According to the
Mufti M. Taqi Usmani who has written *Islam and Modernism*, ". . .  Jehad
[sic] against the enemies of Islam is obligatory on Muslims. . . and the
domination of Islam is established over all other religions."



In Europe, shariah-compliant fashion
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7833/sharia-fashion> now goes
mainstream with the marketing of the burkini, allegedly designed to protect
the modesty of women.



A high school in Tempe, Arizona is forcing
<http://nationalreport.net/arizona-school-forcing-female-students-wear-hijab-one-month/>
all
of their female students to wear hijabs - traditional Muslim headwear for
women - for one full month in order to teach tolerance.

Muslim students at Islamic schools in America are "taught that the
Caliphate is the only legitimate form of Government."  The Turkish Gulen
movement operates more than 85 schools in the U.S. and it includes a
"reverence for the core tenets of Islamic Law."



Giulio Meotti
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8271/culture-surrender-islam> asks "how
much of our culture are we surrendering to Islam" when a German judge
banned a comedian from repeating verses about Turkish President Erdogan and
a Danish theater canceled "The Satanic Verses" due to fear of reprisals,
and 89 people were murdered in Paris because of alleged "Islamophobic
comments by a lead singer of the U.S. band performing at the Bataclan
theater.  One of the "aims of terrorists is to alter
<http://www.city-journal.org/html/life-or-way-life-14687.html> the way of
life of the country in which they live and kill: to sow fear, mistrust, and
timidity." Hence, in Lille, France the annual flea market dating from the
12th century has just been cancelled because of security concerns.



In many major cities in America, dozens of billboards
<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/09/04/muslims-think-americans-are-gullible-enough-to-buy-a-billboard-campaign-about-peace-and-love-in-islam/>
proclaiming
that "Muhammad always taught Love Not Hate" never publicize the extremism
and violent jihad that is integral to Islam.



How about when people are punished for the slightest hint of
celebrating Valentine's
Day <http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261827/hating-valentines-jamie-glazov>?
Thus, selling roses and anything that is red as in greeting cards or
heart-shaped products, will incur the wrath of shariah justice.  Then there
are the young people  whipped
<http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/695372/Unmarried-couple-whipped-Indonesia-Sharia-Law-going-on-date?_ga=1.86568024.1363186238.1469043950>because
they wanted to date each other.



In Ireland, hate laws were used to silence
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6356/pastor-james-mcconnell-islam> Pastor
James McConnell who "simply expressed his views [about Islam].



Fast food chains
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2616576/Subway-removes-ham-pork-nearly-200-stores-strong-demand-Muslims-eat-Halal-meat.html>
are
now accommodating both shariah finance principles and halal food so that
pork and ham will no longer be included in Subway menus in Great Britain
after Muslim customers demanded the changes.



Each time the West considers Islam as a religion to be protected, Islam is
victorious.   Islam is a political movement set to conquer the world.  So
instead of exposing this, the military now mandates the islamization of its
own forces in order to respect differences.  For example, in 2005,
Lieutenant General John R. Vines, was educating his staff in Islam by
giving them a reading list that "whitewashes jihad
<http://www.city-journal.org/html/anatomy-surrender-13082.html>, dhimmitude
and sharia law with the works of Karen Armstrong and John Esposito"; two
years later, . . . Lieutenant Colonel David Kilcullen, was unwilling to
mention jihad."   And the latest information revealing that officials from
the U.S. military's Central Command altered key data to downplay the threat
of ISIS is "tantamount to being a treasonous
<https://counterjihadreport.com/2016/08/13/tantamount-to-treason-gorka-condemns-distortion-of-isis-intel/>
 act."



Then there is Hollywood
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4397/hollywood-islam-political-correctness>
which
permits its cinematic imagination to be guided by CAIR
<http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/cairprofilestand.html> so that
there can never be a portrayal of Muslim terrorists. And thus, popular
culture helps "stifle debate."  By "prohibiting questions, unpleasant
answers are avoided as is acknowledgement of the need for change."



There simply cannot be a marriage between Islamic law and Western
civilization if the latter is to exist.  For then we have 750
Muslim-dominated no-go zones
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7562/sharia-law> in France.  In Britain
"Muslims Against the Crusaders have declared an Islamic Emirates Project in
which they are seeking to enforce their brand of shariah in 12 British
cities."  Sharia
<http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/699524/Sharia-police-hamburg-germany-islamic-state-ISIS-refugees-migrants>h
police patrols are now seen in Germany.



When hundreds of German women are raped by Muslim migrants, the victims are
told to stay inside after dark, dye their hair dark, and not to dress
provocatively.  Never publicized is the sexual abuse
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/5537/islam-sexual-violence-and-the-west>
of
boys and girls that is endemic in the Islamist culture.



As Higgins points out "Jihad works to coerce Islam's enemies to surrender
their spiritual beliefs and values in order to avoid war."  As weslouch
<http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/160252/sec_id/160252> towards
sharia, and cannot define and defend our own values, we easily cave to the
demands of the Islamist.  In fact, the terrorist and guerilla wings such as
Al Qaeda are strategic distractions since the Islamic Movement utilizes a
broad range of means to execute its various campaigns by permeating the
legal, theological, cultural, political, and other non-violent avenues in
order to "confound U.S. security strategists."



Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have advised Obama
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/3/inside-the-ring-muslim-brotherhood-has-obamas-secr/>
are
helping shape U.S. policy concerning Islam and "the American military is .
. . inadequately prepared to deal with this type of enemy psychologically."
American policy is now operating under the "mantra of multicultural
tolerance" and ignoring the Islamist "non-violent subversive methods."



The Islamist is controlling
<https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6680/islamic-inquisition-blasphemy> the
flow of information.  The "information-based deception of U.S. security
strategists is highly effective as our current leaders remain without
conceptual understanding of what is transpiring."   We do not identify the
enemy.  We deny the connection to shariah and jihad. We offer excuses and
"reinterpret" the jihadists'  behavior. We manipulate the language to
downplay the jihadists' goals.  Divorcing U.S. strategy . . . from the
enemy's oft-stated threat doctrines is simply "catastrophic." We can only
win the war against Islam when we acknowledge it is a war of ideas
<http://australian-news.net/articles/view.php?id=128> and there must be
unremitting exposure of the true tenets of sharia and jihad, if we are to
prevail.




------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcTQ0b3NqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzE0NDkxODQ->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZHVkM29oBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3MTQ0OTE4NA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to