I would also add Greta Van Sustern to the list, who is Pro-Trump, as well as Bill Hemmer, who's unbiased. The Black guy, Charles Payne, who fills in for Neil Cavuto, along with Lou Dobbbs are both pro-Trump. Several on "The Five" have also either been "Pro-Trump" or at least unbiased toward him, to include Eric Bolling, and Kimberly Guilfoyle. Guttfeld has been clearly Anti-Trump, as well as Dana Perino, who attempts to act unbiased, but clearly a Globalist/Elitist/Bush Camp crew member.
Andrea Tantoros was supposedly removed because of her "Pro-Trump stance. Of course Juan Williams is the token liberal and hates everything conservative, including Trump, but he shares his disdain for all conservatives. (Surprisingly, Williams son is a Pro-Trump guy and was a Trump delegate during the convention. Geraldo Rivera who is typically liberal, but nevertheless a "Trump-Supportive". (Rivera is a registered Republican too by the way) The attorney Pete Johnson who appears sometimes in the morning, is a registered Democrat and conservative, is also unbiased and may be a Trump supporter. All of the FOX & Friends peeps, Doocey, Kilmead and Ainsley Earhardt are all pro-Trump. Those who are not Trump supporters and show their disdain: Megyn Kelly; (Bitch) Shepard Smith; (Far left Extremist Liberal Asshole) Brit Hume; (Disappointing) Jon Scott; Julie Banderas; Trace Gallagher; Charles Krauthammer; (Globalist/Elitist/Epitome of Establishment Bush Clone asshole) George Will; (Globalist/Elitist/Epitome of Establishment Bush Clone) Kirsten Powers; (Democrat) Karl Rove; (Globalist/Elitist/Epitome of Establishment Bush Clone) Howard Kurtz; (Asshole) Judith Miller; (Hateful Corrupt Bitch) Joe Trippi; (Democrat) Chris Stirewalt; (Asshole; Megyn Kelly Playtoy) Katie Pavlich (Hateful Bitch) Alan Colmes (Confused Democrat; Idiotic) Uma Pemmaraju; (Not all that bright) Meghan McCain; (Ignorant Young; 'Bitchy', Improving; But Hates Trump) Julie Banderas; (She Looks Marvelous!) Dennis Kucinich; (Democrat, Did way too many drugs years ago;) Those Pundits/On-Air Personalities Who Seem To Be "Pro-Trump": Or At Least Un-Biased (And Not Covered Above!) Jeanine Pirro; Tucker Carlson; Laura Ingraham (I Love This Gal!) Stacey Dash; Griff Jenkins; Patrick Caddell; (Former Democrat, but has seen the light!) Monica Crowley; Greta Van Sustern; Bill Hemmer; Neil Cavuto; (Back This Week!) Charles Payne; Andrea Tantaros; (They need to bring this gal back! She's not been fired, but on "Hiatus"! I too really like this gal!) Unsure About: Lauren Green; Andy Levy Ed Henry; (He's Back!) Mark Fuhrman (Idiot) John Gibson; Jennifer Griffin; Laura Ingle; Gregg Jarrett; Linda Chavez; Harris Faulkner; (I like this gal!) Loren Green; (Ditto!) On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:16 PM, geoffrey theist <[email protected]> wrote: > It should be obvious why o Reilly and hanging haven't been silenced. Right > now fox is playing two sides against the middle to keep from loosing a big > portion of their viewers. The fact that Trump is where he is has taken the > globalist by surprise. > > On Sep 4, 2016 10:48 AM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I think it's been obvious since that first debate moderated by Fox that >> there is a concerted effort to take Trump down. As I watched I simply >> couldn't believe Megyn Kelly's first question to him - taking decades-old >> statements completely out of context. And the nasty tone employed by Chris >> Wallace who seemed more intent on attacking Trump than on learning much of >> anything about any candidate on stage. >> >> Bret Baier has actually been fair to Trump IMO - far more than the other >> two. O'Reilly and Hannity seem to be fair to him as well. But they are the >> only ones who didn't actively try to take him down during the primaries. >> >> I have also read that Murdoch's two sons are now calling the shots since >> Roger Ailes was fired, and that both of them are not only very moderate to >> liberal in ideology, but rabid Trump-haters. Frankly I'm surprised we >> haven't seen O'Reilly and Hannity silenced for giving Trump a platform upon >> which to defend himself from the massive effort to destroy him on behalf of >> pretty much every other media outlet out there. >> >> On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 9:14:08 AM UTC-4, Travis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ====================================== >>> >>> >>> >>> https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/03/confirmed-ru >>> pert-murdoch-instructed-fox-news-to-take-down-donald-trump-august-2015/ >>> Confirmed: Rupert Murdoch Instructed Fox News To Take Down Donald Trump >>> August 2015… >>> >>> In an extensive article within New York Magazine >>> <http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/how-fox-news-women-took-down-roger-ailes.html?mid=nymag_press>, >>> mostly outlining the rather sordid details of Roger Ailes, readers may also >>> note specific confirmation of something we outlined in August of last >>> year >>> <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/07/30/nothing-unites-special-interests-like-a-common-enemy/> >>> (2015). Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch instructed Fox News executives to >>> take down Donald Trump. >>> >>> [image: megyn kelly 2 rupert murdoch][image: grubering us bush murdoch >>> jarrett] >>> >>> Excerpt: >>> >>> *(NY MAG >>> <http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/how-fox-news-women-took-down-roger-ailes.html?mid=nymag_press>) >>> […] Murdoch was not a fan of Trump’s and especially did not like his stance >>> on immigration. (The antipathy was mutual: “Murdoch’s been very bad to me,” >>> Trump told me in March.) A few days before the first GOP debate on Fox in >>> August 2015, Murdoch called Ailes at home. “This has gone on long enough,” >>> Murdoch said, according to a person briefed on the conversation. * >>> >>> *Murdoch told Ailes he wanted Fox’s debate moderators — Kelly, Bret >>> Baier, and Chris Wallace — to hammer Trump on a variety of issues. Ailes, >>> understanding the GOP electorate better than most at that point, likely >>> thought it was a bad idea. “Donald Trump is going to be the Republican >>> nominee,” Ailes told a colleague around this time. But he didn’t fight >>> Murdoch on the debate directive.* >>> >>> *On the night of August 6, in front of 24 million people, the Fox >>> moderators peppered Trump with harder-hitting questions. But it was Kelly’s >>> question regarding Trump’s history of crude comments about women that >>> created a media sensation. He seemed personally wounded by her suggestion >>> that this spoke to a temperament that might not be suited for the >>> presidency. “I’ve been very nice to you, though I could probably maybe not >>> be based on the way you have treated me,” he said pointedly. (read more >>> <http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/how-fox-news-women-took-down-roger-ailes.html?mid=nymag_press>)* >>> >>> This is interesting on many levels, but more importantly for a few very >>> specific confirmational aspects. >>> >>> Last year many people were struggling to understand what was going on >>> within Fox News. Many people saw the bias; even more people grew outraged >>> at what they were witnessing; but unfortunately many people would not (or >>> could not) accept what was brutally obvious. >>> >>> Additionally, when CTH outlined the specifics of the factional alignment >>> <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/07/30/nothing-unites-special-interests-like-a-common-enemy/> >>> that was coming from this directive, multiple entities within the >>> “conservative blog-o-sphere” claimed we were advancing some form of >>> ridiculous conspiratorial analysis. >>> >>> The last third of an earlier CTH outline >>> <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/07/30/nothing-unites-special-interests-like-a-common-enemy/>, >>> during this event timeline (July/August ’15), specifically warned Trump –*in >>> advance of the first debate*– that Fox News had this intention. (Scroll >>> down to the part of Megyn Kelly HERE >>> <https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/07/30/nothing-unites-special-interests-like-a-common-enemy/> >>> ). >>> >>> Additionally, within the cited New York Magazine article you’ll note >>> that Lachlan Murdoch personally instructed Harper Collins Publications, >>> another Murdoch business, to give Megyn Kelly a $6,000,000 advance on a $10 >>> million book deal. In 2015 when we found out who Kelly’s publisher was, we >>> presented that specific prediction – again, in the face of much antagonism. >>> However, we were correct. >>> >>> Why is this confirmation important? >>> >>> If you go through the timeline, and look at the confirmation in the NY >>> Mag >>> <http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/09/how-fox-news-women-took-down-roger-ailes.html?mid=nymag_press>, >>> you’ll note the specific group within Fox News who formed the internal >>> Pro-Murdoch/Anti-Trump Fox coalition. They are: Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly and >>> Chris Wallace. >>> >>> Not coincidentally these key Fox hosts were the ones specifically >>> directed to take down Trump –*AND*– the three anti-Trump amigos on the >>> Fox Debate Panel. >>> >>> [image: Rubio debate 2] >>> >>> *Wallace, Baier, Kelly and (circled) Fox News VP Political Executive >>> Bill Sammon – during debate preparations. Bill Sammon is the father of >>> Marco Rubio’s National Campaign Spox, Brooke Sammon. Senator Marco Rubio >>> was also the preferred candidate of Rupert Murdoch because of his >>> immigration position.* >>> >>> Secondly, if you think about Baier, Kelly and Wallace beyond the scope >>> of the debate itself, you might also begin to remind yourself –*and >>> cross reference in your mind*– which Fox shows consistently highlight >>> (what later became known as) ‘*the #NeverTrump punditry*‘. >>> >>> Thinking specifically about Fox News and *Brett Baier*, *Megyn Kelly* >>> and *Chris Wallace*. Now think about which shows give continual voice >>> to: Brit Hume, Stephen Hayes, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, George >>> Will, Jonah Goldberg, Ben Shapiro, Rich Lowry, Glenn Beck, Dana Loesch, >>> Katie Pavlich, Chris Stirewalt and Guy Benson. >>> >>> [image: Never trump crowd] >>> >>> What you realize is the 2015 #NeverTrumper’s (pictured above) were/are >>> almost exclusively booked for appearances on Rupert’s Three Amigo’s: Bret >>> Baier (Special Report), Megyn Kelly (Kelly File), and Chris Wallace (Fox >>> News Sunday and Special Report). >>> >>> These three Fox Hosts are the primary voices behind the Rupert Murdoch >>> anti-Trump faction within Fox News. Remember when Donald Trump pulled out >>> of the second Fox News debate: >>> >>> [image: Megyn Kelly tweet Stirewalt] >>> >>> Another key aspect to keep in mind is that Rupert Murdoch doesn’t >>> operate alone. There are other media entities, not as big but still >>> influential, that follow the exact same set of directives. The Salem >>> Media Communications group is one example (Hot Air, Human Events, Twitchy, >>> Red State, Hugh Hewitt et al), and iHeart Radio is another. >>> >>> Just like Murdoch at Fox News, Salem Media Communications and iHeart >>> Radio hold the same ideological objectives. Every entity within those >>> enterprises is part of the same synergistic networking group. >>> Politically, Club 4 Growth and a host of other PAC’s and political >>> enterprises are funding mechanisms aligned in ideology and providing >>> financial support to the aforementioned political media sales force. >>> >>> As more and more people awaken to the reality they become increasingly >>> self-aware. With that awareness comes a realization that conspiracy >>> theories are quite often not just theory. >>> >>> [image: patriot] >>> >>> *ps. Do you still think Chris Wallace should moderate the third >>> presidential debate? …Knowing full well that the person who determines his >>> income, Rupert Murdoch, has been specifically identified as giving >>> instructions to Chris Wallace to take down Donald Trump?* >>> >>> Oh yeah, and let’s talk about Daron Shaw’s Fox News Polls…. shall we? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> >>> >>> >>> __._,_.___ >>> ------------------------------ >>> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Visit Your Group >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZnR1ZmIwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NzI5NTEyNDU-> >>> >>> >>> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >>> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlb3I0MXM3BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ3Mjk1MTI0Ng--> >>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >>> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >>> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >>> >>> __,_._,___ >>> >>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
